LouTheBlade
Active Member
So far we have seen the following come in;
Steve Simonsen - Free
Johannes Ertl - Free
Simon Walton - Loan
Leon Britton - Free
Daniel Bogdanovic - Free
We have also see the following go out;
Paddy Kenny - 750K
Ian Bennett - Free
Gary Naysmith - Free
Jordan Stewart - Free
Billy Sharp - 1.15M (initial 900K)
In terms of quality, we can arguably say we have brought in better than what we've let go, so from that point of view I'm relatively happy. Its no secret that we will see a few more coming in over the next couple of weeks but the fees noted above got me thinking.
In total we have received £1.65M in transfer fees (based on reports), which will rise to £1.9M if you take Billy Sharp's full quoted figure (not sure what the extra is based on). My question would be; is the Paddy / Billy money going to be used for new signings. Knowing United probably not and as we are only quoted as making an actual transfer bid for Nosworthy, it suggests the rest will probably be freebies.
We can obviously assume that the players we have signed will have received signing on fees etc. so money will have been spent there, but I just wonder how much of the money we have received will actually be reinvested into the team???? Personally, I dont care whether United bring in a load of free transfers or not, as long as they're good ones. But we're obviously trimming the wage budget so are keeping our transfer spending right down as well????
Thoughts anyone????
Steve Simonsen - Free
Johannes Ertl - Free
Simon Walton - Loan
Leon Britton - Free
Daniel Bogdanovic - Free
We have also see the following go out;
Paddy Kenny - 750K
Ian Bennett - Free
Gary Naysmith - Free
Jordan Stewart - Free
Billy Sharp - 1.15M (initial 900K)
In terms of quality, we can arguably say we have brought in better than what we've let go, so from that point of view I'm relatively happy. Its no secret that we will see a few more coming in over the next couple of weeks but the fees noted above got me thinking.
In total we have received £1.65M in transfer fees (based on reports), which will rise to £1.9M if you take Billy Sharp's full quoted figure (not sure what the extra is based on). My question would be; is the Paddy / Billy money going to be used for new signings. Knowing United probably not and as we are only quoted as making an actual transfer bid for Nosworthy, it suggests the rest will probably be freebies.
We can obviously assume that the players we have signed will have received signing on fees etc. so money will have been spent there, but I just wonder how much of the money we have received will actually be reinvested into the team???? Personally, I dont care whether United bring in a load of free transfers or not, as long as they're good ones. But we're obviously trimming the wage budget so are keeping our transfer spending right down as well????
Thoughts anyone????