Anger

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Great question by SwannyBlade,

I agree with Swanny,,..my most angry moment was also the Newcastle 2nd goal. Much of my anger was the injustice.... we were so superior to them on the night.
Its up there with the Sheff Wed 0-0 matches where an away team comes to BL with zero ambition, talk about “parking the bus”.
The United v Newcastle Aldo brought back memories of some of our games in league 1 where the opposition had all 11 men in and around their penalty area for king spells. Wasnt as angry about the ghost goal away at Villa because based on general play a draw was a fair result.
 



Off the back of the controversial red card on Monday, on a scale of 0 to Apoplectic, what's the most angry you've been during our tenure in the Premier League?

The Spurs away clown feet offside had me shouting, ranting and yelling, but the winner for me is Newcastle at home. The Shelvey goal, complete with flagging linesman, players pausing and disbelief wins for me...it was the ex referee trying to justifying it on TV that pushed me over the edge and had me yelling at the screen.

The Villa ghost goal probably would have won but a general apathy and expectation of ineptitude of the officials has set in by then.
It wasn't controversial. Straight red card all day long. If that had been Burke getting manhandled we would say red card too.
 
As someone has said, the Man City away game for me.

Living that way, my rivalry is largely with the Manchester clubs on a day to day basis.

The offside goal, but then the referee blocking Fleck... Another moment where a simple blow of the whistle and some common sense applied and it is never talked about again.

Granted we still possibly and probably may have lost, but its things like that, the Villa ghost goal, the Newcastle Shelvey goal, Lundstrams big toe... where it seems to always happen to us and then forgotten about because we aren't one of the fashionable teams.

Putting my Violin away now 😂
 
It wasn't controversial. Straight red card all day long. If that had been Burke getting manhandled we would say red card too.
The fact that you think it was a straight red and others don't is what makes it controversial.
 
Wednesday 4th March 1959: Norwich City 3 Sheffield United 2 - 3rd Round FA Cup Replay

My first Blades game ever was the first game at the Lane on Saturday 28th February 1959, when we drew 1-1 with them.

I was 8 3/4 years old and we'd been knocked out of the FA Cup by a 3rd Division North team!!!

I was reeely reeely angry!!!!

I was so angry I stabbed my teddy bear!!!

I was even angrier when we were knocked out of the FA Cup the following season by the PIGS!!!........

How long have you got?
 
The most anger I have felt is when they stopped us going to games.

Hand on heart I have not seen a minute of action since Norwich, it is too depressing, especially with this being the best team in my lifetime!!
When Boris announced 6 months yesterday I could have jumped under a train. only the thought of my kids stopped me.
 
Off the back of the controversial red card on Monday

But it wasn't? It was a textbook red card. It's only controversial cause you wish it didn't happen.
I think you're a good team and will do okay this season, but it was a clear red card.

Either way it's just one game in a 38 match season. Losses happen, so no reason for so much negativity on here.
 
Off the back of the controversial red card on Monday, on a scale of 0 to Apoplectic, what's the most angry you've been during our tenure in the Premier League?

The Spurs away clown feet offside had me shouting, ranting and yelling, but the winner for me is Newcastle at home. The Shelvey goal, complete with flagging linesman, players pausing and disbelief wins for me...it was the ex referee trying to justifying it on TV that pushed me over the edge and had me yelling at the screen.

The Villa ghost goal probably would have won but a general apathy and expectation of ineptitude of the officials has set in by then.
Scott was the Ref for the Spurs game,hope we never see him again cos i will just assume summat bad will happen and explode/self combust.
 
The Villa manager pisses me off happy to take a walk in goal from Bielsa to help get them into the play off's, but no thought to do the same in our game happy to cheat the point that ultimately kept them in the Premier League.

Villa had already secured a play off spot before they played Leeds.
 
How can it be a goal scoring opportunity he gave the foul before Watkins even had the ball , joke

probably because he was running onto the ball and would have got it had the foul not been committed. I see it through claret& blue eyes no doubt, as you see it through red and white ones. i thought it was a good decision but can see why you wouldn't
 
No way Watkins go get to the ball Ramsdale booted it away.so how can it be called a goalscoring opportunity.
What was those twats at Stockley park doing?.never said anything to the referee. must have been on a tea break or summat.
Why did the referee not go and look at the monitor? suppose to be premier league directive. Also, the referee was a mile behind the play.
Needed a search party to find the linesman sorry assistant referee. why always us.
 
All the anger on here mostly towards the officials/Var, all got validity in my view which begs a question,
Should we now start & get ‘cute’ (cheat basically). We & Wilder are rightly proud of our approach to the game & none con attitude BUT it’s costing us no question, how do we all feel about our players starting to go down screaming at the slightest touch & rolling around, I don’t like it but it undoubtedly gains other teams an advantage has refs/var haven’t got a clue when their being conned. We all know the worse teams for it, when we play Burnley & Wolves we don’t need to do it.
 



No way Watkins go get to the ball Ramsdale booted it away.so how can it be called a goalscoring opportunity.
What was those twats at Stockley park doing?.never said anything to the referee. must have been on a tea break or summat.
Why did the referee not go and look at the monitor? suppose to be premier league directive. Also, the referee was a mile behind the play.
Needed a search party to find the linesman sorry assistant referee. why always us.
Ha ha! The linesman was there - he signalled for a throw-in
 
Program seller shouting
"£3.50, get yer programs.....£3.50..."
 
Ok, i did not know that listenend on radio Sheffield.saw later on youtube.
 
Off the back of the controversial red card on Monday, on a scale of 0 to Apoplectic, what's the most angry you've been during our tenure in the Premier League?

The Spurs away clown feet offside had me shouting, ranting and yelling, but the winner for me is Newcastle at home. The Shelvey goal, complete with flagging linesman, players pausing and disbelief wins for me...it was the ex referee trying to justifying it on TV that pushed me over the edge and had me yelling at the screen.

The Villa ghost goal probably would have won but a general apathy and expectation of ineptitude of the officials has set in by then.
Same here mate .I expect it now also, BUT i expected it the moment we got promoted remembering the last time we were in the top flight.Nothing has changed.
 
probably because he was running onto the ball and would have got it had the foul not been committed. I see it through claret& blue eyes no doubt, as you see it through red and white ones. i thought it was a good decision but can see why you wouldn't
But the law says the attacker has got to be in possession of the ball while being fouled by the defender for it to be classed as a goal scoring opportunity .Watkins was NOT in possession and the goal keeper seemed to be nearer the ball than the outfield players making him favourite to get the ball.
 
These things even out over a season. That's the usual chestnut.
Wi due a few seasons worth by my reckoning, so let's all relax and have a cup of tea.
 
Same here mate .I expect it now also, BUT i expected it the moment we got promoted remembering the last time we were in the top flight.Nothing has changed.
Talking about the last time we were here surely the clown that awarded Liverpool a penalty because the defender THOUGHT about fouling Gerrard must take the title of Dick head ref award of the century .Did not know that to be a ref you have to be a mind reader to.Never seen that decision before or since .
 
But the law says the attacker has got to be in possession of the ball while being fouled by the defender for it to be classed as a goal scoring opportunity .Watkins was NOT in possession and the goal keeper seemed to be nearer the ball than the outfield players making him favourite to get the ball.
The LTG actually states

"SENDING-OFF OFFENCES
...
  • denying a goal or an obvious goal-scoring opportunity to an opponent whose overall movement is towards the offender's goal by an offence punishable by a free kick (unless as outlined below)"
 
It was never a red card, Watkins committed the initial foul, which would have been evident had the ref had the humility to look at the monitor.

But ask yourself this, if Scott had given Egan a yellow card, do you honestly think Stockley Park would have interfered and upgraded it to a red ?

Not a chance, because their main priority isn’t getting the right decision, it’s validating their colleagues decision and unless there’s a glaringly obvious mistake, that’s what they do.
 
The LTG actually states

"SENDING-OFF OFFENCES
...
  • denying a goal or an obvious goal-scoring opportunity to an opponent whose overall movement is towards the offender's goal by an offence punishable by a free kick (unless as outlined below)"
Dermot Gallagher ex FIFA ref said the ref made a mistake because Watkins was not in possession of the ball and the keeper was the nearest player who was favourite to clear the ball .He went on to say for a player to be shown a red card for stopping a attacker a chance to score the forward must be in possession of the ball which clearly he was not.The ref should have shown a yellow card only and a free kick but seeing it was six of one and half dozen of the other he should just have played on.If the defender had done a Grealish and had fallen down I THINK HE COULD HAVE HAD A FREE KICK.
 
No way Watkins go get to the ball Ramsdale booted it away.so how can it be called a goalscoring opportunity.
What was those twats at Stockley park doing?.never said anything to the referee. must have been on a tea break or summat.
Why did the referee not go and look at the monitor? suppose to be premier league directive. Also, the referee was a mile behind the play.
Needed a search party to find the linesman sorry assistant referee. why always us.
MAY BE THE MONITOR WAS NOT WORKING .IT HAS BEEN KNOWN TO BE FAULTY BEFORE AT VILLA YOU KNOW
 
Dermot Gallagher ex FIFA ref said the ref made a mistake because Watkins was not in possession of the ball and the keeper was the nearest player who was favourite to clear the ball .He went on to say for a player to be shown a red card for stopping a attacker a chance to score the forward must be in possession of the ball which clearly he was not.The ref should have shown a yellow card only and a free kick but seeing it was six of one and half dozen of the other he should just have played on.If the defender had done a Grealish and had fallen down I THINK HE COULD HAVE HAD A FREE KICK.
The rules are online for everyone to see. It was a clear red card. And thus was correctly given.

If you wanna tell yourself otherwise, that's your choice.
 



I very rarely get annoyed by decisions during games anymore. I expect us to get shafted one way or another, the past few seasons have been unforgettable but the footballing gods have us in their sights once more..

I’ll say it here and now. We will be relegated this season, I’ll happily eat humble pie but I just can’t see us surviving.
 

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom