adiosmiamigo
Member
- Joined
- Sep 21, 2020
- Messages
- 832
- Reaction score
- 636
Seems like a lot of unrest about Chris Wilders tactics.Same with set piece takers![]()
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
Seems like a lot of unrest about Chris Wilders tactics.Same with set piece takers![]()
What tactics !!Seems like a lot of unrest about Chris Wilders tactics.
This is so frustrating to watch. We constantly allow the opposition to regroup and organise themselves making our job 10x harder.Meanwhile while we are pass, pass, pass opposition have reversed 3 double decker busses into defensive position. Then they shout ”READY” and United can start passing to forwards
Presumably teams playing to order.What tactics !!
Leeds, Burnley, Middlesbrough, WBA and Sunderland all break fast.This is so frustrating to watch. We constantly allow the opposition to regroup and organise themselves making our job 10x harder.
We could attack quickly (without hitting it down the feckin channels) and have a group of dangerous attacking players going at 4-5 defenders/midfielders, or turn back, play a few slow passes, and then go against 10 players behind the ball.
While other teams will occasionally stick 4 or 5 goals past poor opposition we'll focus on getting 1 or 2 and being solid. This becomes a huge problem when we're not solid as we'll always struggle to outscore other teams with these tactics.
When we get a chance TO break ..,..Leeds, Burnley, Middlesbrough, WBA and Sunderland all break fast.
When we get the chance too break we go two steps forward then pass it sideways and then backwards giving the opposition time to get back.
A video came up on my Facebook the other day entitled Farke Ball basically Leeds won the ball played it out wide player sprinted down the wing left the defender for dead low cross into the box goal.
O'Hare is a great exampleYep CW has a good record of signing ball carriers. Unfortunately he has an even better record of 'coaching' it out of them.
have to say i agree with everything youve said in that post i was a massive fan of wilder first time round and wasnt against him totally when he came back but for me hes styfling our more creative players with these negative tactics and its starting to concern me just dont like the type of football we are playing just now for a start we need new tactics where we can get 2 strikers up front weve addressed the lack of strikers situation now and got 4 strikers who will get goals in this league play 2 up top with hamer in behind and souza and choudray as the midfield pivots utb ftpWe have ball carriers in Hamer, O'Hare, Brooks, Rak-Sakyi and BBD, but Wilder's "tactics" don't allow it as we play, pass, pass, sideways pass, back pass, didn't we keep possession well boring ineffective football that suffocates any creativity that these players have and make us predictable and easy to defend against.
have to say ive been totally underwelmed with o'hare how hes kept his place week in week out is beyond meO'Hare is a great example
So full of flair and creativity at Coventry, then comes here and immediately morphs into a workhorse number 10 who offers minimal attacking threat
Odd how that happens isn't it
It's for his work rate and defensive contributions. Which is the most important thing for a Chris Wilder number 10have to say ive been totally underwelmed with o'hare how hes kept his place week in week out is beyond me
I knew someone would say that.With all these issues it’s incredible we’re second!!!
Boll%^ksWhen we get a chance TO break ..,..
See me later
We did last timeI knew someone would say that.
Question you have got too ask yourself do you honestly believe we will still be 2nd come the end of the season playing like we are ?
Shirecliffe's busy every Sunday. Nightmare for parkingShirecliffe busy today![]()
Shirecliffe busy today![]()
TWO Boll%^ksBoll%^ks
YupWe did last time
3 from 6 in MF (forget Shacks) is okSouza and Choudhury would work very well together with Hamer or Davies as the ball carrier in front of them.
Ultimately we need options. Souza, Choudhury, Hamer, Davies, Peck, O'Hare and Shacks gives us plenty of combinations for a midfield pairing or trio.
But where does O'Hare fit inagree with you there and think its wilders plan especially if we continue to play a back 4 souza and choudray as the 2 and hamer has to be central in front of them we cant shove him wide left again
I knew someone would say that.
Question you have got too ask yourself do you honestly believe we will still be 2nd come the end of the season playing like we are ?
It's a squad game so having quality on the bench is what it's all about. eg.Burnley ,Leeds and to some extent Sunderland3 from 6 in MF (forget Shacks) is ok
Then 3 from Brewster , JRS , Cannon , Moore , Campbell , BBD & Brooks should be ok.
2 from Seriki , JJK & Alfie (if we're not
But where does O'Hare fit in
If you've got BBD , a striker and a RW in front of Hamer ?
That's 5 players for 4 positions.
Yes , but you see , that winger was probably on his natural flank , not stubbornly inverted by CW coz he's swallowed the "modern game" textbook.Leeds, Burnley, Middlesbrough, WBA and Sunderland all break fast.
When we get the chance too break we go two steps forward then pass it sideways and then backwards giving the opposition time to get back.
A video came up on my Facebook the other day entitled Farke Ball basically Leeds won the ball played it out wide player sprinted down the wing left the defender for dead low cross into the box goal.
Yes I know you need quality on the bench but I'm asking how you would start the game - would you sacrifice the energy of O'Hare or one of the wingers , making us lopsided ?It's a squad game so having quality on the bench is what it's all about. eg.Burnley ,Leeds and to some extent Sunderland
It's these last 3 games where we've really needed the squad depth we haven't had all season, as well as 1 or 2 similar runs of games earlier in the season.3 from 6 in MF (forget Shacks) is ok
Then 3 from Brewster , JRS , Cannon , Moore , Campbell , BBD & Brooks should be ok.
2 from Seriki , JJK & Alfie (if we're not
But where does O'Hare fit in
If you've got BBD , a striker and a RW in front of Hamer ?
That's 5 players for 4 positions.
I wonder if that's what delayed the deal earlier, I can imagine Leicester who need money would've wanted an obligation (Southampton were said to have wanted the same for BBD) whereas we just wanted the option.Well at least it's not an obligation
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?