Best team line up with Leonard in midfield

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

I said Leonard was a better player than him. Which part of that did you find confusing?

Incidentally how many times have to seen Leonard play? Personally I’ve only seen him in the few games he’s played against us.
 



Incidentally how many times have to seen Leonard play? Personally I’ve only seen him in the few games he’s played against us.

It might surprise you to hear this but I've got eyes which enable me to see and I can also read.
 
Fleck's position isn't under threat at all, we still have no proper replacement for him. If he was unavailable or his form dips significantly, we'd go with Lenny and Lunny and change the dynamic a bit. Unless we did the unthinkable and gave Carruthers a chance there.

Duffy behind one striker isn't a good idea. We'd be lacking at the top of the pitch. He's not one to really get beyond the striker and be a goalscoring threat. It would make us very dependent on the wing backs getting forward well.

Personally I think it would allow 2 of Leonard lundstram and fleck to get forward. Duffy’s style allows for runners from midfield, like lundstram goal against Sunderland
 
Thank fuck for a common sense post. Two points to consider here:

1. Does anyone seriously think that Leonard will be happy to come here just to warm the bench.
2. United's policy is to sign players who are better than we have already got. It's called improving the team. He will start ahead of Lundstram.

I wouldn’t be happy if Leonard walked straight into the team. He needs to fight for his spot
 
I see him as a box to box type and think we might see him on the right of a midfield 3 with Lundstram and Fleck,but can't really leave Duffy out..Maybe we can go 433 or 442 diamond to include Duffy aswell at times and keep 2 up top if our normal shape isn't working.
Looks like he offers a threat with shots from outside the box from what I've seen...also has a long throw which always causes problems...Think he'll be on the bench to start off with...good signing though for me
 
Personally I think it would allow 2 of Leonard lundstram and fleck to get forward. Duffy’s style allows for runners from midfield, like lundstram goal against Sunderland

True, but I still think we'd be lacking at the sharp end. There'd be a lot of pressure on the striker to deliver.

If we go with one behind a striker it should be Brooks, he can do a lot of Duffy's role but also provide a threat running beyond the striker as well.
 
Last edited:
It might surprise you to hear this but I've got eyes which enable me to see and I can also read.

Nice swerve.

As I say I’ve only seen him a couple of times, hence why I’m not able to provide an informed opinion as to whether he’s better than any of our current players. I can only assume that you’ve seen him play quite a lot.
 
Nice swerve.

As I say I’ve only seen him a couple of times, hence why I’m not able to provide an informed opinion as to whether he’s better than any of our current players. I can only assume that you’ve seen him play quite a lot.
To be fair, I've only seen him once, but Wilder and his scouts have been watching him for a year or so. Due to the incredible patience he has shown with Rug Ron, that tells me he sees him as a first teamer, and not just a squad player.
 
Leonard has to work his way into the team it’s as simple as that.

If you think otherwise put a wager to charity on it? But he will not start against SWFC and rightly so.

CW rates him highly so I assume he’s a good player. But all the new players come in and say how they struggle with our intensity in training. It will take him a while to get use too it.

I hope Leonard hits the ground running and in a few weeks whoever plays has my full backing.

But if you don’t now rate Lundstram I struggle to take your football knowledge serious. CW seems to be rating him so that should be enough. But if not just get ready to Booooooo Leonard’s first misplaced pass.
 
To be fair, I've only seen him once, but Wilder and his scouts have been watching him for a year or so. Due to the incredible patience he has shown with Rug Ron, that tells me he sees him as a first teamer, and not just a squad player.

So your argument for Leonard starting instead of Lundstram is that Wilder wanted him?
 
I should add that I hope you’re right and that Leonard is better than Lundstram because that would mean we’ve got a very good player. At the moment though none of us know if he’s better than Lundstram or not
 
I should add that I hope you’re right and that Leonard is better than Lundstram because that would mean we’ve got a very good player. At the moment though none of us know if he’s better than Lundstram or not
Agreed.
 
Leonard has to work his way into the team it’s as simple as that.

If you think otherwise put a wager to charity on it? But he will not start against SWFC and rightly so.

CW rates him highly so I assume he’s a good player. But all the new players come in and say how they struggle with our intensity in training. It will take him a while to get use too it.

I hope Leonard hits the ground running and in a few weeks whoever plays has my full backing.

But if you don’t now rate Lundstram I struggle to take your football knowledge serious. CW seems to be rating him so that should be enough. But if not just get ready to Booooooo Leonard’s first misplaced pass.
I dont much care if you disagree with me, but please dont misrepresent what i have said. At no time have i said anything derogatory about Lundstram, who is a fine player. My comments are about Wilders opinion of Leonard, and I happen to believe that he has bought him as a first teamer . If he doesnt start next week, it will be shortly after.
 
I dont much care if you disagree with me, but please dont misrepresent what i have said. At no time have i said anything derogatory about Lundstram, who is a fine player. My comments are about Wilders opinion of Leonard, and I happen to believe that he has bought him as a first teamer . If he doesnt start next week, it will be shortly after.

Do you think he would have been signed as a starter if Coutts was still fit?
 



Do you think he would have been signed as a starter if Coutts was still fit?
Very possibly, but not necessarily at the expense of Coutts. At that time Duffy was more at risk I think. I'm talking about the last window by the way.
 
I dont much care if you disagree with me, but please dont misrepresent what i have said. At no time have i said anything derogatory about Lundstram, who is a fine player. My comments are about Wilders opinion of Leonard, and I happen to believe that he has bought him as a first teamer . If he doesnt start next week, it will be shortly after.

Hopefully! I believe he will start in a few weeks as the right sided centre half. He reminds me of Coady. Be a very useful addition to our squad.

I think what CW is trying to build is that there is no one guaranteed to start. So if Lundstram or Fleck don’t produce the goods then Leonard can step in etc.

We saw last year CW will rotate his squad but if your doing well you keep the shirt until you don’t. We saw that many a time last year.
 
Very possibly, but not necessarily at the expense of Coutts. At that time Duffy was more at risk I think. I'm talking about the last window by the way.

The summer window?

Leonard replacing Duffy would have meant a change in the way we play.

Edit: Duffy started the season out the team anyway didn’t he? Didn’t Carruthers start?
 
But if you don’t now rate Lundstram I struggle to take your football knowledge serious.

What a stupid thing to say. Just because I rate one player above another doesn't automatically mean I dislike the other.
 
Let him watch the total humiliation of SWFC in the stands with the rest of us. Then he'll really know what it's like to be a Blade.
 
We’d play a lot better if Lunny started passing in front of players rather than 3 yards behind them

Not what I see at all, but I've had a couple of shandys so feeling mellow. WTF.

I remain to be convinced but he’s got a good attitude so won’t bag him out too much.

That's more like it so have a like.

It's easy to be a soft mellow git when we've won.
 

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom