Berkshire Blade
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 11, 2009
- Messages
- 15,351
- Reaction score
- 29,179
Not on the football side of the business though!They’ve just appointed someone that’s spent 10 years on the board at Barcelona.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
Not on the football side of the business though!They’ve just appointed someone that’s spent 10 years on the board at Barcelona.
He sounds like a marketing / branding guy for the club not someone advising on the football.Dídac Lee
Dídac Lee is a Managing Partner at Galdana Ventures. He spent a decade on the board of directors of FC Barcelona, where he founded and led Barça Digital and Barça Studios, transforming the club into a global reference in digital innovation, content and fan engagement. Over the past 20 years, he has founded and scaled multiple technology companies, creating platforms and businesses that today employ more than 1,500 people worldwide and generate over €800m in annual revenue.
![]()
New Strategic Advisory Committee
Sheffield United is pleased to announce the formation of a newly created Strategic Advisory Committee.www.sufc.co.uk
Did he have ear defenders and goggles on during board meetings?Not on the football side of the business though!
Does the hospital canteen assistant manager know how to do a lung transplant?Did he have ear defenders and goggles on during board meetings?
Yeah that’s a totally fair comparison.Does the hospital canteen assistant manager know how to do a lung transplant?
Maybe a slightly sarcastic reply but what part of this screams "football man"?Yeah that’s a totally fair comparison.
Pillock.
"Hey Siri, give me a list of Eastern European players who are available on a free and also have experience in the building trade and can repair football stands"I can see a world where these chatGPT Bulgarians are all unveiled in S6 in the not too distant future…
There was this young lad in the academy squad a few years ago who all the backroom staff were saying was amazing and needed starting, kept banging goals in and providing assists, but Wilder kept refusing to play him.I struggle to buy into a conspiracy that Wilder has seen them carving up in training and refuses to use them because they're not his signings.

There was this young lad in the academy squad a few years ago who all the backroom staff were saying was amazing and needed starting, kept banging goals in and providing assists, but Wilder kept refusing to play him.
Got his debut as a sub under Hecky and then scored two goals on his first start the following season.
Wilder must have been right about him not being good enough though, because I can't for the life of me remember his name or what happened to him?
View attachment 229812
I was told my story by a player who was in the first team squad at the time.I was told by someone ITK that Wilder was not refusing to play Ndiaye because he did not rate him. Wilder was not playing him at the direction of the club because Ndiaye would not use the agent that the club wanted him to use, who the club pressures all of the junior players to engage. Ndiaye and his family wanted someone else. In the end, the club blinked first, and a new deal was agreed with Ndiaye's preferred agent prior to the Peterborough game.
I do not have any difficulty in believing Wilder would not play a youth teamer at that time. We brought virtually no one through during his first tenure. But there was another reason.I was told my story by a player who was in the first team squad at the time.
Probably some truth in both stories, as is usually the way with these things
And the other reason was……?………. But there was another reason.
Set out in my post upthread.And the other reason was……?
Players from our academy who played league games under Wilder in his first spell (not including players sold and re-signed):
He didn't play much until he signed a new contract at the start of the following season. Remember the Prince talking it up as "the signing of the season" etcThere was this young lad in the academy squad a few years ago who all the backroom staff were saying was amazing and needed starting, kept banging goals in and providing assists, but Wilder kept refusing to play him.
Got his debut as a sub under Hecky and then scored two goals on his first start the following season.
Wilder must have been right about him not being good enough though, because I can't for the life of me remember his name or what happened to him?
View attachment 229812
Which of those were ready for breaking into our successful teams?Players from our academy who played league games under Wilder in his first spell (not including players sold and re-signed):
David Brooks, 30 games (21 as sub)
George Long, 3 games
Ben Whiteman, 2 games (both as sub)
Jake Eastwood, 1 game (as a sub)
Regan Slater, 1 game (as a sub)
Antwoine Hackford, 1 game (as a sub)
Not exactly the Busby Babes, is it?
And of course Brooks was off out on loan until Wilder was talked into keeping him in the squad after his impressive friendly displays.
OrEither we owe money to Bord's company if they make appearances in the first team, or Wilder is being stubborn and refusing to acknowledge anything to do with Bord in case it legitimises him and his AI stuff. The fact that Ukaki, Nwachukwu, Polendekov and Zatterstrom were all in the development teams before disappearing without a trace once Bord's name appeared in the takeover stuff, would suggest it's a Wilder thing.
This lad who wilder refused to play was training with the first team during the period wilder was at loggerheads with the prince and left the club! That doesn't sound like Wilder was refusing to play him.There was this young lad in the academy squad a few years ago who all the backroom staff were saying was amazing and needed starting, kept banging goals in and providing assists, but Wilder kept refusing to play him.
Got his debut as a sub under Hecky and then scored two goals on his first start the following season.
Wilder must have been right about him not being good enough though, because I can't for the life of me remember his name or what happened to him?
View attachment 229812
And of course Brooks was off out on loan until Wilder was talked into keeping him in the squad after his impressive friendly displays.
Yes, I'm sure the things you've read on here and Bladesmad are in a much better position to know what went on than an actual first team player at the timeThis lad who wilder refused to play was training with the first team during the period wilder was at loggerheads with the prince and left the club! That doesn't sound like Wilder was refusing to play him.
He was a nieve young kid with bags of talent Hecki came in and brought him on at Leicester he found it tough not ready for the first team.He then disappeared due to contract problems.
The serb came in and the contract situation was resolved to rear it's head down the line.
He was ripping it up in training! Alan Knill said " he keeps the ball like he owns it " that doesn't mean he could do it in the prem! Heckie tried him and he was totally lost in a team who had there chins on the ground (wilder gone) at Leicester.
That was it as I said he disappeared to re-appear under the Serb.He was fantastic that season !
Would he have done it under Wilder in the prem ?
I would like to think he would but I doubt it.
He's playing at top level now and I think there's more to come from him ! Meaning ! he will get even better in the next few years.
Why would Wilder refuse to play him?Yes, I'm sure the things you've read on here and Bladesmad are in a much better position to know what went on than an actual first team player at the time
You'd have to ask him.Why would Wilder refuse to play him?
Don’t buy that for a second, all the youth players have different agents (it’s fairly easy to check who anyone over 18 is with). It also doesn’t explain why he was so keen to flog him to Barnsley until the club vetoed it.I was told by someone ITK that Wilder was not refusing to play Ndiaye because he did not rate him. Wilder was not playing him at the direction of the club because Ndiaye would not use the agent that the club wanted him to use, who the club pressures all of the junior players to engage. Ndiaye and his family wanted someone else. In the end, the club blinked first, and a new deal was agreed with Ndiaye's preferred agent prior to the Peterborough game.
Maybe he was onto something considering how we lost a talent so cheaplyDon’t buy that for a second, all the youth players have different agents (it’s fairly easy to check who anyone over 18 is with). It also doesn’t explain why he was so keen to flog him to Barnsley until the club vetoed it.
More like Wilder froze him out because he wouldn’t use Paul Martin.
This chimes with what I’ve been told by various people who would know.You'd have to ask him.
I could hazard a guess, going from what I've been told...and it's similar to why Femi and Brooks often get such a hard time from him.
I think mainly he's just got an aversion to youth players, especially ones who don't get down the pub & sink 10 peroni
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?