Brooks to Man Poo

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?


For Man U they have money to burn so whether its £30, 40 or 50m is irrelevant. Their main objective would be to get the deal over the line in the timescale which suits them so this would be the overriding factor, not price. They are also trying to shake off the turgidity of the Mourinho era and a player like Brooks would set the place alight. He would be a blast at Old Trafford.
 
He wouldn't be worth whatever Man U are willing to pay Bournemouth if he'd stayed here, his value has risen because he has the Premiership experience and been proven to be able to play well there.

Don't forget that he wanted to leave, or his agent wanted him to and convinced him.

If we end up with £15m, £18m or £20m we've done well, very well


You’re absolutely right, and it’s the same with maguire..

If he doesn’t shine at hull, Leicester don’t buy him, if he doesn’t play and establish himself there he doesn’t play for England, if he doesn’t excel then there’s no huge valuation for a potential sale and we don’t feel like we’ve given the player away cheap... it’s down to the player to make it happen after the move..

Brooks to Man Utd, hope so, we still need more money, it was a great deal for the club cause we weren’t getting anything off the owners any time soon..

I’m changing my tune a little, but I still want owners who want to keep the best prospects from the accademy, maybe pay the right wages to keep them as well once they start to shine..
 
Could be wors wiv Sharpe Clark Golddick Baldrick Bashum Wildre knille Egun freemun Flick knorwood etc etc :p

With only 155 posts you obviously don't realise how touchy I am about my dylexer! Answer me this do you point at people with one arm, the blind, dwarfs etc and laugh? It's a disability
 
With only 155 posts you obviously don't realise how touchy I am about my dylexer! Answer me this do you point at people with one arm, the blind, dwarfs etc and laugh? It's a disability
No because I have no fingers :D Btw not all disabilities are visual :)
 
I'm pullin yer plonker ;).

PS can I have your fingerless gloves?
You quote my tongue in cheek post for poking fun at disabilities ( which wasn't intended) and then proceed to say your doing something I cannot ( pulling plonkers ) as I have no fingers and then have the cheek to ask for my fingerless gloves !! :mad::mad:
 
You quote my tongue in cheek post for poking fun at disabilities ( which wasn't intended) and then proceed to say your doing something I cannot ( pulling plonkers ) as I have no fingers and then have the cheek to ask for my fingerless gloves !! :mad::mad:
'Ang on, how are you typing?
 
With only 155 posts you obviously don't realise how touchy I am

about my dylexer!



Answer me this do you point at people with one arm, the blind, dwarfs etc and laugh? It's a disability


You know what the term was in our day don't you?
 

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom