Incoming? Alan Nixon on twitter

[Flatulent_Bob]

He's better than anything we have at the moment. He's better than Lolley too, so it would make sense.

If we're to pay over the odds for a Premier league player, I'd rather it to be for a proven Premier league player, instead of someone who's never played at that level.

 

[gavtheblade]

I reckon Murphy.

 

[bladesmanluke]

If we're to pay over the odds for a Premier league player, I'd rather it to be for a proven Premier league player, instead of someone who's never played at that level.

A proven premier league player won't be dropping down to the championship on loan, unless they're 36 and their legs have gone.

 

[FinchleyBlade]

That would be under whelming and not something most would consider really ambitious would they?

Totally disagree. He is exactly what we lack and is better than anything else we have going forward.

Brooks and Murphy in the same side would be a great sight to see.

 

[SteveBlade]

Paul Ifill

 

[Tazzy]

Andros Townsend

 

[robbiez666]

I doubt he'd last a day with our training.

 

[robbiez666]

It's slightly mystifying if Lolley is our second choice and won't be allowed to go out on loan.

 

[PaddysMad]

Boga is leaving Chelsea according to some replies to his last tweet.

Follows Blackman on twitter former roommates some say lovers.

 

[Th!stledo]

He said it's a premier league loan.

Who? Christ knows. Could be anyone.

Could be McManaman, Wayne Routledge, Marc Pugh, Skalak. Lots of players this could be who aren't quite around their starting 11's right now.

Why have you put a 't' on the end of CW's name????

 

[Flatulent_Bob]

A proven premier league player won't be dropping down to the championship on loan, unless they're 36 and their legs have gone.

I'm not saying Murphy wouldn't improve our side, but he's not worth paying over the odds for and it can't be considered hugely ambitious.

 

[Slim Man]

Why have you put a 't' on the end of CW's name????

I'm pretty sure I spelled it right. It is Christ Wilder isn't it?

 

[TheGoatPenguin]

So if it's a "wide man." Does this mean we are ditching the 532, 352, 32212 ??? The current formation?

We have two wingers already. Duffy doesn't play there and Thomas hasn't had much of a look in. Can't see either of the wing backs being dropped myself.

 

[Treeton Blade]

That would be under whelming and not something most would consider really ambitious would they?

Brighton saw him as an ambitious signing, and ended up in the Premier league

 

[Treeton Blade]

says were after a wide man on loan and it's very ambitious as lolley is the second choice to this mystery player.. Alan is usually spot on.

He usually is, but didn`t he say we had agreed a £750,000 fee for Lolley?

 

[ShockingBadBuy]

Adam Reach

Grrrrrrrrrrrr

 

[AlanWrightsShinyHead]

He usually is, but didn`t he say we had agreed a £750,000 fee for Lolley?

Wagner told Alan Biggs last night that he sees Lolley as part of their squad this season and is pushing hard for a first team place

 

[Kozzy_is_my_Dad]

Typo on Nixon's part.

He said we're after another winger for the end of the transfer window. He actually meant whinger.

You know, for on here, to kick off when it all goes tits up.

 

[Harrisblade]

He actually meant whinger.

You mean that one of US might actually get to be part of the team?

 

[sheffielder]

That would be under whelming and not something most would consider really ambitious would they?

No but his mate knockheart would be but we can only dream!

 

[Flatulent_Bob]

Brighton saw him as an ambitious signing, and ended up in the Premier league

They bought him from a league one club, and he wasn't even their top signing how did they see it as ambitious?
Is there a current league one player we'd see as an ambitious signing?

 

[derfblade.3]

Fernando For.....?

 

[Blade58]

Fernando For.....?

why would we want that pri........?

 

[Treeton Blade]

They bought him from a league one club, and he wasn't even their top signing how did they see it as ambitious?
Is there a current league one player we'd see as an ambitious signing?

Ricky Holmes

 

[Cerberus Blade]

Coady then

since when has Coady been a "wide man"?

 

[1973Blade]

Tony Towner. I loved that name.

 

[Cerberus Blade]

Ricky Holmes

John C Holmes?

 

[Cerberus Blade]

If we're to pay over the odds for a Premier league player, I'd rather it to be for a proven Premier league player, instead of someone who's never played at that level.

No one said anything about "paying" did they? This will be one of them government sponsored work experience schemes I think.

 

[Cerberus Blade]

So if it's a "wide man." Does this mean we are ditching the 532, 352, 32212 ??? The current formation?

No, we're just switching to a cheaper tariff using an 0344 number.

 

[mancunianblade]

My guess is Ryan Kent or Jamie Murphy

Neither are in the Championship

*Edit* skipped to next page to see Correction to Premier League. I think Murphy would be a good shout.. its one of two type of player imo either a young loanee who is highly thought of or someone of caliber with a connection to the club like Murphy. Wasn't the story before he left that he didn't want to leave and he had bought a houseboat here and settled?