GoalWatch vs Bournemouth

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Bergen Blade

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2009
Messages
7,374
Reaction score
19,438
Location
Bergen, Norway
0-1: A low corner is half cleared but goes back out to the taker who has time and space to pick out Pethic in front of goal. He beats Doyle in the air and nods home.

It’s normal to man mark at set pieces, while zonal mark in open play. Sometimes there’s confusion when a set piece is half cleared and the defending team has to decide whether to switch to zonal or stick to the players they were originally marking.

Ideally you want your tall centre halves in front of the goalkeeper when the crosses come in. But Collins is pulled out of that area by the man he marked, and the cross goes over Maguire. It is Doyle who is left to mark the much taller Elphic and he has no chance.

Bournemouth1 h.jpg



3-2: A corner is nodded in unchallenged by Lee Barnard at the back post. Collins was (probably) marking him, but met the ball too early. Howard seemed to complain he was blocked on the line.




4-3: Their left winger cuts inside. He plays it up to a meeting Barnard who passes it back to the unmarked Pugh. He shoots low and into the net from 25 yards.

Three of the midfield four are behind the ball in a decent position. Flynn should have been in line with them (see photo). Instead, he has taken up a position to the left of Hill, where he’s keeping an eye on the opposition right back. When he can’t be in two positions at the same time he’s got to chose the one where the danger is most immediate.
Bournemouth h.jpg
 



Anorak alert for this bergs.!
The defending was poor yesterday,but if we score more than we conceed then were onto a winner.
 
Fuck me Bergs!! Get a hobby brother!!:)
Oh, and the first goalscorer was, 'Elphick!' (No, not Ken Boon!!)

Fair play on the observation, but, as gav says, as long as we score more, that'll do for me.
UTB
COYRWW
 
Bear with me, I have to produce some sort of material regularly for the Scandi Blades website to keep the supporterclub within the rules of the Supporterunion for British Football. If we're kicked out of that the supporterclub will probably close down again.

I am interested in the tactical side of football, but maybe a bit more than most scandinavians, hence only a few of them bothering to read what I put up on our website. Motivationally, it helps a little bit to get a few more 'views' when posting the same things on here too.
 
Don't listen to them Bergen I always find your posts interesting. I've never done any formal coaching or analysis of football but I often find myself looking at things in the game and reflecting on the tactical points you and others have made on previous matches.
 
Don't listen to them Bergen I always find your posts interesting. I've never done any formal coaching or analysis of football but I often find myself looking at things in the game and reflecting on the tactical points you and others have made on previous matches.


What the man said^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Keep them coming, Bergen and thank you
 
All this 'you score x as long as we score y' doesn't wash. For periods of the game on Saturday we only had a single goal lead and, as we all know, that's never enough at any level.

Top stuff, Bergs. I thought that we were superior on Saturday in terms of fitness, presence and skill. That's a good start and hopefully the tactics and formations will bed down soon.

A Blade, someone who knows the game and from Norway. What's not to like?
 
I noticed man city , put together for around 500 million still let goals in
Man united let in 2 again

If they can concede it shows youll never keep clean sheets in every game

people forget the paid pros on the opposition are not 15 year old kids
they spend all week practising too

the object is to score more than them, mission accomplished
 
For me Howard didn't react quick enough for the third, ok his view might have been obscured but the shot was very saveable, he wasn't at full stretch by any means and just seemed to drop to his left onto his knees as the ball went past.

He also didn't command his area very well for the second.

He will cost us at least as many points as Simmo IMO. He was just lucky that we managed to score more than we conceded which covered up for his bad positioning.
 
have you seen Liverpools Reina lately , and several others , I think theres issues with this new ball , it seems to gather speed and is catching keepers out
your assessment of their third is very harsh, it sneaked just inside the post ,yes all shots are saveable , if your superman
The Bournemouth manager will be saying the same about Cofies goal , their keeper jumped under it

http://www.skysports.com/video/inline/0,,26947_8045089,00.html
 
I think theres issues with this new ball , it seems to gather speed and is catching keepers out

Breaking the laws of physics in the process!
 
I think theres issues with this new ball , it seems to gather speed and is catching keepers out

Breaking the laws of physics in the process!

balls accelerate after being hit ,when they leave the boot they arent going as fast as when they reach maximum velocity and the drag co efficient changes due to the shape it achieves during flight , some swerve more and this affects speed
so after 15 yards it will still be getting faster then after 25 or so yards then start to slow
 



balls accelerate after being hit ,when they leave the boot they arent going as fast as when they reach maximum velocity

Not true - the point of release is always maximum velocity.
 
