Blades 2 Colchester 3 - moan/monologue

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Deadbat

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2009
Messages
6,547
Reaction score
38,682
....Sorry too tired, its late, I simply cant be arsed to do my usual match report/summary.

I have an early start for work tomorrow and quite simply after watching that shambles I do not have the time nor inclination to pen more than a few paragraphs. It will more of a rant as I go to full Alan Bennett mode

Sadly this was worse than a cream cracker under the settee.

In short, it was as bad if not worse than anything under Weir, Wilson, Clough. We looked a disorganised mess.

I await those who come on and say but we could have scored 5 or 6 goals...maybe more. Yes you are right. Sharp missed a penalty. He missed two sitters and McNulty could have scored. We had a few other near misses. All of those were after we could have been 5--0 down. 5-0 down to Colchester and it would have been a fair reflection. An awful side at the bottom of the league and they tore us apart...in fact they did not even have to.

Teams have scouted us now and the secret is out. Press us high up, harry us and watch the Blades give it away. It happened on Saturday and happened tonight. All that crap about we have to be patient and teams will defend versus us; is garbage. Bury and Colchester have had a go and scored goals and could have had more.

Our slow ponderous side was picked off time after time and they ghosted through. Baxter at fault for the first, second not sure, but another giveaway. It happened 3 or 4 more times. A lot will point to the centre of the defence and other areas but iin truth the biggest weakness tonight was our awful central midfield. Those two were embarrassing. They were walked past, out fought, out run and generally out played. Soares and Mellis did the same Saturday. Those two are not good enough but they are the best we have. Slow, unathletic, lacking creativity, bite or steel. We are soft as shit in the middle and easy to play against. Sorry all those who laud Basham, the guy is not good enough. Slow and pathetically weak for a big man. With him and Sammon we seem to have the weakest, neshest 6 foot 2 players I have seen since Tony Philliskirk. Baxter was as bad with his stupid overplaying and daft sideways balls intercepted. I would have Doyle back tomorrow in some ways. At least he gave us bite.

I can cope with crap football and lack of idea (plenty of that tonight as they all passed the buck as they treated the ball like a hot potato and could not wait till play it back or got rid) but the total absolution of responsibility was appalling. Noone cared about taking initiative. This coupled with the lack of passion and effort much of the game added up to a mixture of dreadful play individually and collectively.

I thought Adkins would come ina nd give us some organisation, some steel and some shape. Tonight we looked like a kids side, running all over, no one in positions, no one keeping discipline. All the bollocks will come out to say we were chasing the game so had to take risks is garbage. We were all over the place at 0-0, 0-1, 0-2. If they had been more clinical it would have been over long before Sharp missed those two.

We had a go for 15 mins and got level. Interesting for all this talk over Adkins will get us playing properly etc and passing football, away from Dinosaur Dave and Warnock; our best spell came when we played balls behind the defence (long balls) that got the defenders turnings. Sharp and McNulty chasing stuff and Campbell Ryce down the win onto long balls was out best tactic. That may depress some but compare that with the nonsensical passing out from the back when they tried to play it around stupidly and it nearly led to more goals being conceded. the players are not good enough to play this stuff. I admire Adkins to wanting to play the right way but this will not work with these players. Like under Weir they will make mistakes and lead to chances.

Players - No ratings

Played well - Campbell Ryce - Got a few crosses in, continued to try and go forward and our main threat. Yes he is frustrating but without him where was our threat? He was the only one who looked bothered for much of the game.

Decent -

McEveley -yes I cant stand the guy and he had a bad 15 mins at the start overplaying but you know what he tried tonight and actually did not hide. He won the pen and I felt gave a damn. Many will automatically criticise him but today he was not the worst.

McNulty - Made a difference for a while and nearly scored a wonder goal. After this did not quite have same impact but helped change game just by looking interested.

Freeman - Made a few mistakes but again maybe our best defender and at least stuck at it and tried to pass it forward.

Howard - Tempted to put him in poor but he made 2 or 3 good saves (ones you would expect) and had little chance on the goals. Put us in some awful situations with his kick out, stupid short passes and then 2 shots hit the bar he knew nothing about. He is a weak link for me but there are about 8 or 9 others too in the side.

Poor -

Sharp - Stupid to put 3 pens in same spot and he missed 2 sitters. He did try hard and for a 15 minute spell looked lively.

Woolford - A few decent runs and the goal (well finished apart) not sure he did much of note.

Collins and Edgar - Got caught too many times ball watching and both made mistakes but to be fair had no protection in front despite slowness of speed defending and inability to sense danger.


Awful -

Sammon - Did well first game I saw, since then he has been awful. No control, no goal threat (apart from missing sitters) and no physical presence. He looks no more the answer than Higdon (being serious). So poor in the air and looks like bambi on ice.

Basham / Baxter - Both awful. Did not get close to the opponents all night, slow and sluggish. Poor on the ball and no protection to the defence. It was like we did not have a midfield much of the night.

Colchester were no great shakes but they had some pace, runners from midfield (what are they?!) and attacked. They had loads of shots and really could have had a lot more. Other than that 20 minutes spell where we got back in it, they had more shots, more of the play and looked better than us. They deserved the win and if it had finished 7-4 it would have been about right. The fact the 2nd bottom side as they were can play us off the park s a worry. Defeats to Bury and Colchester, sides that will be nowhere near the top tossing us outside means Adkins now has some stark choices to make.

People may see it is a blip, and it is early doors but this is 3 seasons with many of the same players and basis still contriving to be mostly hopeless. We cant keep changing the managers. In reality a mass clear out should have happened in the summer. Pay players off, do whatever we needed to change the culture, the ethos of the side. Get hungry, fast and athletic players with bite and will to win. Get winners. We did not do that. Adkins chose to wait, To look at what we have. Sadly this may mean we have lost another season. I do not see anywhere close to a promotion side here. There is too many fundamental weaknesses.


I thought Adkins may have got the shape and discipline and some basics in order but the fact he has struggled maybe is as much down the fact these players do not 'get it' and many of the will never 'will get it.' We have players in reserve than for the most part are as bad or even worse. Sure Done, Brayford may come back but for the most par they are not good enough. He needs leaders, a spine and some experience that can come in and shake up this comfortable plod along mentality many have. We cannot wait till the end of the season to bin many of them.

Sadly the best thing I can say is that there is no home game for nearly two weeks. The last two games have been a massive disappointment; not just the results but the manner of the performances. Players that still in the main (save for a few bursts when we are already losing and chasing games) look totally unlikely to get us anywhere neat a top two finish.

Rant over.
 



Just bumping this....cheers Deadbat.
 
have to disagree with some of this
campbell ryce was bloody awful. gets in position and goes round again.. and again. just cross the fucking thing.. show pony. no end product
at least basham tried hard and came out with the ball a few times. he looked 'bothered'. it can't be easy playing with baxter.useless c*nt
 
I thought Campbell-Ryce was good, yes, sometimes he takes too long to get a cross in, and when he does it's often poor anyway, but at least he offers a genuine threat, as well as some bloody initiative. And the fact that he lasted as long as he did makes a mockery of his substitution on Saturday.

Sharp is a weird one, he made one and scored one but was generally very poor. Early on, Baxter rolled it into his feet on the half way line and the ball bounced off him. Touch of a brick wall.
 
I thought Campbell-Ryce was good, yes, sometimes he takes too long to get a cross in, and when he does it's often poor anyway, but at least he offers a genuine threat, as well as some bloody initiative. And the fact that he lasted as long as he did makes a mockery of his substitution on Saturday.

Sharp is a weird one, he made one and scored one but was generally very poor. Early on, Baxter rolled it into his feet on the half way line and the ball bounced off him. Touch of a brick wall.
agree about the substitution. i suppose if he could cross the ball he wouldn't be here
 
Can't disagree there. . . Did they hit the bar twice? I'm either blocking that out or didn't notice.

It really could have been a once in a generation goal fest for them. There was a brilliant break at the kop end that showed all the traits that we lack that I would have applauded had they scored. Pace, running, composure and went from tackling our wide man to having a shot in the blink of an eye. They looked to have a couple of decent free kick threats too.

we can't play two in the middle if one of them doesn't make a tackle or an interception all night.
 
agree about the substitution. i suppose if he could cross the ball he wouldn't be here

It can't help that when he does put in a great cross one of the mugs in the middle makes a hash of it!

I can completely understand why someone wouldn't rate him, between the time it takes him to get a cross in and the poor quality of most of them, but he can beat players for fun and he always has a go.
 
