Blade58
Once a Blade, always a daft ****
Has he been sacked or walked away?
We know he won’t put up with others making signing decisions
We know he won’t put up with others making signing decisions
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
Jimmy the Rambler is currently live, discussing it..........
We know he loves to do a bit of clickbaity stuff but he claims that hes heard from a few good "sources"
Or it shows that they bought time to undertake a root and branch review of the club and to plan the direction they wanted to take, and that process has now concluded.Spot on, especially when they gave him a new deal at the start of the year. Shows an erratic nature and no sort of long-term plan.
Hes just said that hes 95% certain Wilder is gone.................You know things are serious when Ramble's doing his peekaboo face
Tbf to Jimmy, if he wanted attention, he surely wouldn't choose to do it at this time of day when a lot of people won't have the luxury of being online to follow along?Hes just said that hes 95% certain Wilder is gone.................
but why is he the only one that seems to be reporting this?????
Possibly just for attention/likes/subscriptions? it would be easy to later say that he was only reporting what he had heard from "respectable sources" but they got it wrong.
If he gets lucky, he can spout about being the one to break the news and get more subscriptions........
Hes just said that hes 95% certain Wilder is gone.................
but why is he the only one that seems to be reporting this?????
Possibly just for attention/likes/subscriptions? it would be easy to later say that he was only reporting what he had heard from "respectable sources" but they got it wrong.
If he gets lucky, he can spout about being the one to break the news and get more subscriptions........
Hopefully they would already have a replacement lined up if Wilder does leave. Time will tell.Or it shows that they bought time to undertake a root and branch review of the club and to plan the direction they wanted to take, and that process has now concluded.
Thats a fair point.Tbf to Jimmy, if he wanted attention, he surely wouldn't choose to do it at this time of day when a lot of people won't have the luxury of being online to follow along?
Most of the reporters with links to the clubs are mates with Wilder, so may be holding back. Who knows anyway. We will find out soon, I suspect.Thats a fair point.
But you would have thought that there are a load of reported with links to the club that would have received this kind of info before the likes of a vlogger?
That new deal would have been heavily incentivised. We were 2nd when Wilder signed his new deal at the end of January, two points behind Leeds with 17 matches to go. It probably also contained a clause allowing us to part ways with him with a defined settlement should we fail to be promoted.Spot on, especially when they gave him a new deal at the start of the year. Shows an erratic nature and no sort of long-term plan.
This. If it's happened, it's the result of a thorough consideration of all evidence, both in terms of objective results and subjective plans.Or it shows that they bought time to undertake a root and branch review of the club and to plan the direction they wanted to take, and that process has now concluded.
Im not on here for sacking Chris but I doubt it would go to that extreme either
Context for this please?Loath to bring it up again but after the Baldock incident and the paywall debacle, I wouldn't trust him as far as I can throw him
When Baldock passed, before the club had issued a statement or anyone proper had confirmed anything, he was straight on live talking about it - he gets paid for clicks, views and people can pay to get messages read out. He was monetising it.Context for this please?
I have plenty of criticisms of Wilder recently but can't help but think this would be a big mistake. If he was going he should have gone already
We'll be entering a very unpredictable phase, depending on who the owners decide to appoint - and nothing would surprise me
He'll claim it was rumours or he was misinformed and pretend it never happenedCant see ramble coming out and saying this if its bull .Blokes packed in his job to do this full time it kill his channel if he's lying
I think it's the opposite.If these owners are sacking A manager after 92 points - we are fucked
It’s the next Hull city approach imo. Showing they don’t have a clue about managing a football club imo. No patience and no plan.
If you do what you always do, you'll get what you always got.Where does it end though
If you play this (to me knee jerk approach) to the 2 extremes we
1 become a basket case club - sacking managers Willy nilly and with no longer term plan. Every manager is a risk despite the track records - look at Slav and what he did here. This doesn’t feel like a healthy approach after he’s signed a new contract
2 - slim chance we become a Bournemouth or Brentford. We excel on player trading using a clever recruitment strategy. Feels unlikely though.
I can’t see there is much middle ground if you are getting rid of someone who was (arguably) VAR away from taking us up. And with a points total which would have made the season a success more often than not
We got 92 points, but how many of the were as a result of outplaying the opposition Vs relying on having better players than the opposition.I think it's the opposite.
The football last season was shocking. And he didn't get a tune remotely out of our 'big money' signing.
I think the owners have seen what's happened, the stupid on field fighting, the comments aimed at the fans when he got the mardies on in our 3 game blow up run, paired with the football on display, and of course the data which backs up we over performed our expected points this season - and they've probably come to that decision.
Do I think it's harsh? Yes.
Would I sack him after 92 points? Probably not.
But these owners are all in on this data driven model. We either get on board and trust them to deliver us something special or go back to the boring football of last season.
Leap into the unknown is pretty exciting if you ask me. And I think as a club it's what we need.
I really hope you're right. It's a big decision coming by the board in who they appoint next. If fifteen games into next season and we are below mid table it will dent their credibility and half of this forum will be frothing at the mouth for the next change in manager.I think it's the opposite.
The football last season was shocking. And he didn't get a tune remotely out of our 'big money' signing.
I think the owners have seen what's happened, the stupid on field fighting, the comments aimed at the fans when he got the mardies on in our 3 game blow up run, paired with the football on display, and of course the data which backs up we over performed our expected points this season - and they've probably come to that decision.
Do I think it's harsh? Yes.
Would I sack him after 92 points? Probably not.
But these owners are all in on this data driven model. We either get on board and trust them to deliver us something special or go back to the boring football of last season.
Leap into the unknown is pretty exciting if you ask me. And I think as a club it's what we need.
I can totally see whyWe got 92 points, but how many of the were as a result of outplaying the opposition Vs relying on having better players than the opposition.
Imagine how many point we'd have had if we had a defined style of play and plan of attack.
Our style was score one more than you and defend - but could have been much more.
92 points is a fantastic achievement. But the stats imply we over performed by c 20 points.
If he has gone, I can kind of see why.
I hope so too, it's exciting to me at least as it means they actually have a plan. But it's a huge call.I really hope you're right. It's a big decision coming by the board in who they appoint next. If fifteen games into next season and we are below mid table it will dent their credibility and half of this forum will be frothing at the mouth for the next change in manager.
When I saw us linked with the same players we always are and McBurnie (I liked McBurnie but let’s move on) I was kind of ready for Wilder to go.I think it's the opposite.
The football last season was shocking. And he didn't get a tune remotely out of our 'big money' signing.
I think the owners have seen what's happened, the stupid on field fighting, the comments aimed at the fans when he got the mardies on in our 3 game blow up run, paired with the football on display, and of course the data which backs up we over performed our expected points this season - and they've probably come to that decision.
Do I think it's harsh? Yes.
Would I sack him after 92 points? Probably not.
But these owners are all in on this data driven model. We either get on board and trust them to deliver us something special or go back to the boring football of last season.
Leap into the unknown is pretty exciting if you ask me. And I think as a club it's what we need.
Given how the signings went in January - work permit struggles, nowhere near the first team, not exactly young - I’m not filled with confidence. Recognise it’s early on that though.I hope so too, it's exciting to me at least as it means they actually have a plan. But it's a huge call.
It’s always the same, porkers like this know the intimate workings of our club, we know nothing, we should be embarrassed.Porktalk poster. Probs same source?
Ronnie Starling
Posted 12 minutes ago
The word from my United colleagues is that Wilder is about to leave
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?