Charming pig tweet

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Bill Johnson

Active Member
Joined
Aug 17, 2018
Messages
1,308
Reaction score
2,287
Check the More disgraceful tweets from our lot on Porktalk.
 



I seldom visit that site but there are some corking comments floating around tonight, particularly on the thread regarding the video of Mr. Chansiri giving some back to a few knuckle draggers outside whilst he's having a fag.

"Ironically if he left we wouldn’t be able to afford to change the lettering on the North Stand seats"

:D
 
Racist tweet made toward Leon Knight. Out of order. People need to learn. Unless I’ve misread something I’ve seen
 
Why fanny about with this?
Leon Knight basically says "bang your money on utd to do Wendy".
Pig responded with "wog".
Blatant racism and I hope the twat finds himself arrested and charged for it.

No surprise.
 
Why fanny about with this?
Leon Knight basically says "bang your money on utd to do Wendy".
Pig responded with "wog".
Blatant racism and I hope the twat finds himself arrested and charged for it.

Can you get charged for calling someone a wog?
 



Why fanny about with this?
Leon Knight basically says "bang your money on utd to do Wendy".
Pig responded with "wog".
Blatant racism and I hope the twat finds himself arrested and charged for it.

It’s the internet. Apparently you can do what the fuck you want in the interests of free speech.

Perhaps the lads spellchecker fell over? Then again, perhaps he is a racist cunt. Either are possible.
 
It’s the internet. Apparently you can do what the fuck you want in the interests of free speech.

Perhaps the lads spellchecker fell over? Then again, perhaps he is a racist cunt. Either are possible.

The use of racist terms & phrases is fairly well governed by the law I think.

Being ‘offended’ was the issue that was discussed in the other thread. In my humble opinion, the extent of free speech has to be wide and it’s outer limits defended. Otherwise it is slowly eroded, reduced in scope and has its objectives defeated. ‘Offense’ is how blasphemy is currently being rebranded and brought back as a concept in Europe.
 
The use of racist terms & phrases is fairly well governed by the law I think.

Being ‘offended’ was the issue that was discussed in the other thread. In my humble opinion, the extent of free speech has to be wide and it’s outer limits defended. Otherwise it is slowly eroded, reduced in scope and has its objectives defeated. ‘Offense’ is how blasphemy is currently being rebranded and brought back as a concept in Europe.

All well and good but blatant use of racist language doesn’t come as acceptable in my book. There are grey areas and this isn’t one of them.

Free speech comes with a level of responsibility. Just because you are online doesn’t change that.
 
Last edited:
All well and good but blatant use of racist language doesn’t come as acceptable in my book. There are grey areas and this isn’t one of them.


Couldn't agree more.
Any player can get slated but the absolute only comments must be restricted to his ability as a footballer. Ie the job he is paid to do. There should never be any reference to any other aspect of his being.

The target in this instance no longer plays but thats irrelevant.
 
Couldn't agree more.
Any player can get slated but the absolute only comments must be restricted to his ability as a footballer. Ie the job he is paid to do. There should never be any reference to any other aspect of his being.

The target in this instance no longer plays but thats irrelevant.

So no comments about hairstyle, clothing, physical features (non racial), accent/voice? All out of bounds? No characaturing? You think Bob Mortimer’s Athletico Mince stuff on Beardsley & McClaren is ott?
 
So no comments about hairstyle, clothing, physical features (non racial), accent/voice? All out of bounds? No characaturing? You think Bob Mortimer’s Athletico Mince stuff on Beardsley & McClaren is ott?


I'm talking about fundamental core issues that are non negotiable. Colour gender religion sexual orientation.
 
I'm talking about fundamental core issues that are non negotiable. Colour gender religion sexual orientation.
The Religion thing is interesting.
If a Club Manager appears to believe the Earth was created in six days not all that long ago by a man with a beard who somehow lives in the sky in a way that can't really be explained, despite the evidence of, say, dinosaur fossils. Then I think their ability to choose a decent overlapping Wing Half may be in question.
 
The Religion thing is interesting.
If a Club Manager appears to believe the Earth was created in six days not all that long ago by a man with a beard who somehow lives in the sky in a way that can't really be explained, despite the evidence of, say, dinosaur fossils. Then I think their ability to choose a decent overlapping Wing Half may be in question.

Well Wilder created a reborn SUFC pretty quickly so he must be God and SUFC is our religion so you may be onto something there Phil.
 
Clearly they are the most classless morons of football
 
The use of racist terms & phrases is fairly well governed by the law I think.

Being ‘offended’ was the issue that was discussed in the other thread. In my humble opinion, the extent of free speech has to be wide and it’s outer limits defended. Otherwise it is slowly eroded, reduced in scope and has its objectives defeated. ‘Offense’ is how blasphemy is currently being rebranded and brought back as a concept in Europe.
amen bro. quality comment
 



All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom