Danny Hall!

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?




He actually dmed me with this lawyers details unless I apologiesed publicly too him

I’d be astounded if he has “a lawyer” to pass the details on for, what would he be wanting you to do with the details if he had?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dkc
Chris messaged a lot of people for support when he was starting his blog. He was concerned that his dyslexia would put people off so reached out to a lot of people asking for advice. I was one of them and I'm just a copy and paste merchant. I doubt he had pictures of Danny Hall's articles on his bedroom wall. He likely just wanted some support from a journalist from a local journalist.
What if he’s got pictures of you up on his bedroom wall?!

1786181394419.webp
 



I’d be astounded if he has “a lawyer” to pass the details on for, what would he be wanting you to do with the details if he had?
He probably meant through the Star. They’ll have a legal team/external counsel for any of the work they put out there.
 
The Internet has broken some peoples brains

The way that people feel they can talk to complete strangers over a screen is wild! Saying things they would never dream of In Real life and expecting people just to take it.

If I had any sort of profile in the world I’d never be online. It’s part of being a journo now that you have to be online I’d assume, to promote you work, generate traffic. But I feel sorry for a lot of the vitriol they have to put up with.

The old adage of ‘if you can’t say anything nice, don’t say anything at all’ has been long forgotten.
 
Last edited:
The Internet has broken some peoples brains

The way that people feel they can talk to complete strangers over a screen is wild! Saying things they would never dream of In Real life and expecting people just to take it.

If I had any sort of profile in the world I’d never be online. It’s part of being a journo now that you have to be online I’d assume, to promote you work, generate traffic. But I feel sorry for a lot of the vitriol they have to put up with.

Won't someone think of the poor, principled tame Journalists that are the bastions of truth, always impartial and challenging the narrative and would never trade their integrity for access.
 
Won't someone think of the poor, principled tame Journalists that are the bastions of truth, always impartial and challenging the narrative and would never trade their integrity for access.

I’m not a journalist but I’d imagine access is a large part of getting information. There’s obviously a trade off between on and off record and I’d imagine you’re not going to keep that access if you burn bridges all the time. Equally I’d imagine they would accept being ‘used’ deliver a narrative to players or other teams or owners etc etc.

At the end of the day it’s football transfer rumours. It’s hardly watergate or even remotely serious in the grand scheme of things. players with either sign or they won’t and we’ll either sell players or we won’t. Fuck all to do with when it’s reported - it’s all irrelevant by the 31 of August anyway if we had the patience to wait.
 
I’m not a journalist but I’d imagine access is a large part of getting information. There’s obviously a trade off between on and off record and I’d imagine you’re not going to keep that access if you burn bridges all the time. Equally I’d imagine they would accept being ‘used’ deliver a narrative to players or other teams or owners etc etc.

At the end of the day it’s football transfer rumours. It’s hardly watergate or even remotely serious in the grand scheme of things. players with either sign or they won’t and we’ll either sell players or we won’t. Fuck all to do with when it’s reported - it’s all irrelevant by the 31 of August anyway if we had the patience to wait.


When on X don’t they all post as private individuals?

“Views/Opinions are my own” etc

They have, in local cases, R/S and The Star for journalistic purposes.
 



The Internet has broken some peoples brains

The way that people feel they can talk to complete strangers over a screen is wild! Saying things they would never dream of In Real life and expecting people just to take it.

If I had any sort of profile in the world I’d never be online. It’s part of being a journo now that you have to be online I’d assume, to promote you work, generate traffic. But I feel sorry for a lot of the vitriol they have to put up with.

The old adage of ‘if you can’t say anything nice, don’t say anything at all’ has been long forgotten.

What Danny did was petty and pathetic, he literally leaked a private message because someone was being critical of local journalists. It wasn't some abusive tirade directly aimed at him, it was a very tame general critique of the local press. I do agree that abuse of journalists is wrong for the most part, I am sure many get a stupid amount of needless direct abuse but I do think a line is crossed when you leak private messages just out of pure spite.

Like I said before earlier in this thread there are reasons the Paul Walker's and the Nathan Hemmingham's are doing well in their careers and the Danny Hall's of this world are pay walling clickbait.

Danny knows he made himself look an idiot since he has deleted the post. I will be surprised if he bothered to apologise to Chris for posting it though.
 

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom