Revolution
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2009
- Messages
- 13,322
- Reaction score
- 22,152
It is a more neutral and balanced view
As you see it. I don't agree. I do think, however, that you put across your views more eloquently than some of the naysayers. And I see where you're coming from at least, so thanks for taking the time to respond.
can't you see that most of the postings around 'Blackwell out' just refuse to acknowledge any other possible position.
Some, not most, is more accurate I think.
As for criticism, here you go then. Cut and paste this somewhere.
I knew you had it in you!
The Morgan issue you raise is an interesting point. It's something that I must confessed has passed me by, on the basis that I had assumed that our defensive travails were down to lesser men replacing Naughton, Kenny and Naysmith and Kilgallon being out of sorts. There may be something in what you say. I'll have to watch Morgs more closely.
I think what you say about our style of play is the majority view on this board. It's certainly my view.
As you see it. I don't agree. I do think, however, that you put across your views more eloquently than some of the naysayers. And I see where you're coming from at least, so thanks for taking the time to respond.
can't you see that most of the postings around 'Blackwell out' just refuse to acknowledge any other possible position.
Some, not most, is more accurate I think.
As for criticism, here you go then. Cut and paste this somewhere.
I knew you had it in you!
The Morgan issue you raise is an interesting point. It's something that I must confessed has passed me by, on the basis that I had assumed that our defensive travails were down to lesser men replacing Naughton, Kenny and Naysmith and Kilgallon being out of sorts. There may be something in what you say. I'll have to watch Morgs more closely.
I think what you say about our style of play is the majority view on this board. It's certainly my view.