Sean Thornton
I say a little prayer….
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2015
- Messages
- 64,345
- Reaction score
- 113,773
sell Brooks and use the money to remove the pillars on the kop, everybody's happy.
Leg room?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
sell Brooks and use the money to remove the pillars on the kop, everybody's happy.
Push Brooks out of the door and you push Wilder closer to it as well. It's as simple as that.
It all depends on what we're content with. Where we see ourselves in the game.
We've seen countless examples of failure when it comes to flashing the cash recently. Our neighbours and Birmingham being the two that instantly spring to mind.
Those failures are down to giving money to the wrong people, and not having a proper structure in the way it was being spent. The way Birmingham were spending in the summer under Redknapp was hilarious and always destined to fail.
We have a manager who has worked miracles with what he's had. He has a clear way of playing, and gets the best out of his players.
If the backing was there, there's no doubt in my mind that Wilder could assemble a squad of players to hammer this league.
But, it's not. We all know that things coming together like this are extremely rare. An extra push from those in charge would get us to the next level.
The only conclusions we can draw are that:
Our owners are content with where we are as a club, and have little desire to see us promoted.
They simply don't have the financial muscle to do it.
Or both.
So, are we happy with competing as a Championship club, and hoping that Wilder can pull off a miracle. Or are we fuming that the backing is all but non existent?
I know as fans we all naturally want more. But with how we're set up from top to bottom, this is our level right now.
Do you really think that it’s “the £s that keep rolling in” to Bramall Lane that make Kevin McCabe a wealthy man?
One important aspect that people have not mentioned is that what if there is a sell on clause in DB's contract and we have no choice but to sell if it's activated???
He could go even if the board and CW does not want him to, surely?
This is pretty much the only thing I agree with on this 4 page thread.
We need better than Cole and we need more committed players than Holmes and Sinclair.
We pretty much swept up all the lower league players we wanted at the beginning of the season and this proved a great policy, we were 'automatic' before the shit hit the fan.
Therefore the search for good talent has started again but what is available has been depleted (by United).
Everybody stop going crackers spending other peoples' money; we're fresh out of the third tier, haven't got billionaire owners, have suffered enormous misfortune and are still a decent bet for the playoffs.
Do you really think that it’s “the £’s that keep rolling in” to Bramall Lane that make Kevin McCabe a wealthy man?
Do you really think that it’s “the £’s that keep rolling in” to Bramall Lane that make Kevin McCabe a wealthy man?
I took a wheelbarrow full of cash in as tribute to Kev in this morning. There were hundreds of others doing the same. He was stood watching us in the window wearing a solid gold top hat, a huge gold chain with a diamond £ sign, smoking a huge Cuban cigar holding a gun to Wilders dogs head.
I took a wheelbarrow full of cash in as tribute to Kev in this morning. There were hundreds of others doing the same. He was stood watching us in the window wearing a solid gold top hat, a huge gold chain with a diamond £ sign, smoking a huge Cuban cigar holding a gun to Wilders dogs head.
Some of us might call that buying a ticket or merchandise, mcCabe is a good man but he doesn't have the wealth needed to push the club to the next level, we can only hope that like Bassett (sorry Pinchy) before him we manage to unearth some gems and do it that way
How can you say that without knowing who the loans are?
If someone else is paying....Think you’re exaggerating, Kev doesn’t smoke....
10m for a lad who was originally going on loan to Chesterfield is unbelievable value, especially with a loan back. I wouldn't blame the board personally, but do hope they give Wilder some money so it's not just 1 perm in this January.
Also says he’s after 1 perm signing rest being loans.
Seems backing may be lacking - if you’ll excuse my poetry... surprises none of us I imagine.
Sod the kop pillars, I’d rather have more leg roomsell Brooks and use the money to remove the pillars on the kop, everybody's happy.
Isn’t this the key point tho? Our squad needs strengthening and he’s not YET regularly producing something out of nothing. Going into the 2nd half of the season relying on him to do so would be the bigger mistake.
But all of this comes back to why can’t we strengthen without selling. If we could/did The entire situation changes.
I've listened twice to the interview now and never heard Wilder quantity the nature of the deals he wants. I heard him saying 4 players but not that one was permanent - obviously Leonard - and the rest loans, despite Andy Giddings tweet. Am I missing something?
To be honest, if a club came in and offered £10 million for Brooks, I'd take it. I'd rather not sell him but if we replaced him with someone good, it wouldn't be the end of the world.
RE: schoolboy looks
Pretty telling he’s come out and said this. Would sicken me if we had a Saudi Prince on board, all McCabe’s spiel about not selling our best players now we’re up etc and then sell him anyway against the managers wishes.
It’s not. It’s light. It should be £15m at least. And no derisory deferment or based on clauses. Anything less is absolutely negligent.
I've also listened to the interview and I also didnt hear CW mention loan signings?? Giddings said this in his tweet. Unless we are both missing something....
He mentioned players going out as loans or permanents but not the same detail on players coming in.
Think you’re exaggerating, Kev doesn’t smoke....
Bit nieve SM. If we sold Brooke's for £10m have a guess at how much would go to CW to build the team? He'd be lucky to see £2m
Backing is certainly lacking. I’m surprised he doesn’t actually want to sell Brooks, given the resourcevon offer.Also says he’s after 1 perm signing rest being loans.
Seems backing may be lacking - if you’ll excuse my poetry... surprises none of us I imagine.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?