Can't disagree there. . . Did they hit the bar twice? I'm either blocking that out or didn't notice.

It really could have been a once in a generation goal fest for them. There was a brilliant break at the kop end that showed all the traits that we lack that I would have applauded had they scored. Pace, running, composure and went from tackling our wide man to having a shot in the blink of an eye. They looked to have a couple of decent free kick threats too.

we can't play two in the middle if one of them doesn't make a tackle or an interception all night.

Well they had one hit the stanchion at the back of the goal at the Kop end, that one possibly took a nick off the bar. It bent viciously in front of Howard, he may even have got a touch on it.
 
It can't help that when he does put in a great cross one of the mugs in the middle makes a hash of it!

I can completely understand why someone wouldn't rate him, between the time it takes him to get a cross in and the poor quality of most of them, but he can beat players for fun and he always has a go.
yeah he beats the players.. but then has to have another go! drives me crazy
 
I thought Campbell-Ryce was good, yes, sometimes he takes too long to get a cross in, and when he does it's often poor anyway, but at least he offers a genuine threat, as well as some bloody initiative. And the fact that he lasted as long as he did makes a mockery of his substitution on Saturday.

Sharp is a weird one, he made one and scored one but was generally very poor. Early on, Baxter rolled it into his feet on the half way line and the ball bounced off him. Touch of a brick wall.
Someone said on another thread that often he's cutting back because a cross would be blocked so he tries again. I suppose it's all about where you sit in terms of recognising whether that is true. I shudder to think what we'd have been like without him tonight. He put a couple of great balls in that no-one reacted correctly to, one in particular at the kop end that was begging for someone to run on to that went accross the six yard line at an angle from the corner from the box. McNulty and Sharp were both in the box but didn't anticipate it to make the run.
 
have to disagree with some of this
campbell ryce was bloody awful. gets in position and goes round again.. and again. just cross the fucking thing.. show pony. no end product
at least basham tried hard and came out with the ball a few times. he looked 'bothered'. it can't be easy playing with baxter.useless c*nt

Afraid your summing up of Baxter fits Basham too Super Pig. JCR your right, to much fannying about before trying to cross it but he remains one of our few threats. Sparky did more in his first 5 mins than the Fish had done all match prior to being subbed. I've been patient with Higdon, but tonight it was like we had brought someones granddad on.
 
Well they had one hit the stanchion at the back of the goal at the Kop end, that one possibly took a nick off the bar. It bent viciously in front of Howard, he may even have got a touch on it.
Ah yes. I thought he tipped it over. It didn't half move. A couple around me were groaning at Howard for that!
 
Their second goal looked offside at the time AND on the Sky highlights.

Sharp was outside the box when fouled for his third penalty attempt.

Did anyone who sits on the side think so too?
 
I reckon the deal with JCR is that his first attempt at a cross (in his opinion) would get blocked, so he switches to his left (which he can't cross with).... hence the switch back onto his right foot for the "3rd" attempt, by which time the opposition have all defensive options back, and our attack are completely confused :D
 



Disagree about your comment that Bury and Colchester have both come at us.

Only Chestefield and Colchester have come at us at the Lane this season.
Chestefield bossed the game but were poor in attack sending in high balls which we easily dealt with.
Colchester very open and quite naive but they counter attacking was the best we've seen this season.

Blackpool and Bury were both tactical and negative.
Bury only cane in our half about 5 times on Saturday and only beat us due to a little luck and having high quality (for this league) strikers.

I felt we were robbed on Saturday as we were the better team
But tonight Colchester had us on the ropes in that first half and I was pleased we were only 2-0 down.
Their defence was a bit dodgy and it could have ended up 5-5.
We created many more chances than them tonight but most of ours were half chances
Whereas their their chances were full clear cut chances. So I'm giving credit to CU.

I suppose it's the common argument.
Was it them that played so well or us that played so badly?
 
have to disagree with some of this
campbell ryce was bloody awful. gets in position and goes round again.. and again. just cross the fucking thing.. show pony. no end product
at least basham tried hard and came out with the ball a few times. he looked 'bothered'. it can't be easy playing with baxter.useless c*nt
JCR might not be the best player but he's the only one that looks like any threat to the opposition defence. Granted it's extremely frustrating that he tries to beat his man 2 or 3 times, and he often can't cross a ball, but on the odd occasion he does get a decent ball into the box, there's no-one there to capitalise on it.
 
....Sorry too tired, its late, I simply cant be arsed to do my usual match report/summary.

I have an early start for work tomorrow and quite simply after watching that shambles I do not have the time nor inclination to pen more than a few paragraphs. It will more of a rant as I go to full Alan Bennett mode

Sadly this was worse than a cream cracker under the settee.

In short, it was as bad if not worse than anything under Weir, Wilson, Clough. We looked a disorganised mess.

I await those who come on and say but we could have scored 5 or 6 goals...maybe more. Yes you are right. Sharp missed a penalty. He missed two sitters and McNulty could have scored. We had a few other near misses. All of those were after we could have been 5--0 down. 5-0 down to Colchester and it would have been a fair reflection. An awful side at the bottom of the league and they tore us apart...in fact they did not even have to.

Teams have scouted us now and the secret is out. Press us high up, harry us and watch the Blades give it away. It happened on Saturday and happened tonight. All that crap about we have to be patient and teams will defend versus us; is garbage. Bury and Colchester have had a go and scored goals and could have had more.

Our slow ponderous side was picked off time after time and they ghosted through. Baxter at fault for the first, second not sure, but another giveaway. It happened 3 or 4 more times. A lot will point to the centre of the defence and other areas but iin truth the biggest weakness tonight was our awful central midfield. Those two were embarrassing. They were walked past, out fought, out run and generally out played. Soares and Mellis did the same Saturday. Those two are not good enough but they are the best we have. Slow, unathletic, lacking creativity, bite or steel. We are soft as shit in the middle and easy to play against. Sorry all those who laud Basham, the guy is not good enough. Slow and pathetically weak for a big man. With him and Sammon we seem to have the weakest, neshest 6 foot 2 players I have seen since Tony Philliskirk. Baxter was as bad with his stupid overplaying and daft sideways balls intercepted. I would have Doyle back tomorrow in some ways. At least he gave us bite.

I can cope with crap football and lack of idea (plenty of that tonight as they all passed the buck as they treated the ball like a hot potato and could not wait till play it back or got rid) but the total absolution of responsibility was appalling. Noone cared about taking initiative. This coupled with the lack of passion and effort much of the game added up to a mixture of dreadful play individually and collectively.

I thought Adkins would come ina nd give us some organisation, some steel and some shape. Tonight we looked like a kids side, running all over, no one in positions, no one keeping discipline. All the bollocks will come out to say we were chasing the game so had to take risks is garbage. We were all over the place at 0-0, 0-1, 0-2. If they had been more clinical it would have been over long before Sharp missed those two.

We had a go for 15 mins and got level. Interesting for all this talk over Adkins will get us playing properly etc and passing football, away from Dinosaur Dave and Warnock; our best spell came when we played balls behind the defence (long balls) that got the defenders turnings. Sharp and McNulty chasing stuff and Campbell Ryce down the win onto long balls was out best tactic. That may depress some but compare that with the nonsensical passing out from the back when they tried to play it around stupidly and it nearly led to more goals being conceded. the players are not good enough to play this stuff. I admire Adkins to wanting to play the right way but this will not work with these players. Like under Weir they will make mistakes and lead to chances.

Players - No ratings

Played well - Campbell Ryce - Got a few crosses in, continued to try and go forward and our main threat. Yes he is frustrating but without him where was our threat? He was the only one who looked bothered for much of the game.

Decent -

McEveley -yes I cant stand the guy and he had a bad 15 mins at the start overplaying but you know what he tried tonight and actually did not hide. He won the pen and I felt gave a damn. Many will automatically criticise him but today he was not the worst.

McNulty - Made a difference for a while and nearly scored a wonder goal. After this did not quite have same impact but helped change game just by looking interested.

Freeman - Made a few mistakes but again maybe our best defender and at least stuck at it and tried to pass it forward.

Howard - Tempted to put him in poor but he made 2 or 3 good saves (ones you would expect) and had little chance on the goals. Put us in some awful situations with his kick out, stupid short passes and then 2 shots hit the bar he knew nothing about. He is a weak link for me but there are about 8 or 9 others too in the side.

Poor -

Sharp - Stupid to put 3 pens in same spot and he missed 2 sitters. He did try hard and for a 15 minute spell looked lively.

Woolford - A few decent runs and the goal (well finished apart) not sure he did much of note.

Collins and Edgar - Got caught too many times ball watching and both made mistakes but to be fair had no protection in front despite slowness of speed defending and inability to sense danger.


Awful -

Sammon - Did well first game I saw, since then he has been awful. No control, no goal threat (apart from missing sitters) and no physical presence. He looks no more the answer than Higdon (being serious). So poor in the air and looks like bambi on ice.

Basham / Baxter - Both awful. Did not get close to the opponents all night, slow and sluggish. Poor on the ball and no protection to the defence. It was like we did not have a midfield much of the night.

Colchester were no great shakes but they had some pace, runners from midfield (what are they?!) and attacked. They had loads of shots and really could have had a lot more. Other than that 20 minutes spell where we got back in it, they had more shots, more of the play and looked better than us. They deserved the win and if it had finished 7-4 it would have been about right. The fact the 2nd bottom side as they were can play us off the park s a worry. Defeats to Bury and Colchester, sides that will be nowhere near the top tossing us outside means Adkins now has some stark choices to make.

People may see it is a blip, and it is early doors but this is 3 seasons with many of the same players and basis still contriving to be mostly hopeless. We cant keep changing the managers. In reality a mass clear out should have happened in the summer. Pay players off, do whatever we needed to change the culture, the ethos of the side. Get hungry, fast and athletic players with bite and will to win. Get winners. We did not do that. Adkins chose to wait, To look at what we have. Sadly this may mean we have lost another season. I do not see anywhere close to a promotion side here. There is too many fundamental weaknesses.


I thought Adkins may have got the shape and discipline and some basics in order but the fact he has struggled maybe is as much down the fact these players do not 'get it' and many of the will never 'will get it.' We have players in reserve than for the most part are as bad or even worse. Sure Done, Brayford may come back but for the most par they are not good enough. He needs leaders, a spine and some experience that can come in and shake up this comfortable plod along mentality many have. We cannot wait till the end of the season to bin many of them.

Sadly the best thing I can say is that there is no home game for nearly two weeks. The last two games have been a massive disappointment; not just the results but the manner of the performances. Players that still in the main (save for a few bursts when we are already losing and chasing games) look totally unlikely to get us anywhere neat a top two finish.

Rant over.

Spot on.
 
7 league games into the season and we are 5th.

Manager has been here just over 3 months.

We are without our 2 best players Brayford and Done plus other key players Harris, Kennedy, J. Wallace and have been all season to date. Four of them will be back by October all being well.

We know we are in the market for new players but 93 day loans take us only to 18th December.

Taking the example of Basham, the manager has to have a good long look at a player so highly regarded in midfield by the fans etc.. It all takes time as does his evaluation of each and every player individually as well as collectively playing with each other. He is learning things all the time.

Keep calm, these are early days. Once the side settles by November we will move onwards and upwards. 5th in the league is no disaster. Adkins will win numerous games we may have drawn in the past and he will also lose a couple we might have drawn. So what?
 
feel sorry for basham.. he was trying to play two positions at once covering for the utterly useless Baxter.
 
Their second goal looked offside at the time AND on the Sky highlights.

Sharp was outside the box when fouled for his third penalty attempt.

Did anyone who sits on the side think so too?
Looks offside on the footage,unless JMac who is out of picture played him on...looks like Bash was with the runner but gave up and he then runs straight past Baxter...Collins to close to Edgar and leaves a gap.
http://www.skysports.com/watch/vide...e-one/9993035/sheffield-united-2-3-colchester
 
Diabolical first half, they looked like eleven people who had won a competition to play football together and this was their first meeting.

Good ten or fifteen minutes spell in the second half to get it back to 2-2 and then they reverted to type.

Deadbat's player summaries are pretty much spot on.
 
Can't disagree with any of that Deadbat.
I think that was the worst first 45 minutes I've seen from a Blades side in 35 years.
 
Sharp or.McNulty score any of numerous good chances and we don't have all this negativity.

There are real issues but I'm not sure many are addressed in the thread.
 



For the first, Baxter just watches as the runner goes past him - he knew he was coming as he looked over his shoulder a second or two before :mad:
For the second, Collins performs a similar routine :mad:

Not fookin good enough. I hope Adkins let's them know the same.
 

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom