Blades 1 Burton 2 - brief report

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Deadbat

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2009
Messages
6,529
Reaction score
38,475




Brief report and ratings:



Overall it was poor game and a poor performance. We started well and knocked it about for the first 20 mins which was fine even if we did not create anything as I felt we were moving them about but sadly it just continued with the defence playing it across, the same for the midfield and then in the last third, totally clueless. We never looked like creating much at all never mind scoring. The keeper made maybe a couple of saves all night and these were weak efforts from Porter. McDonald’s passing was off and the front men were totally ineffective.



Sadly the team selection did not work. He was right to rotate some but Flynn and McFadzean did not convince and the defence were shaky (under very little pressure to be fair) all night. The football was pretty and neat but we were ponderous and as soon as we got to the final third never looked like scoring really. It was very slow and almost too patient. We had no penetration and often it just went side to side, to back, to side and I barely recall us getting wide or getting beyond them. They soaked up the pressure and then had as many chances as us. The goal they scored was a simple cross that Howard spilled and they tapped it. Porter went off and Taylor at least looked a threat before Doyle scored a cracker. I thought we may push on after this and whilst we were the better side we again huffed and puffed rather than really showing any quality. It looked destined for extra time when they broke, the winger got away from Williams and then crosses where the same man, Hussey, headed home unopposed as neither Collins nor Westlake reacted. That was it. Game over. Right on full time.



Overall, United were poor. They passed it around well but at such a slow pace and were utterly clueless in the last third. They missed the running of Brandy and Murphy and Porter was poor again. The midfield did ok but again just passed it sideways or back and no one in the team ran at players or committed people. So many players came back inside or played safe but we just went nowhere. Sadly it looked like some of poorer displays under Wilson last year when at times we did the same; kept the ball but teams just sat back and allowed us to knock it about knowing we lacked pace/genuine quality to create.



As bad as we were in the last third it is worrying that the defence were so poor when facing little in the Burton attack but whenever they attacked they properly looked like scoring. The full backs were not good enough defensively and when the ball came into the box the keeper and centre backs did not command. They had maybe 4 or 5 attacks all night and nearly scored from all of them.



It was worrying that a League Two side dealt with us so easily and just sat deep and waited for the inevitable error and then came away with it. We were good Friday but tonight was really disappointing and it seemed Burton had looked at our formation and worked out without Brandy that they could see us off quite comfortably and so it proved. Better teams than Burton will play the same way, crowding the midfield and just waiting to pick us off then it moves into the final third (if it ever does – often it never did tonight).



Howard 5/10 – Badly at fault for the first goal where he came for a cross that was gettable and failed to catch or get a proper punch and sort of flapped at it. The ball fell to their man who knocked it into the empty net. He had little chance on the second although the header again came from right on the 6 yard box but would be tough to blame him as the cross came back. Had little else to do but sadly fluffed it when it mattered and Long will remain as the undoubted number one.



Westlake 5.5/10 – I d some felt he did ok going forward and had some good runs and one effort on goal but his defending was really poor. At times he was too slow to react and did not seem to sense danger. He let his man get in a number of times and then seemed to let the man come straight across him to head home unopposed.



Williams 4/10 – Like Westlake felt he played well Friday but tonight he was quite poor and reminded me more of the Williams we remembered sadly. He got forward but often just came back inside and never seemed to want to go at the full back. Defensively he too was not close enough to his man and dallied unnecessarily in possession. Both goals came from crosses down his side. He was sadly back to the player I never felt was good enough.



Maguire 6/10 – Knocked it about across the defence back and forth but he too was clumsy in possession and got caught in possession a few times. He at least tried to take some responsibility but I felt he then tried to rush things and was guilty of going either sideways or then way too long



Collins 6/10 – Like Maguire he too was knocking it around but often sideways and backward and they just sat off and allowed them to play it across the defence where we could not hurt them. On the first goal he lost a key header in the build up and a few other occasions he lost his man when often he only had one to play against.



Doyle 7/10 – One of our better players if not our most effective. He won the ball and moved it on. There was nothing remarkable about his play but he did at least have a few efforts on goal and scored an absolute scorcher from lost distance that bent and curved past the keeper. He was one of few that actually came away with some credit.



Coady 6.5/10 – Started well and used it and always tried to get on the ball. He never stops moving and is comfortable in possession. He looked energetic and full of running in the first half but then faded quite badly and I barely remember him second half. He tried to move it forwards but often it was too predictable. I expected to see a better range of passing but mostly it was just short stuff and he did not really get in the last third being more withdrawn. Hopefully there is more to come and he can start to become more influential.



Flynn 3/10 – Thought he was pretty dire from start to finish. His first touch was poor, he continually shirked responsibility and never went at his man all night Looked disinterested to me and sadly he will be nowhere near the first team in league action on tonight’s show. Had a chance to put down a marker but showed nothing



McFadzean 5/10 – Thought he started well and showed some decent link up and had a few efforts and crosses on goal. However as United faded then so did he. His touch started to go and he was never really in the game in the second half. Another that did not really show enough to warrant a first team start for forthcoming games.



McDonald 5.5/10 – Player one lovely ball to Porter and had a few other decent moments but often his passing was off and he overplayed too much or tried to play balls that were never on. Worrying that he had one of his poorest games but still looked one of our main threats to unlock the defence.



Porter 3/10 – Another poor performance. People will say he works hard for the team and leads the line but I watched him carefully. He barely held the ball up, did not really link with others (ball flew off him 2 or 3 times) and then missed a simple header off a scramble. He had one decent shot first half and then another second but missed a simple rebound off the second one. Overall he missed 3 or 4 more chances and as our main striker does not look like scoring or creating for others. Sadly we need far better in such a formation if he is seen as the focal point of the attack.



Subs



Taylor – Probably did more in his first 5 minutes on the pitch than Porter in the whole game he was one. Had a few shots from range and then a decent effort after a turn and run. He looked lively but went through the wars a bit as he was down injured twice. Had a few appeals for penalties but I did not think they were.



Brady – Hard for him to get in the game as it was so poor/scrappy. He showed a few tricks but often he got crowded out as we struggled to create much.

 



Porter and Flynn = dogshit

Quelle surprise! Whether people like it or not, they epitomise a team we should be shaking off if we want to be considered as a challenge for promotion, if not the title. Argue all you want - and many will say (when Porter scores one of his five this season) 'told you so' but everything after Cresswell's own goal at BDTBL has been cunt-soup since. And those two clowns are a prime example of it.

pommpey
 
Go along with that Deadbat . Not enough shooting and crossing ,Coady being the main culprit ,we get in some good positions and than decide to pass ,apart from Taylor who is the total opposite. We need to make better decisions , gamble and be more clinical. But this is very early in the new regime and it will take time. We must show patience and not get on the players back while they are still experimenting and getting to grips with the massive change in strategy.
 
Sitters - let me know when it is okay to get on the players backs, will you mate? Seems to me they have an utter bag of arseholes season (like last season, for example - but paid a handsome salary, compared to the Lane faithful) have eight weeks off and a holiday and then pre-season and we should be still cutting them some slack when they continue to put in the performances we chewed our knuckles about last season.

We were beaten tonight (once again) in the cup by a lower league side once considered a fag paper above Meersbrook Athletic. Had we gone out to Middlesborough or Blackburn Rovers, I'd be a bit more reflective.

pommpey
 
Across the two games so far, I'm unconvinced that we have enough goals in this team. The way we play, when we play badly we probably won't threaten much at all and when we play well we won't always score enough. We outplayed County on Saturday but only won by one and tonight we barely looked like scoring, barring an excellent goal from distance, with the defence sleeping.

The main problem tonight it seemed to me is that the two nominal wingers, Flynn and McFadzean, drifted inside and got lost in the middle. Time after time Westlake and especially Williams got the ball in plenty of space out wide but had nothing in front of them, meaning they had to a) play it backwards or sideways, b) cross from far too deep or c) take on a man which they lack the capacity to do, really. It also made the middle of the park too crowded which probably contributed to McDonald being far less effective tonight.
 
I've always said, we are a better side playing the midfield passing game and getting the ball out to the flanks. It's the way most good teams play and if played correctly, is a tough game to break. We did it a few times under Warnock, particularly with Nuddy and Tongy switching wings and being fed by Brown and Macca or whoever was in the middle of the park. Of course, back then we had a decent batch of strikers; nothing remarkable - just people willing to get in front of the defenders or create half a yard.

On Friday, we had 75% of that. We just need the clinical finisher.

pommpey
 
One game then it is. How helpful ,get Blackwell back.


Nope. And that's where you fall into the trap. I think Weir is good, and I think we have the framework of a decent footballing side now, albeit no strength in depth. There are some who still have the potential to go backwards - Williams and Murphy seemed to be playing the same game last Friday that they had done last season, but talismanic people like McD, Brandy and even (heaven forfend) Doyle were showing signs of improvement and enjoying the new style.

I don't want Blackwell, Wilson or even Warnock back. I want a new, improved Sheffield United, silverware more than once in my lifetime and to be able to play those bastards from S6 next season. And beat them comfortably.

pommpey
 
When we got promoted too, we had Ifill (yes, he played a big part folks!) and Gillespie, plus Tonge again of course. Up front we had no-one outstanding but a few strikers who all got to double figures or their abouts - Webber, Kabba, Shipperley. Again, nothing remarkable but it saw us over the line! I'm not sure that the squad as it currently stands has enough to put teams away regularly.
 
Just swap strikers with Burton they had few chances, little possession and still managed to score twice.
 
Agree with most of what you've said DB. I perhaps wouldn't rate Flynn so low, he put in the effort but I was disappointed he didn't beat his man when given the opportunity. It was clear to see we missed Brandy and Murphy, Brandy never really had time to get into the game and was doubled up on at most opportunities.

We met up with some Burton supporting friends before and after the game, they were very impressed with McFadzean, they also asked me to thank the club for playing Williams as they believe he deserves full credit for their win.

After Friday I thought we'd walk this lot, but I was encouraged by Taylor, at least we gained some attacking threat when he came on. First 15 minutes we played fantastically well and I thought we would get a hat full.
 
Desperately lacking quality up front, Taylor has to start on Saturday, just how many chances is the totally ineffective Porter going to get?

Our striking options seem very limited at the moment, I would suggest we need another one in before the window closes. Take the lad who scored twice last night!!
 
Have to say, as much as I have defended Porter for the work he does off the ball, if he can't put it in the net against Burton then you have to ask questions. But you have to ask the same questions of every other forward who plays for us. We aren't scoring. Put that right and its not an issue.
 
Looking at the team selection, it's clear to me that Weir expected performances from certain players after selecting his first XI on Friday while hoping that another 90 mins game-time would help the defence settle.

Howard, Flynn and McFadzean all seem to have failed to impress and while I was surprised to see Porter starting I would have thought that it was in response to a fairly poor striking performance on Friday. I would have thought we will start against Brentford with the same line up as Notts County but if Porter continues to not impress, Taylor will come on earlier.

All-in-all it's never good to lose at home to lower league opposition but I can see that we could take quite a lot out of last night. I'd be amazed if there's not movement in the transfer market before the end of August to add some depth while removing some of the dead wood.
 



Williams 4/10 – Like Westlake felt he played well Friday but tonight he was quite poor and reminded me more of the Williams we remembered sadly. He got forward but often just came back inside and never seemed to want to go at the full back. Defensively he too was not close enough to his man and dallied unnecessarily in possession. Both goals came from crosses down his side. He was sadly back to the player I never felt was good enough.
This was down to his team mates as much as Williams, every time they finally gave him the ball he had 3 opposition player to run at, almost every single time. Due to a lack of support or movement in the right areas if he'd have gone at the full back, which people were screaming at him, he'd have had to have taken on two midfielders first and then beaten the full back to cross to Porter who was alone.

It was often similar with Westlake (though less often) as by the time Maguire had finally decided to give him the ball (after Westlake calling for it for about the 8th time) he was closed down fairly tightly and had to come inwards.

They did both get caught out defensively a couple of times though.


Maguire 6/10 – Knocked it about across the defence back and forth but he too was clumsy in possession and got caught in possession a few times. He at least tried to take some responsibility but I felt he then tried to rush things and was guilty of going either sideways or then way too long
Very kind to Maguire who for the most part had a bit of a shocker. Clumsy and ponderous in possession and the moment near the end of the game when he chose to flick the ball over the striker in the area only to look up to see the other one he'd just passed to was inexcusable for a centre back.


Flynn 3/10 – Thought he was pretty dire from start to finish. His first touch was poor, he continually shirked responsibility and never went at his man all night Looked disinterested to me and sadly he will be nowhere near the first team in league action on tonight’s show. Had a chance to put down a marker but showed nothing
He clearly doesn't look as fit as the rest of them, having missed the pre-season tour, but I thought it was a bit of a mistake to try and play him in the Brandy role, he simply doesn't have the explosive pace that helps Brandy.


McDonald 5.5/10 – Player one lovely ball to Porter and had a few other decent moments but often his passing was off and he overplayed too much or tried to play balls that were never on. Worrying that he had one of his poorest games but still looked one of our main threats to unlock the defence.
Got deeper and deeper as the game went on in an effort to get on the ball, as you say, his passing was off at times and there was one point during the second half when he played a ball straight out of play only for those around us to lay into Williams, who apparently should have magically been the 20 yards further forward where the pass went out of play. He wasn't as effective playing from deep and Burton defending fairly resolutely didn't help his game.


Porter 3/10 – Another poor performance. People will say he works hard for the team and leads the line but I watched him carefully. He barely held the ball up, did not really link with others (ball flew off him 2 or 3 times) and then missed a simple header off a scramble. He had one decent shot first half and then another second but missed a simple rebound off the second one. Overall he missed 3 or 4 more chances and as our main striker does not look like scoring or creating for others. Sadly we need far better in such a formation if he is seen as the focal point of the attack.
I think whoever had played up top last night would have looked poor. He was hardly given the ball and had little or no support. Contrast to Saturday, when half decent balls to him were chested/knocked down for Brandy/Murphy, we went back to having no one within 40 yards of him a lot of the time. A couple of decent saves to his efforts meant he came closest to scoring other than Doyle's goal, but he should have probably done better with at least one of them. I disagree with needing far better in the formation, whoever we played would need support and the creation of more and better chances.




Taylor Probably did more in his first 5 minutes on the pitch than Porter in the whole game he was one. Had a few shots from range and then a decent effort after a turn and run. He looked lively but went through the wars a bit as he was down injured twice. Had a few appeals for penalties but I did not think they were.
The first 5 minutes, he effectively played as a winger, he pulled out to the right hand side in order to get on the ball and his efforts were from cutting inside from the wing, rather than playing as a striker. Given they were also off target, I think it's a little harsh to use it as a stick to beat Porter, who actually got a couple on target.
 
I don't care about going out in the cup, however I wish we would just tell the fans we are playing a 2nd 11. I feel like I rehash this every year.

I am more interested in how we play on Saturday and I will leave it to Weir and his staff to pick the pieces on a game I don't give 2 shits about.
 
It seems clear that Murphy and Brandy are 1st choices and he was having a look at McFadzean and Flynn in similar roles. As people have said, Flynn isn't Brandy by any stretch and you do wonder where he's going to fit in as he hasn't really shown what you want from a winger in his time with us.

Overall, it is still early days and whilst we may be overpassing it at times at the moment, they are obviously trying to pass, pass, pass as instructed and you'd expect us to get more clinical as we get more games and the players get used to each other and their strengths etc.

Saturday will be interesting. We've dominated possession in the two games so far but it will be completely different when we should be on the back foot with the likes of Donaldson running at us who's always caused us problems. Whether we'll be able to keep the ball and succeed with this style of play when chasing a game is the big question. What I hope we don't do is become even more defensive away from home and just pass the ball in our own half a la Donny in the season SOD got the push.
 
Nope. And that's where you fall into the trap. I think Weir is good, and I think we have the framework of a decent footballing side now, albeit no strength in depth. There are some who still have the potential to go backwards - Williams and Murphy seemed to be playing the same game last Friday that they had done last season, but talismanic people like McD, Brandy and even (heaven forfend) Doyle were showing signs of improvement and enjoying the new style.

I don't want Blackwell, Wilson or even Warnock back. I want a new, improved Sheffield United, silverware more than once in my lifetime and to be able to play those bastards from S6 next season. And beat them comfortably.

pommpey
Hey don't we all Pommps! But for the life of me I can't get your savage attacks on individuals, save it relieving your frustrations (that we all feel), I can't see what good it does mate?
Its patently obvious that some are not up to it even at this level and I know that as much as you or anyone else who watches, but I couldn't do their job any better myself (actually a whole lot worse!), so I'm reticent to slag off people who are better than me at what they do.
My job is to give support, not criticise, and that's what I try to do to the best of my ability.
I know..... you've got you're way and I've got mine, that's what makes us human beings..... just needed to say it like...

Oh, by the way, I went, we were shite, that's football, up one minute, down t'next.... Lets hope Brentford answers the next questions posed about the teams true level positively..
 
I just wish we'd turn up for these games once in a while. Can't for the life of me understand why we treat this comp with weapons grade meh. Win, get Liverpool next round 25000 gate, 250k in receipts - there you go David, free war chest for January. I know the odds are more likely it'll be someone else rubbish away, but I know for a FACT there's now a 0% chance of it happening.
 
I just wish we'd turn up for these games once in a while. Can't for the life of me understand why we treat this comp with weapons grade meh. Win, get Liverpool next round 25000 gate, 250k in receipts - there you go David, free war chest for January. I know the odds are more likely it'll be someone else rubbish away, but I know for a FACT there's now a 0% chance of it happening.

I couldn't agree more with you on that. I was completely fed up last night of reading united fans' comments on twitter/facebook pages saying they're glad we lost! the cup is a distraction etc, how could it possibly be a distraction so early in the season? wasn't a distraction to Bradford last season, in fact it was probably their cup reason that re-ignited their season and ended up with them getting promotion. We should be aiming to win every game in every comp, as this can only build some positive momentum.
 
I just wish we'd turn up for these games once in a while. Can't for the life of me understand why we treat this comp with weapons grade meh. Win, get Liverpool next round 25000 gate, 250k in receipts - there you go David, free war chest for January. I know the odds are more likely it'll be someone else rubbish away, but I know for a FACT there's now a 0% chance of it happening.


I agree Raul. A trip away to a premiership club or even a big championship club is long overdue for loyal supporters.

It is like we have been surviving on a diet of bread and cheese for two/three years now. These competitions provide a chance to have a bit of chicken for a change.

Back to the cheese again at Brentford.

HH
 
Yep, always amazes me that people don't see the benefits (financial, confidence, just plain winning) that a cup run brings.
Having a wank because we get dumped out of one third of the proper competitions we enter by mid August will never fail to astound me.
 
I agree Raul. A trip away to a premiership club or even a big championship club is long overdue for loyal supporters.

It is like we have been surviving on a diet of bread and cheese for two/three years now. These competitions provide a chance to have a bit of chicken for a change.

Back to the cheese again at Brentford.

HH


We went to Reading last season. Well, the history books say that we did but I don't recall us turning up.
 
The Porter love-in slowly evaporating?
Well bugger me, what a surprise.

...and it's Porter...through on goal...

:tumbleweed:
 
Have to say, as much as I have defended Porter for the work he does off the ball, if he can't put it in the net against Burton then you have to ask questions. But you have to ask the same questions of every other forward who plays for us. We aren't scoring. Put that right and its not an issue.

Porter is falling into that nice lad but lets not use him as scapegoat sort of player. In other words lets try and mask the fact he is playing shit.
 
I agree Raul. A trip away to a premiership club or even a big championship club is long overdue for loyal supporters.

It is like we have been surviving on a diet of bread and cheese for two/three years now. These competitions provide a chance to have a bit of chicken for a change.

Back to the cheese again at Brentford.

Totally disagree. Loyal supporters deserve an away tie at Accrington Stanley, Newport County or Dagenham and Redbridge so I can get a new ground in :)
 



Porter is falling into that nice lad but lets not use him as scapegoat sort of player. In other words lets try and mask the fact he is playing shit.


Or perhaps, if we're tarring anyone missing chances with the shit brush, we ought to use it more freely given he's been far from the only on?
 

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom