Doesn't look like our players are worth that much

[Doormat]

If this site is owt to go by, it wont cost a great deal for any of our players?

http://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/sheffield-united/kader/verein/350

 

[pommpey]

If this site is owt to go by, it wont cost a great deal for any of our players?

http://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/sheffield-united/kader/verein/350

I am surprised.*

*this may be a lie

pommpey

 

[1danewhitehouse]

Yet we could raise £1.314 million by offloading those that haven't been near the first team lately according to that. In reality, the vast majority of our squad players wouldn't even command a fee at all. £280k for Higdon? Someone's having a laugh.

 

[Deleted member 875]

If this site is owt to go by, it wont cost a great deal for any of our players?

http://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/sheffield-united/kader/verein/350

Think that site is a load of bollocks to be honest

 

[I should coco]

If this site is owt to go by,

It's not.

Woolford, £350k?

They must have got the sharpest minds on the planet working all hours with their Cray super computer to come up with that one.

Leave it alone and move on.


ISC

 

[BushBlade]

Yet we could raise £1.314 million by offloading those that haven't been near the first team lately according to that. In reality, the vast majority of our squad players wouldn't even command a fee at all. £280k for Higdon? Someone's having a laugh.

Clickbait.

 

[Grecian2000]

Masturbate

 

[Bath Blade]

Masturbate

I would do over the thought of getting £350k for McEverley.

 

[blade too long]

depends in what context you put it
look at walsalls squad worth , and they are higher than us

http://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/jumplist/kader/verein/899
and top of the league Burtons players are worth half of ours
http://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/jumplist/kader/verein/2963

 

[mattbianco1]

If this site is owt to go by, it wont cost a great deal for any of our players?

http://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/sheffield-united/kader/verein/350

I'd say they look fairly realistic with the exception of Che Adams who should fetch more.

 

[pommpey]

£280k for Higdon? Someone's having a laugh.

Flick-ons, dane. FLICK-ONS!

pommpey

 

[BushBlade]

Yet we could raise £1.314 million by offloading those that haven't been near the first team lately according to that. In reality, the vast majority of our squad players wouldn't even command a fee at all. £280k for Higdon? Someone's having a laugh.

They mean 280kg

 

[Tyler Durden]

They aren't worth the steam off my piss.

 

[Ecco1889]

Delete,it's a load of bollocks

 

[CarlMcBlade]

Getting rid of their wages is more important to the club than the princely sums they're get for these wasters.

 

[Grappler]

It's not.

Woolford, £350k?

They must have got the sharpest minds on the planet working all hours with their Cray super computer to come up with that one.

Leave it alone and move on.


ISC

Are they even still around?

 

[HighfieldBlade]

What managers really need is a Parker's Price Guide for Football Players.
Factors such as age, condition and mileage would give a realistic valuation of the players.

 

[Hunkerby]

Our most valuable players are all in their late 20's or 30's.
The club spends it's money on the short term fix and sells it's future down the river.

 

[Topple]

Ignore that site. Leeds players are apparently worth £17 million and the pigs £28 million.