This isn't aimed just at you.
But....
All these people who claim that PH is tactically niave/rigid, is poor in his choice of substitutions etc, had no 'plan b', or simply 'doesn't know what he's doing', I have a question.
Aside from your right to have an opinion (and I defend that right strongly), what err... qualifications/acquired professional knowledge do you have to make that judgement?
I'm assuming the majority of us on here hold down fairly regular types of jobs or are retired/in between careers etc. So to be in a position to make , in some cases such positive assertions about a bloke who has been in the professional game over 30 years and is obviously (or so it appears to me) a thoughtful, measured individual, puzzles me..
Or....we have plenty of seasoned professional football people posting on here and not folk who see us 90/180 minutes per week at the most...
Charlieblade being the exception, he always has a view that suggests he has the same view as me...