For me Howard didn't react quick enough for the third, ok his view might have been obscured but the shot was very saveable, he wasn't at full stretch by any means and just seemed to drop to his left onto his knees as the ball went past.

He also didn't command his area very well for the second.

He will cost us at least as many points as Simmo IMO. He was just lucky that we managed to score more than we conceded which covered up for his bad positioning.

I'm not a fan of Howard at this moment in time, but there did seem to be a deflection on the third and Bournemouth supporters have said the same.

He's just not very commanding for me which leaves us very shaky in defence too.
 
Bear with me, I have to produce some sort of material regularly for the Scandi Blades website to keep the supporterclub within the rules of the Supporterunion for British Football. If we're kicked out of that the supporterclub will probably close down again.

I am interested in the tactical side of football, but maybe a bit more than most scandinavians, hence only a few of them bothering to read what I put up on our website. Motivationally, it helps a little bit to get a few more 'views' when posting the same things on here too.

It all sounds very "Big Brother" that they'll close your supporters club down if not enough people read your website!

Keep sticking the links on here and I'm sure you'll get plenty of visits.
I always like to read your stuff but I forget to go to your website unless I see a link:-

http://scandinavianblades.webs.com/apps/blog/categories/show/1149665-the-blades
 
Love this sort of thing - I hope Danny sits them all down with a copy.

I'm with everyone in loving the five goal spectacular but it will be much better if we don't HAVE to score four each week to win.
 
I also love to see these. I don't often comment on them, but I don't often comment anywhere else either. Don't let a lack of comments trick you into thinking people don't read it and enjoy it.

I have just watched the highlights on Blades Player (I've been busy all weekend with family commitments) and when I saw that we had conceded from two set pieces, one of my initial thoughts was "I wonder if Bergen will be doing a 'GoalWatch' thread". So here I am.

I thought the football was nice on their third goal, they did well to create that chance. But regardless of Flynn's positioning or nice play by them, surely Howard has to do better there?
 
Id much prefer 5-0 than 5-3.
Surely trying to defend better is just as good as scoring more?
Infact i was say its more important than scoring. If you can keep a clean sheet then you only need to score once.
 
Id much prefer 5-0 than 5-3.
Surely trying to defend better is just as good as scoring more?
Infact i was say its more important than scoring. If you can keep a clean sheet then you only need to score once.

So even IF you keep a clean sheet, you still have to score to win. So scoring is more important than defending then? :D

As is it happens, I'm inclined to agree with you, I just think you're disproving your point a little bit with that argument...
 
It all sounds very "Big Brother" that they'll close your supporters club down if not enough people read your website!

Keep sticking the links on here and I'm sure you'll get plenty of visits.
I always like to read your stuff but I forget to go to your website unless I see a link:-

http://scandinavianblades.webs.com/apps/blog/categories/show/1149665-the-blades

They won't close down the supporters club, but a failure to meet the minimum requirement of producing some stuff weekly (or so) could mean we'd be kicked out of the union. This would mean we wouldn't figure on their website, their adverts, other media wouldn't mention us in articles, meaning new fans would have to look harder to find us, etc.. They don't care about nobody reading the website though, as long as it's being updated! :)


Anyway, cheers for the nice comments. To be honest I don't expect these posts to be everybody's cup of tea.
 
So even IF you keep a clean sheet, you still have to score to win. So scoring is more important than defending then? :D

As is it happens, I'm inclined to agree with you, I just think you're disproving your point a little bit with that argument...


LOL yes ive never been the best at getting my point across!
 
so when a rocket takes off it immediately is doing 18000 mph
F=MA
http://www.chacha.com/question/what...elerate-after-being-kicked-in-terms-of-forces

Interesting discussion...the rocket has it's own propulsion of course.

After release there should be no further acceleration of the football because F becomes zero.
The only forces acting on the ball from that point on are air resistance and gravity.
The ball just appears to pickup speed, like Jags screamer vs Leeds.
However, there must be slight variations in speed as the ball travels due to the intial compressional deformation of the sphere (reduction in wind resistance as ball regains spherical shape) and the effects of spin...not sure it is of sufficent magnitude to be measured, glad to be proven wrong of course.
 
according to one theory as the balls inside pressure is pliant then the balls shape alters and resistance varies allowing some variation of speed

a programme on string theory last night says that light might not be constant as they are getting 5 second variations from the outer edge of our galaxy ,and 4th dimensional theories question relativity , so I keep an open mind on our neanderthal take on physics, lets not forget its only a hundred years or so that doctors prescribed drinking mercury and drilled holes in our heads to relieve pressure
 

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom