Football rules are corrupt/biased, its basically like they're allowing/encouraging cheating.
Corner comes into the box, Southampton player accidently elbows it out, no penalty. He didn't know anything about it therefor its not a penalty.
However, lets reverse the roles..
Corner comes into the box, Jack O'Connell accidently handballs it as he controls it, then volleys it into the goal, He didn't know anything about it but VAR rules the goal out for handball in the build up.
How is the outcomes of those two any different? Its pretty much giving the defender a benefit/advantage of using their body (aslong as their arms aren't above their head) to block a shot.
But then The FA contradicts that in their first sentence on the new laws of handball page:
I would argue that the Southampton defenders arm was in an un-natural position, because if his arm wasn't there the ball goes to JOC, now he may not have scored but it would still have been classed as a goalscoring chance.
I feel like these two scenarios, with two very different outcomes is a shit rule.
Corner comes into the box, Southampton player accidently elbows it out, no penalty. He didn't know anything about it therefor its not a penalty.
However, lets reverse the roles..
Corner comes into the box, Jack O'Connell accidently handballs it as he controls it, then volleys it into the goal, He didn't know anything about it but VAR rules the goal out for handball in the build up.
How is the outcomes of those two any different? Its pretty much giving the defender a benefit/advantage of using their body (aslong as their arms aren't above their head) to block a shot.
But then The FA contradicts that in their first sentence on the new laws of handball page:
The law remains that deliberate handball is an offence. But accidental handball will also be a free-kick (or penalty if inside the penalty area) if...
- the ball goes into the goal off an attacker
- a player gets the ball using their arm or hand and then scores, or creates a goalscoring opportunity
- a player's hand or arm has made their body "unnaturally bigger"
- the player's arm or hand is above their shoulder (unless the player has controlled the ball on to their own arm or hand)
I would argue that the Southampton defenders arm was in an un-natural position, because if his arm wasn't there the ball goes to JOC, now he may not have scored but it would still have been classed as a goalscoring chance.
I feel like these two scenarios, with two very different outcomes is a shit rule.