CONFIRMED Hamza Choudhury joins on loan with option to buy

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?


Meanwhile while we are pass, pass, pass opposition have reversed 3 double decker busses into defensive position. Then they shout ”READY” and United can start passing to forwards
This is so frustrating to watch. We constantly allow the opposition to regroup and organise themselves making our job 10x harder.

We could attack quickly (without hitting it down the feckin channels) and have a group of dangerous attacking players going at 4-5 defenders/midfielders, or turn back, play a few slow passes, and then go against 10 players behind the ball.

While other teams will occasionally stick 4 or 5 goals past poor opposition we'll focus on getting 1 or 2 and being solid. This becomes a huge problem when we're not solid as we'll always struggle to outscore other teams with these tactics.
 
This is so frustrating to watch. We constantly allow the opposition to regroup and organise themselves making our job 10x harder.

We could attack quickly (without hitting it down the feckin channels) and have a group of dangerous attacking players going at 4-5 defenders/midfielders, or turn back, play a few slow passes, and then go against 10 players behind the ball.

While other teams will occasionally stick 4 or 5 goals past poor opposition we'll focus on getting 1 or 2 and being solid. This becomes a huge problem when we're not solid as we'll always struggle to outscore other teams with these tactics.
Leeds, Burnley, Middlesbrough, WBA and Sunderland all break fast.
When we get the chance too break we go two steps forward then pass it sideways and then backwards giving the opposition time to get back.
A video came up on my Facebook the other day entitled Farke Ball basically Leeds won the ball played it out wide player sprinted down the wing left the defender for dead low cross into the box goal.
 
I agree, and having watched a few Leeds and Burnley games, the speed that they also are back defending when possession is turned over is incredible.

Contrast that with our players trotting back we lose the ball and its very different.

Hopefully Souza and Choudhery can change that.
 
Leeds, Burnley, Middlesbrough, WBA and Sunderland all break fast.
When we get the chance too break we go two steps forward then pass it sideways and then backwards giving the opposition time to get back.
A video came up on my Facebook the other day entitled Farke Ball basically Leeds won the ball played it out wide player sprinted down the wing left the defender for dead low cross into the box goal.
When we get a chance TO break ..,..

See me later
 
Yep CW has a good record of signing ball carriers. Unfortunately he has an even better record of 'coaching' it out of them.
O'Hare is a great example

So full of flair and creativity at Coventry, then comes here and immediately morphs into a workhorse number 10 who offers minimal attacking threat

Odd how that happens isn't it
 
We have ball carriers in Hamer, O'Hare, Brooks, Rak-Sakyi and BBD, but Wilder's "tactics" don't allow it as we play, pass, pass, sideways pass, back pass, didn't we keep possession well boring ineffective football that suffocates any creativity that these players have and make us predictable and easy to defend against.
have to say i agree with everything youve said in that post i was a massive fan of wilder first time round and wasnt against him totally when he came back but for me hes styfling our more creative players with these negative tactics and its starting to concern me just dont like the type of football we are playing just now for a start we need new tactics where we can get 2 strikers up front weve addressed the lack of strikers situation now and got 4 strikers who will get goals in this league play 2 up top with hamer in behind and souza and choudray as the midfield pivots utb ftp ⚔️
 
O'Hare is a great example

So full of flair and creativity at Coventry, then comes here and immediately morphs into a workhorse number 10 who offers minimal attacking threat

Odd how that happens isn't it
have to say ive been totally underwelmed with o'hare how hes kept his place week in week out is beyond me
 
Always impressed by people's ability to separate out exactly what drives what happens during a game in terms of whether it's due to instructions from the manager versus the decisions the players are making versus the circumstances of the game.

For what it's worth, during the Cup game v Cardiff when you could hear every word, Wilder was screaming at the players to "fucking pass it fucking forwards".
 
have to say ive been totally underwelmed with o'hare how hes kept his place week in week out is beyond me
It's for his work rate and defensive contributions. Which is the most important thing for a Chris Wilder number 10

When did Wilder take this turn? It was never this defensive in his first spell, even after the 3-3 at Villa which seemed to be the catalyst for a change in approach
 
With all these issues it’s incredible we’re second!!!
I knew someone would say that.
Question you have got too ask yourself do you honestly believe we will still be 2nd come the end of the season playing like we are ?
 

Souza and Choudhury would work very well together with Hamer or Davies as the ball carrier in front of them.

Ultimately we need options. Souza, Choudhury, Hamer, Davies, Peck, O'Hare and Shacks gives us plenty of combinations for a midfield pairing or trio.
3 from 6 in MF (forget Shacks) is ok

Then 3 from Brewster , JRS , Cannon , Moore , Campbell , BBD & Brooks should be ok.

2 from Seriki , JJK & Alfie (if we're not
agree with you there and think its wilders plan especially if we continue to play a back 4 souza and choudray as the 2 and hamer has to be central in front of them we cant shove him wide left again
But where does O'Hare fit in
If you've got BBD , a striker and a RW in front of Hamer ?
That's 5 players for 4 positions.
 
I knew someone would say that.
Question you have got too ask yourself do you honestly believe we will still be 2nd come the end of the season playing like we are ?

Who knows. I’m certainly no happy clapper or a big CW fan after his previous departure. However we’ve certainly done well after last season.

Big, big week coming up. Transfer window and a faltering Derby away. Time will tell!
 
3 from 6 in MF (forget Shacks) is ok

Then 3 from Brewster , JRS , Cannon , Moore , Campbell , BBD & Brooks should be ok.

2 from Seriki , JJK & Alfie (if we're not
But where does O'Hare fit in
If you've got BBD , a striker and a RW in front of Hamer ?
That's 5 players for 4 positions.
It's a squad game so having quality on the bench is what it's all about. eg.Burnley ,Leeds and to some extent Sunderland
 
Leeds, Burnley, Middlesbrough, WBA and Sunderland all break fast.
When we get the chance too break we go two steps forward then pass it sideways and then backwards giving the opposition time to get back.
A video came up on my Facebook the other day entitled Farke Ball basically Leeds won the ball played it out wide player sprinted down the wing left the defender for dead low cross into the box goal.
Yes , but you see , that winger was probably on his natural flank , not stubbornly inverted by CW coz he's swallowed the "modern game" textbook.
It's like Alan Woodward has been erased from our history along with all his successors on our RW.
 
It's a squad game so having quality on the bench is what it's all about. eg.Burnley ,Leeds and to some extent Sunderland
Yes I know you need quality on the bench but I'm asking how you would start the game - would you sacrifice the energy of O'Hare or one of the wingers , making us lopsided ?
 
3 from 6 in MF (forget Shacks) is ok

Then 3 from Brewster , JRS , Cannon , Moore , Campbell , BBD & Brooks should be ok.

2 from Seriki , JJK & Alfie (if we're not
But where does O'Hare fit in
If you've got BBD , a striker and a RW in front of Hamer ?
That's 5 players for 4 positions.
It's these last 3 games where we've really needed the squad depth we haven't had all season, as well as 1 or 2 similar runs of games earlier in the season.

In 6 days we've played pretty much the same starting 11 and subs for each game, with a few exceptions as we haven't had the depth to give certain players (like Davies and Peck) a much needed rest.

If we had the squad depth that we will have post JTW (Cannon, BBD, Choudhury, JJK, new CB) we would have been able to manage these last 3 games a lot easier and probably would have played better in the 1st half against Swansea and the game against Hull, as we wouldn't have been forced to play Burrows at CM and an out of form Gilchrist continuing to start.
 

Well at least it's not an obligation
I wonder if that's what delayed the deal earlier, I can imagine Leicester who need money would've wanted an obligation (Southampton were said to have wanted the same for BBD) whereas we just wanted the option.
 

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom