Fiddling away in High Court while our Premier League chances burn.

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

It means we are all fans of Chengdu Blades.

As you know, the Chinese eat loads of shark fin soup and we put it on here to show our support for them.

You may also have seen the boomerang emoji for Central Coast Mariners or the Stroganoff Pot for Ferenchvaros?

And of course the waffle emoji for White Star Woluwé.
 

In court yesterday the two sides ignored each other, no chat nor pleasantries and at each break the two sides scurried off to their consultation rooms. Deffo looked like not being friends, adversarial and likely to go on for a long long time with neither seeking a compromise. The 20 or so legal people in there must be loving all this on their mega day rates as things progressed at snails pace.

What this needs is not a court case but mediation to find a deal which saves face for both sides but I formed the impression both sides are too stubborn and have too much pride to back down. Ultimately not good for the team.

Didn't they initially try mediation?
 
Didn't they initially try mediation?
I don't know, I only follow bits of the ownership saga as its a bit dull and depressing when we could really push on without it.

Bit I hadn't realised until yesterday and if I understood it right from several snippets yesterday is allegedly there was a deal on the table in front of all parties to sell us in 2017 whereby Saleh ? et al would pay about 31 million for a 50% share, leaving HRH with 25% and the McCs 25%, assuming this was players and assets bundled together from other bits said.

It didn't happen and my guess is the terms for the assets were unacceptable to some.
 
I don't know, I only follow bits of the ownership saga as its a bit dull and depressing when we could really push on without it.

Bit I hadn't realised until yesterday and if I understood it right from several snippets yesterday is allegedly there was a deal on the table in front of all parties to sell us in 2017 whereby Saleh ? et al would pay about 31 million for a 50% share, leaving HRH with 25% and the McCs 25%, assuming this was players and assets bundled together from other bits said.

It didn't happen and my guess is the terms for the assets were unacceptable to some.

They have had a mediation since the case started. No settlement ensued.

I don't see a settlement unless someone comes in with a mindblowing offer for both parties' shares and assets.

Bringing in a 3rd investor sounds like a terrible idea.
 
Sean. This is obsessive behaviour. Take a rest. Move on. Create an O.P., go for a walk or something. You're up to the 50 contribution mark on a poor quality thread. Stop hurling insults please.


The post was where you got your £20m figure from.

Shouldn't you play that instead of the poster?
 
Within the past month the value has shot up by some £60m ( according to the KM agreement with the Americans)
Surely within that extra 'windfall' value there can be room for a win/ win agreement for both parties. Then we could all look forward not back.

Since the owners first fell out the value of the club has gone up even more than that £60m. At first they were arguing over a club worth a fraction in comparison to now.
 
The post was where you got your £20m figure from.

Shouldn't you play that instead of the poster?


That doesn't make any sense. Maybe just a typo but please move on. We're done. Self awareness and all that.
 
That doesn't make any sense. Maybe just a typo but please move on. We're done. Self awareness and all that.


It does, but you're just blustering because you won't answer a simple question about the main point of your OP.

I'll leave you to look in your own mirror.
 
What I would like to know is this?

Who are these :shark: that have been mentioned?

I presume one is LYDON RIP sadly missed and @TylerDurden ... but why?
And the other four are.........

and what have they done that was so terrible for the OP to refer to them as :shark: ?
 
What I would like to know is this?

Who are these :shark: that have been mentioned?

I presume one is LYDON RIP sadly missed and @TylerDurden ... but why?
And the other four are.........

and what have they done that was so terrible for the OP to refer to them as :shark: ?


The first rule of Shark Club, we don't talk about Shark Club.

(We just get reported to the mods)
 
It does, but you're just blustering because you won't answer a simple question about the main point of your OP.

I'll leave you to look in your own mirror.


Go for a walk ' fellow Blade. This is more than tiresome.
 
As a lurker I do generally like to read the forum but for Gods sake does Sean Thornton ever have a day off. Trying to bypass all his pish is becoming very tiresome even for a lurking non poster. He really needs to get a life and realise there is a big world out there away from s24su.
 
As a lurker I do generally like to read the forum but for Gods sake does Sean Thornton ever have a day off. Trying to bypass all his pish is becoming very tiresome even for a lurking non poster. He really needs to get a life and realise there is a big world out there away from s24su.


Just block me.
 
Thing is they have loads o'money they never imagined they'd have and surely can create a win/win situation out of the situation. In the meantime the club is losing out, though that is opinion not actual known fact!!!

The Fulham fans were saying exactly the same, exactly one year ago.

They are now saying something completely different.

In the meantime the club is losing out,

You keep quoting this, others then post that Chris Wilder has said that the budget has already been sorted.
 
Last edited:

I can see likes becoming the new cryptocurrency, perhaps we should should have an area on the forum where likes can be traded.

Those who like to be liked could trade likes off people with likes to spare who care little whether others like them or not.

I like that idea..
 
The Fulham fans were saying exactly the same, exactly one year ago.

They are now saying something completely different.



You keep quoting this, others then post that Chris Wilder has said that the budget has already been sorted.

Tom. The first quote refers to the value of the club and the way it has escalated from when the quarrel started and the present day. They were arguing over peanuts at first and now it's about a multiple in the value of the shares in the company.

As regards the club 'losing out'. Forget a number, I only ever said the £20m was a rumour. That's what happens when somebody keeps saying I stated it as a fact, they even start believing it themselves. I repeat I have not found any reassurances that it's a lot more than that though.

I maintain my view that our club is not in a position to invest in the squad at levels a committed owner or the new American owners would be doing if they were already in charge, or even if KM was in sole charge. The dispute brings serious complications in all sorts of ways, not least the fact that both current owners are unlikely to be with us in a years time, never mind the medium term. They do not have a vested interest in the medium term. Yes they need to protect their asset but there's a world of difference between that in this limbo period and proper building investment in the future.

You're right that Wilder has a budget and is getting on with his plans. I'd be surprised if he thinks it's enough. I wouldn't be surprised if he says it isn't in due course when negotiations stall with agents. Hopefully I'm wrong, hopefully the dispute has a clear and quick resolution and our manager, players, agents, sponsors etc.all see no clouds or complications, uncertainties, hanging over the club.
 
I can see likes becoming the new cryptocurrency, perhaps we should should have an area on the forum where likes can be traded.

Those who like to be liked could trade likes off people with likes to spare who care little whether others like them or not.

I like that idea..

 
Point of order Woodwardfan. I didn't say you stated it as a fact. I asked you where you got the figure from.

I though you debated honestly? Because that statement is untrue.
 
The first rule of Shark Club, we don't talk about Shark Club.

(We just get reported to the mods)

Well I don’t know what the feckin shark emoji means and no fecker is tellin me so you’re all feckin :shark:‘s until someone feckin explains :mad:

Just bollock me.
Corrected it for ya sharkyfeckinmcsharkface. ;)
 
It’s a lovely day and too many old men are wasting their precious time posting crap when they could be outside enjoying life.
 

You need to stop making things up. It always happens when you've painted yourself into a corner.


You'll go on and on forever won't you Sean.

I tried to close this thread two days ago with a conciliatory post.

Its excruciating.
 

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom