Excluding Cup Competitions: Who was/is a better manager at their spell at Bramall Lane

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

You can debate the issues of expectations, transfers, re-building etc but in terms of this season, Clough hasn't achieved our ultimate aim which is promotion (at time of writing :))

As mentioned elsewhere, after beating Donny away back in November, we were 3 points behind 2nd spot with a game in hand and a great run of fixtures coming up. OK, you can maybe factor in the cup as an excuse but the League should have been priority and the fact we picked up 4 points from a possible 18 in the run of games up to New Year will probably cost us and that's where Clough has to take the blame.

After great wins at Brizzle and Notts C, we now have a similar run of fixtures where we should be capable of putting a run together but we start with 2 points dropped at home to struggling Coventry. We may still go up this season but if we do, there'll be a fair amount of luck involved and it won't have been down to the master plan or brilliant management.
 

Don't live locally and never been to Hillsborough in my life.

To be honest, I don't see the point of having a great infrastructure if the football is shit. Ours is in comparism to Wednesday. The bottom line in any event is that Wednesday are in hoc to some Thai guys and United are in hoc to some Saudi guys. In either set of guys get bored and pull the plug, both clubs are in trouble.
Not wanting to deviate further, but I think they'd be in more trouble than us.

Anyway, I might put the "Freaky Friday" poser to a poll.
 
You can debate the issues of expectations, transfers, re-building etc but in terms of this season, Clough hasn't achieved our ultimate aim which is promotion (at time of writing :))

As mentioned elsewhere, after beating Donny away back in November, we were 3 points behind 2nd spot with a game in hand and a great run of fixtures coming up. OK, you can maybe factor in the cup as an excuse but the League should have been priority and the fact we picked up 4 points from a possible 18 in the run of games up to New Year will probably cost us and that's where Clough has to take the blame.

After great wins at Brizzle and Notts C, we now have a similar run of fixtures where we should be capable of putting a run together but we start with 2 points dropped at home to struggling Coventry. We may still go up this season but if we do, there'll be a fair amount of luck involved and it won't have been down to the master plan or brilliant management.

That is a little harsh. If we fail it will be Clough's fault but if we go uo it will be due to luck and not Clough?

Fact is we have a side with lots of players aged 27 or under, playing good possession football in the right way. While not going up this season would be a big failure, it would be a country mile away from Wilson's second season which saw us playing turgid hoof to 34 year old Kitson with a team of loans and cast offs.

In terms of investment, infrastructure, playing staff and playing style we are a million miles ahead of where we were when DW1 got the tin tack. Even if we do fail to go up.
 
That is a little harsh. If we fail it will be Clough's fault but if we go uo it will be due to luck and not Clough?

Fact is we have a side with lots of players aged 27 or under, playing good possession football in the right way. While not going up this season would be a big failure, it would be a country mile away from Wilson's second season which saw us playing turgid hoof to 34 year old Kitson with a team of loans and cast offs.

In terms of investment, infrastructure, playing staff and playing style we are a million miles ahead of where we were when DW1 got the tin tack. Even if we do fail to go up.

As I said earlier, Clough has had a much better hand to deal with than Wilson did in his 2nd season.

I'm not saying the blame lies firmly with Clough, but you can't argue that to go up from this position will be lucky given that it will take either a spectacular collapse above us or the play-off lottery. We played some great stuff under Wilson in his 1st season, albeit with better players but how different has some of the stuff under Clough (particularly in the run I'm referring to) been to the 'turgid' stuff under Wilson as you describe it ?

The next two games will give us more of an answer I suspect.
 
I can see that, but the fact is the club has backed Clough financially and the current squad certainly have the ability to perform at a higher level (cf the cup games), hence if we fail to go up, it will be a management failure, nothing more, nothing less. What I am against is masking that reality with some PR aabout this being a "rebuilding" season.

I'd say we are about half way through a three year re-build.

Been a long time since the club has taken such a stance and I find it refreshing.
Much better than getting a team together who might stop the manager getting the sack around Xmas but with no forward thinking which is what we have tended to do in the past..
 
As I said earlier, Clough has had a much better hand to deal with than Wilson did in his 2nd season.

I'm not saying the blame lies firmly with Clough, but you can't argue that to go up from this position will be lucky given that it will take either a spectacular collapse above us or the play-off lottery. We played some great stuff under Wilson in his 1st season, albeit with better players but how different has some of the stuff under Clough (particularly in the run I'm referring to) been to the 'turgid' stuff under Wilson as you describe it ?

The next two games will give us more of an answer I suspect.

Personally I don't think you can ever say a promotion is lucky. While individual play off games may contain elements of luck, you have earnt the right to be there over a season.

As for the turgid question, I suppose it depends on your opinion. During that run we basically controlled the games against Barnsley and MK with fantastic possession football but just didnt take our chances. While we undoubtedly have some fans who constantly want us to 'gerrit forrard' I enjoy watching us have eleven players comfortable on the ball playing the game the right way and crucially being on top in games and creating the better chances.

While it was a poor run and will cost us top 2, again for me, it was a million miles away from watching us lump long balls and long throws into Kitson, hoping a ball would bounce nicely as our only creative option while losing 2 0 at home to Crawley or Yeovil.

I love this current side, I love the energy and youth, I love the individual characters and most of all I love the style we play.
 
To be completely truthful, I don't understand the need for a comparison.

Firstly, it's a pointless academic exercise. It will never be anything other than ifs, ands, or buts. Ratios and percentages will run riot as posters have clearly subscribed to.

Secondly, am I missing something, or was the reason for this thread anything other than a cynical exercise in proving a point? We're where we are, we have the manager we have, and my feeling is that on the whole we're doing well. I'm not one of those Unitedites who make those declarations that we're better than we are. We're here, in this dreadful division, for a reason. I see that some posters put the blame squarely on the building of the South Stand. For myself that's a tad simple as an excuse for underwhelming decline. From root to branch we've got things wrong. From owners, management, through to what happens on the pitch, there's been nothing that I can, hand on heart, honestly say has been the sign of a club well run, with the type of transparency that would have expected.

One thing I do feel, and that's all it is, a feeling, is that we're making progress. I know the comment may come back, "by whose standards?", well by the things that I see coming together slowly, those things that tell me we have a manager who's building a club that's fit for purpose. Maybe those same critics should cast their gaze in the direction of Ferguson's first 5-6 season's at Man Utd? Nothing delivered by way of trophies or championships, yet slowly something was rebuilt at what has been regarded as one of the giants of English football. Clough has been here less than two seasons, we're not in the relegation zone, we're in the top six, yet already posters like the OP reach a conclusion that Clough's tenure as manager should be ended. And before anyone says otherwise, there's a subtext to many thing, and this post is no different, the only thing lacking transparency in the OP's heading was a more direct accusation that Clough is a failure..

I sometimes feel that the imaginations, as well as relative experience, of some of the posters on the forum bears no relationship to what it must be like to manage a business. What does become clear is an unhealthy craving for immediate progress, in this case promotion. Much has been written about chopping and changing manager's. The consensus seemed to be that we, for once, allow a manager to get on with the job of taking this club by the scruff of the neck, as Clough has done, and shape the club into a living, breathing entity ready to push forward, move up to the Championship, spend 2 or 3 seasons preparing for promotion to the next level, all of which seems to be what's at the heart of Clough's strategy.

By all means damn Clough. If he should leave (unlikely I should add) who do any of you realistically suggest we appoint? Would anyone of calibre consider a Division 1 club with a short fuse for managerial appointments? Yet this crazy absence of logic rears it's head once again. It's as if baby hasn't been given what he demanded, therefore baby stamps his feet, wants a new daddy, and then all will be well in baby's world. Currently, the manager of this division's leading team, is receiving stupid criticisms for losing two games, and that's after a season when they, Bristol City, have done exceptionally well. It's not just a United trait, it applies to supporters everywhere. It just happens that what's being discussed here is based on an emotive, knee-jerk set of criticisms because we're not crushing the opposition due to the fact that we're SUFC and are entitled to success. The adult reply to that notion is no, we're entitled to very little. We're not about to be handed anything, yet the same tiresome nonsense continues, from manager to manager, that we're going nowhere. Well all the while we subscribe to short-term reactions, all containing the vision of a peanut, then yes, we'll continue to underwhelm and think that being a 'big' team means anything. It doesn't, not unless you choose to work together, set about improving the club from the ground up, and invest trust and understanding in what's being done to achieve these aims.

Silly OP that should have been more honest about it's intentions.
 
Which is the best team?

Danny Wilson's 1st season?
Simonsen
Lowton Maguire Collins Jean-Francois
Williamson McDonald Doyle Quinn
Evans Cresswell
Danny Wilson's 2nd season?

Long
McMahon Maguire Collins Hill
Flynn McDonald Doyle Robson
Kitson Cresswell
Nigel Clough's current?

It's got to be Danny Wilson's first season there's gotta only be 4 players from that side that you would replace with a current player - Simonsen, Collins, LJF, Cresswell.

What a team this would be:
Howard
Lowton Maguire Basham Harris
Williamson McDonald Doyle Quinn
Evans Murphy
 
Genuine answer: ours. Feel free to send for the men in white-coats, but I have my reasons. I mentioned in another thread that football is pointless and futile, and but for the highs, memories and accolades, I wouldn't be interested (would anyone?). Promotion is soon and we won't be back for some time. Wednesday, despite their current position and takeover, face another decade of laying foundations. Their ground is falling apart, their training facilities are practically non-existent, as is their academy. Every penny that the Thais invest should be invested in the infrastructure - it probably won't be, it'll more likely finance a gamble on promotion. We've been there and failed, and ended up on the brink of oblivion. They might succeed but it's not a gamble I want to see again.
Not that I hang onto things for far too long, but at every step of Wednesday’s disasterclass, I’ve thought of this conversation with Darren
 

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom