Wright1889
Member
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2017
- Messages
- 555
- Reaction score
- 1,031
We brought him in as cover for Souza, got the best right back in the championship.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
He was our man of the match. Thought him and Brewster on the right looked solid defensively and seemed to cause a threat.Just a shout out for this lad today, I thought he was outstanding![]()
Don’t think Brooks for Brewster was the issue. The issue was taking the second striker off and expecting Moore to start using his feet. I like O’Hare but he’s a totally different player to Campbell.He was our man of the match. Thought him and Brewster on the right looked solid defensively and seemed to cause a threat.
Then the tracksuits to took Brewster off and the rest is history....
We've got option to buyLeicester are in trouble. Sadly for us I think the at means he will be a regular there next season
Despite his energy, thought Brooks gave the ball away for too easily(as did most of them second half) which was the major difference.Don’t think Brooks for Brewster was the issue. The issue was taking the second striker off and expecting Moore to start using his feet. I like O’Hare but he’s a totally different player to Campbell.
BBD neshing that tackle and getting hurt was ridiculous. Particularly as it came after a dreadful touch.Despite his energy, thought Brooks gave the ball away for too easily(as did most of them second half) which was the major difference.
You're right the o'Hare/Moore combo never looked great in the first half of the season, so why we defaulted to it today is baffling.
It really is like he's managing an Under 9's team and he's promised game time to some of the parents. There was no reason at all for BBD or Brooks to see the pitch today.
We'll to disagree amicably on that one, because as much Chaudhery was our best player, i thought Brewster wasn't far behind him. Thought it was his best game in a long time but Wilder had it in his head Brewster was coming off.BBD neshing that tackle and getting hurt was ridiculous. Particularly as it came after a dreadful touch.
There was no reason to change it after 65 minutes. We were fine. I still think Brooks for Brewster (who had just been booked) wasn’t the worst change but it should have been at 75/80 mins when we’d let Sunderland punch themselves out.
Choudary was excellent today in my opinion.We'll to disagree amicably on that one, because as much Chaudhery was our best player, i thought Brewster wasn't far behind him. Thought it was his best game in a long time but Wilder had it in his head Brewster was coming off.
Peck was overawed today and Tom Davies for him at 65 mins would have been a much more fluid change and reacting to what was happening.
But BBD has been awful since returning and seeing him get a run out today was absolutely baffling. For starters he's not played for over a month....
Called it after 20 mins. Pecks game is based on an explosive first movement which buys him the time/space and today he looked slow/heavy/confused/nervous. Meant he never bought himself that half a yard and as result kept getting caught in possessions and giving the ball away.Choudary was excellent today in my opinion.
The game was literally crying out for Tom Davies.
Completely agree. I get Davies has been injured but he’s looked class whenever I have seen him. When we clearly needed composure and experience in the middle of the park, Davies should have been brought on.Called it after 20 mins. Pecks game is based on an explosive first movement which buys him the time/space and today he looked slow/heavy/confused/nervous. Meant he never bought himself that half a yard and as result kept getting caught in possessions and giving the ball away.
A more proactive manager sees this and changes it....
As their manager pivoted to having midfield runners, bringing on O Hare and Davies with Canon on to replace Moore to replicate their system and stretch them would have been a more imaginative shift rather than bringing his mates on for a kick about....Completely agree. I get Davies has been injured but he’s looked class whenever I have seen him. When we clearly needed composure and experience in the middle of the park, Davies should have been brought on.
Tells a clear story to me. Most could not give a flying f.ck.He appeared to be the only 1 devastated at the result. Had to be consold by a few players
I said it before today, Campbell and O'Hare link up really well and suggested starting Cannon and Moore and bringing on Campbell and O'Hare together as subs in the second half. Splitting them up made us weaker. Sunderland did see more down the right side after Brewster went off.Don’t think Brooks for Brewster was the issue. The issue was taking the second striker off and expecting Moore to start using his feet. I like O’Hare but he’s a totally different player to Campbell.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?