Carlton Blade
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 24, 2017
- Messages
- 19,370
- Reaction score
- 37,820
Posted this in the other thread. Doesn’t sound good at all.
That's Wilder's way of getting news out. That reporter is his usual avenue
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
Posted this in the other thread. Doesn’t sound good at all.
Every single team in the top 8 of the PL has one. Same for every successful club in Europe
Disappointed that the owner and Wilder couldn't resolve their differences I imagine.It sounds to me like we're approaching the end of a brilliant era.
I wonder how people will feel watching Wilder and Knill managing another club to success. Particularly if it isn't going so well at the Lane?
It sounds to me like we're approaching the end of a brilliant era.
I wonder how people will feel watching Wilder and Knill managing another club to success. Particularly if it isn't going so well at the Lane?
Going to massively struggle to care as much. I know there's arguments on recruitment being poor etc but I'll never forgive them for forcing him out. We sat and watched warnock win promotion after promotion while we fell apart after stupidly letting him leave. We'll do the same again here and be back to complete obscurity through our own stupidity.It sounds to me like we're approaching the end of a brilliant era.
I wonder how people will feel watching Wilder and Knill managing another club to success. Particularly if it isn't going so well at the Lane?
So you are saying that Wilder wanted the board to offer a fee more than what he thought the player was worth. Something which Wilder said he would never do.When I meant agreeable I meant to selling him for what amounted to an amount the board were unwilling to pay. The fee was high in terms of his contract expiring but in terms of our signings and Wilder’s knowledge of what was wrong with O’Connell no wonder he wasn’t happy about it to say the least.
He isn't blameless, but he identified plenty of players who're doing well in the premier league now. We wouldn't pay the wages, so opted for youth / potential.He's brought it on himself with our shite recruitment this season, and our so-so recruitment last season, so hopefully he doesn't chuck the baby out with the bathwater and they can compromise. What I'd like is a transfer team that either Wilder can give targets to and the sort it out, or Wilder can give a 'type' to and they bring back a load of CVs from other places than the Championship, but would that offend him too?
He isn't blameless, but he identified plenty of players who're doing well in the premier league now. We wouldn't pay the wages, so opted for youth / potential.
That policy isn't Wilder's.
Ah yes, Burnley. The one club / manager used every time.We can all identify players we can't afford. The key was knowing who was out there, and it was a big wide world before last Christmas.
And I've never heard anything about us getting outbid by, say, Burnley?
We've got Mouset and Berge - both expensive foreign failures. We had three others last season who were shite.the article points to the signings he wanted, which to me seems a little immaterial, if in January wilder said he wanted messi, Ronaldo and kane does that make him right and the prince wrong, the players mentioned Robinson, Watkins etc were never going to sign for us because the transfer fees were too much, and more importantly we could never compete with other clubs on wages, Wilders net only seems to cover the uk which means the failure to sign quality more likely on financial terms, I think the transfer policy needs widen that net internationally that's where the bargains are
Disappointed that the owner and Wilder couldn't resolve their differences I imagine.
I dont think either side will be anywhere near as good without the other
But it's unlikely he'll ever get full authority like he's had here at any club with a bigger budget than United.I dunno, pre Sheffield United Wilder had been successful. This season will be his first relegation .
Imagine what he'd do with a better resourced Championship club.
I suspect with the Prince we'll end up with a model similar to Watfords. Some people will love that, although it's not my cup of tea.
Going to massively struggle to care as much. I know there's arguments on recruitment being poor etc but I'll never forgive them for forcing him out. We sat and watched warnock win promotion after promotion while we fell apart after stupidly letting him leave. We'll do the same again here and be back to complete obscurity through our own stupidity.
But it's unlikely he'll ever get full authority like he's had here at any club with a bigger budget than United.
We've got Mouset and Berge - both expensive foreign failures. We had three others last season who were shite.
Whilst I accept that our scouting network is too narrow, it's a myth that we haven't looked at foreigners.
The players identified last season weren't Messi and Kane, the were the best of England's second division, and we couldn't afford them. In the end, that's the problem.
I am critical of Wilder's part of the transfer failings this / last season, but there needs to be some context.
We've got Mouset and Berge - both expensive foreign failures. We had three others last season who were shite.
Whilst I accept that our scouting network is too narrow, it's a myth that we haven't looked at foreigners.
The players identified last season weren't Messi and Kane, the were the best of England's second division, and we couldn't afford them. In the end, that's the problem.
I am critical of Wilder's part of the transfer failings this / last season, but there needs to be some context.
Agreed. As far as I'm concerned, CW is as good as we'll ever get for the 'coaching' part of that. Recruitment is harder, and has to be linked with coaching. If (and I'm not saying this is necessarily the case, nor should it be) CW's coaching methods rely on having tough, gritty players who are willing to graft, then it's no good having a separate DoF who bring in a bunch of fancy-Dan types. The DoF and coach have to be absolutely compatible in their fundamentals and ethos. That's easier said than done of course, and some clubs have had nightmares on that front.
We also know (or at least, I suspect) that CW is very stubborn, and he could be resistant to this approach, threatening to leave if that was the case. If it was a choice between 'good coach + average recruitment' and 'average coach + good recruitment', I think I'd prefer the former. I imagine that other people might disagree though.
Which other clubs in the Premier League have wealthy owners that are providing funding for their clubs at the current time.? I do state Premier League clubs, not clubs who were in the Championship where their owners provided funds to get them promoted. I do mean owners that are funding clubs at the current time.This discussion will rumble on, no doubt, hopefully without divisions forming and animosity prevailing
The reality is that we are a top end Championship side, promoted a little too early for our squad development to catch up. We overachieved last season and this season a "perfect storm" of factors have contributed to our relegation.
We are unable to compete with any of the other Premiership Clubs, in terms of wages, simply because we have not got a mega wealthy owner. What is required is for the Prince to get another one of the family members interested and bring them on board (preferably a very wealthy one).
Until that point, we will continue to be unable to compete with other Premiership Clubs on wages and therefore will lose out on players who are looking mainly for a big pay packet.
My personal view is that I would rather see us yo-yo for a few years but maintain a sustainable Club, rather than doing what many others have done and risk going bust by paying unsustainable wages and fees. The proviso for me is that we must be playing entertaining football and have players who give 100% for the fans and the Club.
UTB & FTP
What was Jack Robinson signed for if it wasnt cover for JOC ? Pointless signing cover if when its needed u decide it's not good enoughYes he wanted him in close season to which both club and player were amenable, the board wouldn’t stump up the fee. In between start of season and jan the ship had sailed (fact) and he was not happy.
True Smirth and theres a reason DoF is popular....it enables continuity and a club ethos to be established with players signed to fit into that ethos.Can't help but think Wilder is making a massive mistake here. If he wants to establish himself as a Premier League manager then he needs to accept the model which the Prince wants to bring in. The vast majority of clubs at this level have a sporting director, director of football or similar so he better get used to it.
Yep, wouldn’t it be terrible if we signed the next Henrikh Mkhitaryan?Director of football decides an Armenian version of Adam Reach is what we need. There you go Chris get us into Europe![]()
We'll just have to disagree. Big budgets = DoFI don't think you can make that assumption.
I would imagine Wilder will have no shortage of clubs after him, and he can stipulate the conditions
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?