Deadbat
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2009
- Messages
- 6,196
- Reaction score
- 34,714
2023/24 SUFC SEASON REVIEW / SCHOOL REPORT
Staff report
Board / Club
Prince HRH Prince Abdullah bin Mosaad bin Abdulaziz Al Saud Every year I write this, I think this might be the last year I discuss him in my end of season review but here we are again! It seems like the Prince has wanted out for some time but there is a genuine argument over how desperate he is to leave. He will want to get a decent amount of money for the club but something is only worth what someone is willing to pay and the lack of reputable investors means I would be concerned that if he is serious about moving the club on. The price now will only go down and as the debts will surely increase in a lower league, I believe he may struggle to give us away in a few years if it has not happened before then.
The previous season, the Mauriss takeover collapsed and never seemed particularly serious and he is now in a California jail. We then had another ‘chancer’ Dozy Mmobuosi linked but that ended and he too is being investigated for fraud. It seems the Blades are no nearer a new owner and have now sourced a company (Lazard) to help them source new income/new ownership. We have had more links with the an American group recently but most will deal with this with trepidation.
It is rather simple that the Prince simply does not have the money to fund or sustain a Premier League club. I do wonder whether when he bought us he ever thought we would actually be in the top league and he would need to support a top-level side? Wilder’s first spell accelerated a journey that he was sadly ill prepared for. That is not his fault but he does seem to enjoy the limelight when we are successful (came back for promotion and the cup semi-final) and we rarely see him here when the times are tough. The discussion over the lack of money he can pump in may be valid but the actual strategy the club operated to trying to make a proper fist of staying in this league was confusing. We waited and waited on Berge and Ndiaye before selling them just before the season. We did not get replacements in on time and effectively threw away the first month of the season. Whatever arguments are put forward financially about players being in the last year of their deal and thus we needed to make our money loses traction when we see double figures of other players running their contract down as it stands. Granted they are not worth as much but surely if we were selling Ndiaye and Berge then the likes of Jebbison, Baldock, McBurnie, Bogle etc all could have generated money instead of the zero pounds (nominal fee or Jebbison due to his age) we may get now? It seems an inconsistent strategy. Also, those that were saying we had offered Ndiaye and Berge contracts but they were not willing to sign, so we had to sell, seem to not realise that there is a bigger concern? Why do our best players not want to resign? IF this has happened now, then it will happen again. Clubs who want to be successful get their best players tied down and keep them. We failed to do this and in the end lost our best two players before the season, adopted a scattergun approach to signings with random development players coming in, clearly not up this level and the decent signings (Archer and Hamer) came in too late to properly be embedded into the side.
The lack of planning, preparation, and the squad we ended up with was an absolute shambles and I felt sorry for Heckingbottom (ultimately he struggled himself and was rightly sacked but was set up to fail) and then latterly Wilder who inherited this mess. The owner has to take responsibility for us being one of the worst Premier League sides ever. It is not just down to him having no money. We have no clear approach to transfers, a poor recruitment model, an awful fitness side at the club and no real strategy on what direction we are going – with some players sold with a year left and other kept (allegedly with the premise they play better in their last year – well that worked out well didn’t it!). The talk of a restructure off the field to help the manager and have proper football people to make decisions perhaps boded well but then we had the rather uninspiring appointments of Mike Allen (been here before) and Jamie Hoyland (been here before).
After a season of pain and so many defeats, where United were out of their depth – news reached us that the Blades were docked two points. Another dreadful moment in a disastrous season. In truth the Blades were fortunate to get away with only two points and indeed the fact they failed to pay for players they signed surely is not right and would rankle with me if I was a fan of one of the teams we finished above last season. The fact we could not pay our bills and somehow thought we could just avoid it, is frankly appalling really. It is not a good look and this on top of failing to pay our bills the previous season, to businesses and some probably local, just makes us look amateurish. The argument is we then went up and made money and some have said we may have had to sell players but not sure I agree with that – I think the sums being discussed could and should have been paid. I think the Prince was waiting for the new owner to come in and pay for the transfers we still owed but it never happened and it just did not get sorted. I think the club probably thought the Football League would just move on after the embargo but of course rightly (regardless of what rules other clubs may be breaking) they still put sanctions on.
Off the field, we have finally seen some improvements or potential improvements with the hotel set to reopen and more crucially a new training ground acquired on the old HSBC site. We also acquired the two plots of land from McCabe on the two sides of the Kop. We do seem to be trying to address the scouting/recruitment with changes being made in how we did things and personnel moving out and coming in, but these matters should have been addressed years ago and once again we have completely wasted a chance to try and cement ourselves at the top level and are now headed back down to the Championship with a poorer squad than the one that played here last time meaning there are no guarantees of an immediate return. It worries me that we still do not have a director of football or anyone helping Wilder/Bettis with either side of the footballing areas and means we rely and overload two guys to do it all. No other club of stature operates like this surely?
----
The rest of the board as it stands are officially (according to the latest programme) but none of these are in Sheffield and not sure we ever hear or see any of them – I assume board meetings exist online but it seems a strange way to operate (although maybe many businesses/football clubs – Man City for instance – operate like this now?) The fact my notes on these board members remain unchanged for a few years, is a worry but I have to reference them as they are still here according to the listed programme and website!
Yusuf Giansiracusa Was told he was acting chairman when the Prince’s son stepped down but has been chairman for over 2 years! A lawyer by trade – he is most well-known for his press conference after Jokanovic was fired. He said after that we would not hear from him or see him (or the rest of the below) and to be fair he was right as the overall day to day stuff been left to Bettis although he came back to hand the medals out – but that was it.
Princess Reem Another who we don’t hear much from her or what her role is? Apparently, she is involved with the women’s team?
Abdullah Alghamadi – works for a company called Amos holdings and is group CEO where Abdullah’s son also has a role. Alghamadi is Group CEO. He is listed also as a Financial and Investment Advisor as well as being a Sheffield United Board member and a Beerschot board member. He is listed as the CEO of the United World group…
https://unitedworldacademy.com/our-team/
Staff report
Board / Club
Prince HRH Prince Abdullah bin Mosaad bin Abdulaziz Al Saud Every year I write this, I think this might be the last year I discuss him in my end of season review but here we are again! It seems like the Prince has wanted out for some time but there is a genuine argument over how desperate he is to leave. He will want to get a decent amount of money for the club but something is only worth what someone is willing to pay and the lack of reputable investors means I would be concerned that if he is serious about moving the club on. The price now will only go down and as the debts will surely increase in a lower league, I believe he may struggle to give us away in a few years if it has not happened before then.
The previous season, the Mauriss takeover collapsed and never seemed particularly serious and he is now in a California jail. We then had another ‘chancer’ Dozy Mmobuosi linked but that ended and he too is being investigated for fraud. It seems the Blades are no nearer a new owner and have now sourced a company (Lazard) to help them source new income/new ownership. We have had more links with the an American group recently but most will deal with this with trepidation.
It is rather simple that the Prince simply does not have the money to fund or sustain a Premier League club. I do wonder whether when he bought us he ever thought we would actually be in the top league and he would need to support a top-level side? Wilder’s first spell accelerated a journey that he was sadly ill prepared for. That is not his fault but he does seem to enjoy the limelight when we are successful (came back for promotion and the cup semi-final) and we rarely see him here when the times are tough. The discussion over the lack of money he can pump in may be valid but the actual strategy the club operated to trying to make a proper fist of staying in this league was confusing. We waited and waited on Berge and Ndiaye before selling them just before the season. We did not get replacements in on time and effectively threw away the first month of the season. Whatever arguments are put forward financially about players being in the last year of their deal and thus we needed to make our money loses traction when we see double figures of other players running their contract down as it stands. Granted they are not worth as much but surely if we were selling Ndiaye and Berge then the likes of Jebbison, Baldock, McBurnie, Bogle etc all could have generated money instead of the zero pounds (nominal fee or Jebbison due to his age) we may get now? It seems an inconsistent strategy. Also, those that were saying we had offered Ndiaye and Berge contracts but they were not willing to sign, so we had to sell, seem to not realise that there is a bigger concern? Why do our best players not want to resign? IF this has happened now, then it will happen again. Clubs who want to be successful get their best players tied down and keep them. We failed to do this and in the end lost our best two players before the season, adopted a scattergun approach to signings with random development players coming in, clearly not up this level and the decent signings (Archer and Hamer) came in too late to properly be embedded into the side.
The lack of planning, preparation, and the squad we ended up with was an absolute shambles and I felt sorry for Heckingbottom (ultimately he struggled himself and was rightly sacked but was set up to fail) and then latterly Wilder who inherited this mess. The owner has to take responsibility for us being one of the worst Premier League sides ever. It is not just down to him having no money. We have no clear approach to transfers, a poor recruitment model, an awful fitness side at the club and no real strategy on what direction we are going – with some players sold with a year left and other kept (allegedly with the premise they play better in their last year – well that worked out well didn’t it!). The talk of a restructure off the field to help the manager and have proper football people to make decisions perhaps boded well but then we had the rather uninspiring appointments of Mike Allen (been here before) and Jamie Hoyland (been here before).
After a season of pain and so many defeats, where United were out of their depth – news reached us that the Blades were docked two points. Another dreadful moment in a disastrous season. In truth the Blades were fortunate to get away with only two points and indeed the fact they failed to pay for players they signed surely is not right and would rankle with me if I was a fan of one of the teams we finished above last season. The fact we could not pay our bills and somehow thought we could just avoid it, is frankly appalling really. It is not a good look and this on top of failing to pay our bills the previous season, to businesses and some probably local, just makes us look amateurish. The argument is we then went up and made money and some have said we may have had to sell players but not sure I agree with that – I think the sums being discussed could and should have been paid. I think the Prince was waiting for the new owner to come in and pay for the transfers we still owed but it never happened and it just did not get sorted. I think the club probably thought the Football League would just move on after the embargo but of course rightly (regardless of what rules other clubs may be breaking) they still put sanctions on.
Off the field, we have finally seen some improvements or potential improvements with the hotel set to reopen and more crucially a new training ground acquired on the old HSBC site. We also acquired the two plots of land from McCabe on the two sides of the Kop. We do seem to be trying to address the scouting/recruitment with changes being made in how we did things and personnel moving out and coming in, but these matters should have been addressed years ago and once again we have completely wasted a chance to try and cement ourselves at the top level and are now headed back down to the Championship with a poorer squad than the one that played here last time meaning there are no guarantees of an immediate return. It worries me that we still do not have a director of football or anyone helping Wilder/Bettis with either side of the footballing areas and means we rely and overload two guys to do it all. No other club of stature operates like this surely?
----
The rest of the board as it stands are officially (according to the latest programme) but none of these are in Sheffield and not sure we ever hear or see any of them – I assume board meetings exist online but it seems a strange way to operate (although maybe many businesses/football clubs – Man City for instance – operate like this now?) The fact my notes on these board members remain unchanged for a few years, is a worry but I have to reference them as they are still here according to the listed programme and website!
- Yusuf Giansiracusa (Chairman)
- Princess Reem Bint
- Abdullah Al Saud (who is the owner)
- Abdullah Alghamdi
Yusuf Giansiracusa Was told he was acting chairman when the Prince’s son stepped down but has been chairman for over 2 years! A lawyer by trade – he is most well-known for his press conference after Jokanovic was fired. He said after that we would not hear from him or see him (or the rest of the below) and to be fair he was right as the overall day to day stuff been left to Bettis although he came back to hand the medals out – but that was it.
Princess Reem Another who we don’t hear much from her or what her role is? Apparently, she is involved with the women’s team?
Abdullah Alghamadi – works for a company called Amos holdings and is group CEO where Abdullah’s son also has a role. Alghamadi is Group CEO. He is listed also as a Financial and Investment Advisor as well as being a Sheffield United Board member and a Beerschot board member. He is listed as the CEO of the United World group…
https://unitedworldacademy.com/our-team/