Bill Johnson
Active Member
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2018
- Messages
- 1,308
- Reaction score
- 2,287
- Banned
- #1
Check the More disgraceful tweets from our lot on Porktalk.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
Thanks for that....
say what ?Check the More disgraceful tweets from our lot on Porktalk.
say what ?
Ha ha just read itIt's the thread title. Been locked now but there to be seen.
So fucking what?Check the More disgraceful tweets from our lot on Porktalk.
Why fanny about with this?
Leon Knight basically says "bang your money on utd to do Wendy".
Pig responded with "wog".
Blatant racism and I hope the twat finds himself arrested and charged for it.
Why fanny about with this?
Leon Knight basically says "bang your money on utd to do Wendy".
Pig responded with "wog".
Blatant racism and I hope the twat finds himself arrested and charged for it.
I’d like to think so.Can you get charged for calling someone a wog?
I’d like to think so.
Why fanny about with this?
Leon Knight basically says "bang your money on utd to do Wendy".
Pig responded with "wog".
Blatant racism and I hope the twat finds himself arrested and charged for it.
Hopefully.Can you get charged for calling someone a wog?
It’s the internet. Apparently you can do what the fuck you want in the interests of free speech.
Perhaps the lads spellchecker fell over? Then again, perhaps he is a racist cunt. Either are possible.
The use of racist terms & phrases is fairly well governed by the law I think.
Being ‘offended’ was the issue that was discussed in the other thread. In my humble opinion, the extent of free speech has to be wide and it’s outer limits defended. Otherwise it is slowly eroded, reduced in scope and has its objectives defeated. ‘Offense’ is how blasphemy is currently being rebranded and brought back as a concept in Europe.
All well and good but blatant use of racist language doesn’t come as acceptable in my book. There are grey areas and this isn’t one of them.
Couldn't agree more.
Any player can get slated but the absolute only comments must be restricted to his ability as a footballer. Ie the job he is paid to do. There should never be any reference to any other aspect of his being.
The target in this instance no longer plays but thats irrelevant.
So no comments about hairstyle, clothing, physical features (non racial), accent/voice? All out of bounds? No characaturing? You think Bob Mortimer’s Athletico Mince stuff on Beardsley & McClaren is ott?
The Religion thing is interesting.I'm talking about fundamental core issues that are non negotiable. Colour gender religion sexual orientation.
The Religion thing is interesting.
If a Club Manager appears to believe the Earth was created in six days not all that long ago by a man with a beard who somehow lives in the sky in a way that can't really be explained, despite the evidence of, say, dinosaur fossils. Then I think their ability to choose a decent overlapping Wing Half may be in question.
amen bro. quality commentThe use of racist terms & phrases is fairly well governed by the law I think.
Being ‘offended’ was the issue that was discussed in the other thread. In my humble opinion, the extent of free speech has to be wide and it’s outer limits defended. Otherwise it is slowly eroded, reduced in scope and has its objectives defeated. ‘Offense’ is how blasphemy is currently being rebranded and brought back as a concept in Europe.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?