Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
Makes total sense tbf. We can't complain if so.A lot of reports saying that Nottingham Forest are close on this one.
John Percy of the Telegraph is usually spot on.
Think Fulham had summit like 7 loan players last time they was up ridiculousGoldson staying at Rangers.
Would make sense to the Scabs. After all they did scab half a team! Got 5 loan players to replace before they can even get near the team that finished 4th.
They should limit loans. It's ridiculous you can get promoted when half the team isn't even yours.
A couple would be better in the matchday XI, max three. PL is only 2 excluding overseas loans.
It would also reduce the options of clubs stockpiling players.
They should limit loans. It's ridiculous you can get promoted when half the team isn't even yours
good player but total sicknoteAnother one for them to horde. Super
Clubs should not be allowed to stockpile players imho. Just as there’s a limit to the number of players a club can borrow and play in the team; there should also be a limit on the number of players a club can loan out.They should limit loans. It's ridiculous you can get promoted when half the team isn't even yours.
A couple would be better in the matchday XI, max three. PL is only 2 excluding overseas loans.
It would also reduce the options of clubs stockpiling players.
Works really well for Chelsea financially. They make so much money per season on players that have literally never kicked a ball for them. Crazy. We can't negotiate on players for our starting 11 never mind stocking those that we're sending out on loan immediatelyClubs should not be allowed to stockpile players imho. Just as there’s a limit to the number of players a club can borrow and play in the team; there should also be a limit on the number of players a club can loan out.
good player but total sicknote
Just looked on Wiki and he's played over 30 games every one of his season's with Blackburn, nearer 40 than 30 too. Am I missing something Robbie?he's played over 35 games in all the last 5 season....
Just looked on Wiki and he's played over 30 games every one of his season's with Blackburn, nearer 40 than 30 too. Am I missing something Robbie?
I get it now - doh! Fast as lightning me! lolyou're missing my use of 'all'!![]()
Yup, you are right about Rothwell, I was talking about Goode and replying to an earlier post. Soz for the confusion. 100% attendance certificates all round!he's played over 35 games in all the last 5 season....
Obtainable certainly, but realistically it would have been one hell of a result if we’d got him over Bournemouth, Fulham or Forest.Joining Bournemouth. So that's another gettable player gone on the toss of a coin more or less.
Doesn't half have a David Unsworth feel about it now that Forest game.
He sent us down then not long after was binned by Wigan.
Samba's telescopic legs kept out N'Diaye and he's also out of the picture.
Wish he'd just fucked them off in the play offs instead!
But not unrealistic either. Will Vaulks being a case in point.Obtainable certainly, but realistically it would have been one hell of a result if we’d got him over Bournemouth, Fulham or Forest.
Except will vaulks is shitBut not unrealistic either. Will Vaulks being a case in point.
Got to disagree, basically dead in the waters once Premier League clubs are circling. Newly promoted or not.But not unrealistic either. Will Vaulks being a case in point.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?