ucandomagic
Well-Known Member
If they want to sell them (and that's fair enough if we'll get good money) it's in their best interests to get them on longer contracts. We've just lost Ramsdale for 800k rather than £3m+ because he only had 6 months left rather than 3 years.
We've just lost (?) Ramsdale for £800K. What did we pay for Hanson, Carruthers and O'Shea?
We have an Academy with a reputation to attract top young lads and the more we move them to Prem and Champ clubs the more we can use that money to good effect and the more we attract more young talent to the Academy. Would the Robins have paid £3m just because his contract was longer - I don't think so.
UTB