blades1977
New Member
- Joined
- Apr 25, 2026
- Messages
- 18
- Reaction score
- 13
Honestly I say 1-0 nil MansfieldIve had £160 on us to lose at Mansfield...
Strange bet I agree
However I hope it comes in cos im skintish
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
Honestly I say 1-0 nil MansfieldIve had £160 on us to lose at Mansfield...
Strange bet I agree
However I hope it comes in cos im skintish
I don’t think some on here.will give him the time to get to that point! However, I do think that saying it makes some people feel better.Prediction. If we lose the first couple of games, mardy arse will stick his bottom lip out and sulks his way out again.
If we lose tomorrow and next Saturday, both games on tv i can see fans start to turn against wilder and the board.
He wasn’t that good before his injury out of the 12 games he played he was awful in 4 of themSeems to be a lot of people giving arblaster a good season
Wasn't tremendous after his comeback last year
Very few players recover 100 % from that injury and our medical staff are hardly phenomenal
IMO Peck is too good for us mate … he’s got an extremely high ceiling for development and the best skill of all… he’s always availableThe preseason yes. But i do think he should be starting, ahead of Peck. I dont see what Peck does if im honest.
That is true. Availability trumps all.IMO Peck is too good for us mate … he’s got an extremely high ceiling for development and the best skill of all… he’s always available
You can’t really build an identity or togetherness or culture with loans as they go backI don’t think loans and free are riskier in any way really. Yeah if we get them wrong the worst case is we get relegated.
If we gamble and spend money we don’t have then failing could result in a much worse outcome.
A few teams are "spending and strengthening". But the vast majority of squads are the same owing to the World Cup and the new ESC rules. The number of Championship transfers so far this window is half of that in League Two.And keep us up this year? Because this squad without Gus who’s definitely off is bottom 4/5 in the league. Everyone else spending and strengthening. We look doomed.
This. This is exactly what I've been talking about in the Hamer thread.You can’t really build an identity or togetherness or culture with loans as they go back
I actually understand we have to sell players but I’d like to see some signings of a lower calibre coming in as I understand they won’t be the same standard but young players from lower leagues who are worth a gamble …
Once again we look like we are scratching around for the cast offs
This. This is exactly what I've been talking about in the Hamer thread.
God knows how much money we've wasted on loaned players in the last two seasons, when if you looked at it, you could find some real gems in the lower leagues that could generate more funds in the future.
For example we paid a £1m loan fee on Soumare last season, and imagine we spent a good amount on wages, whereas we could have found somebody from league's 1+2 on less wages for a similar fee and would be our player. Its like renting a house. Yes you can loan players and the overall responsibility is the parent club, but its not how we should be operating as a club.
Mate, 6 loans in both of the last two seasons, criminal. 2 seasons ago we had 3 right backs on loan....A loan should be to bring in a McAtee or a MGW. Someone who is of a quality we cannot afford to supplement a well rounded squad.
We shouldn’t be loaning squad fillers and utility players ever.
Mate, 6 loans in both of the last two seasons, criminal. 2 seasons ago we had 3 right backs on loan....
I genuinely think the January 2025 window was as bad as the summer 2025 one.
To be honest I would take that now, i have a fear its going too be far bleaker than that.My prediction for the season is boringly lower mid-table.
A slow and dull start with not many goals and more draws than wins.
Followed by an uptick of three or four games before Christmas where it looks like they've all remembered how to play football, coincidentally timed to quell the talks of getting a new manager in before the January transfer window.
Someone inevitably posts a gushing thread about the charge for the automatic places being on.
The only business in January is an ageing journeyman brought in who we won't see actually play until April. O'Hare leaves after downing tools because he misses Gus too much to function.
Revert to form from February onwards, grinding out narrow victories and indifferent losses before limping over the line on 1st May.
Wilder claims it was "unlucky".
Im on about when we spunked £10m on cannon, brought in holding, bbd, Choudhury and harry clarke on loan. But we wouldn't pay the necessary money for Jonjoe Kenny who was begging to come, and Jimmy Dunne, who would have been perfect. It would have set summer 2025 up much better for whoever was in charge.Philips and Rothwell were awful business. Really were.
We’d been on a decent run and with the right business we might have had a push. Our midfielders were on their arse with niggles and fatigue but they decide to bring in two midfielders who were at best weeks away from being impactful to the first team.
1-1 but we win on penalties with a bit of badge slapping thrown in.Honestly I say 1-0 nil Mansfield
Yes.Could some fans become more negative than they are already?
Exactly … loans to supplement not as the main model of recruitmentThis. This is exactly what I've been talking about in the Hamer thread.
God knows how much money we've wasted on loaned players in the last two seasons, when if you looked at it, you could find some real gems in the lower leagues that could generate more funds in the future.
For example we paid a £1m loan fee on Soumare last season, and imagine we spent a good amount on wages, whereas we could have found somebody from league's 1+2 on less wages for a similar fee and would be our player. Its like renting a house. Yes you can loan players and the overall responsibility is the parent club, but its not how we should be operating as a club.
Yep. It screams asset stripping, but apparently our owners are running the business normally according to the plebs on this forum. Unbelievable.Exactly … loans to supplement not as the main model of recruitment
I was hopeful when they took over but my opinion has changed I think they saw it as a quick buckYep. It screams asset stripping, but apparently our owners are running the business normally according to the plebs on this forum. Unbelievable.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?