Hand ball for first goal !

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Sandmart

New Member
Joined
Sep 13, 2009
Messages
39
Reaction score
1
Location
Barnsley
:confused:Sat right in front of the first goal.Thought it was hand ball then but it looks even more obvious on SSN.
 

I missed the handball from my position in the South Stand (parallel to the 18 yard line). Will have to watch the replays but it looked fine to me.

A great finish by the Scunny player, so the only fault I could find was our slowness to close him down.
 
I missed the handball from my position in the South Stand (parallel to the 18 yard line). Will have to watch the replays but it looked fine to me.

A great finish by the Scunny player, so the only fault I could find was our slowness to close him down.


Agreed, he was given his own Postcode to turn and shoot.
 
A great finish by the Scunny player, so the only fault I could find was our slowness to close him down.

Calve has to take some responsibility for all this.

The play happened (wheres bergen when you need him?) from a ball over towards Calve and 2 Scunny players. At this point Calve was marking them both, one can only assume that there was no communitcation from Calve to Bartley for some help.

The ball then drops, Calve does the right thing in dropping to mark the player making a run and for Bartley to come to stop the man with the ball. However he is not there quick enough through the original lack of communication and it's 1-0
 
I thought Clave was to blame for the first, although it was blatant hand ball.

The second was shit shit marking.

The third against was a blatant foul.

And it was a momentous clusterfuckup for the 4th.

Can't wait for the highlights as according to Speed who's seen the replays there was one nailed on pen, and obviously the disallowed goal.

I await there postings with interest.
 
I thought Clave was to blame for the first, although it was blatant hand ball.

The second was shit shit marking.

The third against was a blatant foul.

And it was a momentous clusterfuckup for the 4th.

Can't wait for the highlights as according to Speed who's seen the replays there was one nailed on pen, and obviously the disallowed goal.

I await there postings with interest.

Not sure about 3rd being a blatant foul.
 
We'll have a look when the post the feed. Looked it from John St where I was pretty much in line.

Still think rather perversely there is a lot to be positive about from last night.
 
I was directly in front on the Kop and first goal was definite handball and our non penalty was a clear cut, stonewall absolute certain penalty. We shot ourselves in the foot with awful defending but the ref was clearly against us. Warnock has a lot to answer for. I also don't think we did ourselves any favours with Tevezgate. And anyone who says that refs aren't biased doesn't understand human nature.
 
I know I shouldn't drag him up again but I think he was so hated by refs and spent so long with the Blades that the Blades, as opposed to Warnock, have been left with the stigma of being a whinging club.

In the last few seasons we don't seem to get many of the 50/50 decisions not even at home, not even when the whole of the Kop to a man/woman/child scream 'handball' or 'penalty'. Some refs just aren't up to the job but last night he was uttrerly biased.
 
>Warnock is still getting the blame 3 managers later
totally agree with wardlow.. warnocks cringeworthy rantings cost us a place in the premiership IMO
 

>Warnock is still getting the blame 3 managers later
totally agree with wardlow.. warnocks cringeworthy rantings cost us a place in the premiership IMO

Warnock's QPR seem to be getting plenty of penalties this year (5 at last count, some very dubious)
 
Warnock's QPR seem to be getting plenty of penalties this year (5 at last count, some very dubious)

That's because West Ham are finally coming down and if they are not replaced by another London club the PL finances will suffer.
 
Certainly was a handball and the ref had clear vision on it a very poor decision, but my oh my it was a cracking finish.

According to BBC highlights the Ertl goal was ruled out for offside, from the angle it showed it looked fine anyone else get a better vision on that?
 
According to BBC highlights the Ertl goal was ruled out for offside, from the angle it showed it looked fine anyone else get a better vision on that?

Seeing it live I thought the Ertl goal was ruled out because Britton was running back from an off-side position and collided with a retreating defender. Not the worst decision I've seen but then the ref missed a blatant pen in a very similar position a bit later.
 

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom