I'm a big believer in bringing academy players through. To me, there's no point having an academy if you never really utilise it. Obviously there is David Brooks from the past couple of seasons, but going forward I think one area we could look to improve on is giving academy players more of a chance in the first team squad. I'd be interested to hear your view on those most deserving of that out of the players not mentioned on the website.
A good Academy, with a good reputation for treating players well, both on entry to, and exit from, makes it easier to attract players - both as very young lads, and as older lads on their second chance - ie BROOKS.
A football club is not just 26 year olds kicking a ball around in front of 23k. It is about kids having a go & having fun. Without an Academy, you're not a football club, you're a collection of signings.
The new football league rules requiring teams to name one club grown player in the match day squad is a very small step towards legislating an Academy Pathway to the first team.
But, the simple point is that Academy players must create their own pathway - by their performance. Be good enough, you'll get picked.
That said. Here's me shooting from the hip. The real barrier to Academy Lads getting a chance in most league sides (including SUFC) is Managers signing dross no better than existing first teamers & really no better than Academy Lads. The mantra is Sign Sign Sign Announce Announce Announce. Wilder has a good record of finding gems. But the Carruthers Heneghan Leonard Holmes lot - currently, they're just a drain on resources & a block to the Academy Lads.
Certainly, Academy Lads have to prove themselves capable of first team places. But, don't block 'em off with fellas who'll just sit in the stand.
Putting aside Reed & Long.
Slater & Eastwood have been involved around the first team already.
Callum Semple is probably next in line.
But, he & other leading contenders seem, practically, a long way off a shirt to me.
Does that help?