A bit of Maths

[Lampiao]

So Usain Bolt can run 100 meters in under 10 seconds - lets assume Lundstrum running down the wing at a tenth that speed - that's 10 meters in 10 seconds or 1 meter per second. TV cameras work on a frame rate of 50 frames per second. So Lundstrum would move 1 meter divided by 50 between each frame, that's 2cm or just under an inch. The VAR camera doesn't have the resolution to differentiate distances less than that at that speed. Therefore the decision was invalid with the technology used.

 

[Ainsley Harriott]

So Usain Bolt can run 100 meters in under 10 seconds - lets assume Lundstrum running down the wing at a tenth that speed - that's 10 meters in 10 seconds or 1 meter per second. TV cameras work on a frame rate of 50 frames per second. So Lundstrum would move 1 meter divided by 50 between each frame, that's 2cm or just under an inch. The VAR camera doesn't have the resolution to differentiate distances less than that at that speed. Therefore the decision was invalid with the technology used.

I like the maths.

But you'll be hammered for starting another thread....

 

[Blade for Sale]

So Usain Bolt can run 100 meters in under 10 seconds - lets assume Lundstrum running down the wing at a tenth that speed - that's 10 meters in 10 seconds or 1 meter per second. TV cameras work on a frame rate of 50 frames per second. So Lundstrum would move 1 meter divided by 50 between each frame, that's 2cm or just under an inch. The VAR camera doesn't have the resolution to differentiate distances less than that at that speed. Therefore the decision was invalid with the technology used.

That's numberwang!

 

[vas borbokis]

 

[BadgersBigToe]

View attachment 64267

 

[PeterNdlovu081]

So Usain Bolt can run 100 meters in under 10 seconds - lets assume Lundstrum running down the wing at a tenth that speed - that's 10 meters in 10 seconds or 1 meter per second.

That's incredibly slow.

That's over a minute and a half to run 100m.

My Nannan could run that fast.

 

[Klaatu Barada Nikto]

So Usain Bolt can run 100 meters in under 10 seconds - lets assume Lundstrum running down the wing at a tenth that speed - that's 10 meters in 10 seconds or 1 meter per second. TV cameras work on a frame rate of 50 frames per second. So Lundstrum would move 1 meter divided by 50 between each frame, that's 2cm or just under an inch. The VAR camera doesn't have the resolution to differentiate distances less than that at that speed. Therefore the decision was invalid with the technology used.

If a football player could only shift 1 meter a second, they’d be in minus figures on FIFA.

 

[GRUMPY BLADE]

View attachment 64267

If the above is correct why isn't Gina Miller taking them to court to stop the wrong decision being made?

 

[Stevo]

So Usain Bolt can run 100 meters in under 10 seconds - lets assume Lundstrum running down the wing at a tenth that speed - that's 10 meters in 10 seconds or 1 meter per second. TV cameras work on a frame rate of 50 frames per second. So Lundstrum would move 1 meter divided by 50 between each frame, that's 2cm or just under an inch. The VAR camera doesn't have the resolution to differentiate distances less than that at that speed. Therefore the decision was invalid with the technology used.

Let it go

 

[Houston_Blade]

It’s LundstrAm.

 

[PokerBlade]

View attachment 64267

It's come across to me as though the VAR teams want to appear clever by claiming they're now able to judge players offside by the slightest fraction. This is being done without any understanding of how the technology actually works. The maths is so stunningly simple too, and it hasn't even accounted for blur in the picture.

 

[ChipButtyBlade]

View attachment 64267

So in conclusion anything less than 8" the length of my cock,should not be tampered with by VAR,this is a good yardstick to use.

 

[blade67]

So Usain Bolt can run 100 meters in under 10 seconds - lets assume Lundstrum running down the wing at a tenth that speed - that's 10 meters in 10 seconds or 1 meter per second. TV cameras work on a frame rate of 50 frames per second. So Lundstrum would move 1 meter divided by 50 between each frame, that's 2cm or just under an inch. The VAR camera doesn't have the resolution to differentiate distances less than that at that speed. Therefore the decision was invalid with the technology used.

you are correct and he's moving faster than that so it's even worse

 

[GRUMPY BLADE]

So in conclusion anything less than 8" the length of my cock,should not be tampered with by VAR,this is a good yardstick to use.

Our lass says not another one that thinks 8" is a yard,?

 

[Tickhillblade]

So Usain Bolt can run 100 meters in under 10 seconds - lets assume Lundstrum running down the wing at a tenth that speed - that's 10 meters in 10 seconds or 1 meter per second. TV cameras work on a frame rate of 50 frames per second. So Lundstrum would move 1 meter divided by 50 between each frame, that's 2cm or just under an inch. The VAR camera doesn't have the resolution to differentiate distances less than that at that speed. Therefore the decision was invalid with the technology used.

And the speed that the foot connects with the ball maybe anyone of 3 frames. 2.5 inches. Add in the factor of blur and it can't be used for small potential infringements.

 

[blademark]

Our lass says not another one that thinks 8" is a yard,?

Our lass says, 'how come everyone else seems to have an 8" cock, and you're stuck with that fukin monster ?'

 

[GRUMPY BLADE]

Our lass says, 'how come everyone else seems to have an 8" cock, and you're stuck with that fukin monster ?'

Think she was talking about the small bloke next door.

 

[Sparky The Blade]

So Usain Bolt can run 100 meters in under 10 seconds - lets assume Lundstrum running down the wing at a tenth that speed - that's 10 meters in 10 seconds or 1 meter per second. TV cameras work on a frame rate of 50 frames per second. So Lundstrum would move 1 meter divided by 50 between each frame, that's 2cm or just under an inch. The VAR camera doesn't have the resolution to differentiate distances less than that at that speed. Therefore the decision was invalid with the technology used.

I posted this in another thread. I think it would solve the problems we are having with VAR.

The camera not being in line creates an inaccuracy. The pixelated image creates an inaccuracy. The 50fps that VAR works at creates an inaccuracy. The timing of the ball leaving the players foot creates an inaccuracy.

The level of inaccuracy should be calculated to a distance. Then that distance is depicted in the thickness of the lines to build a tolerance either side. If the two lines overlap at all then it is within the goldilocks zone and should be deemed level. Thats how VAR should work.

 

[Swannyblade]

I posted this in another thread. I think it would solve the problems we are having with VAR.

The camera not being in line creates an inaccuracy. The pixelated image creates an inaccuracy. The 50fps that VAR works at creates an inaccuracy. The timing of the ball leaving the players foot creates an inaccuracy.

The level of inaccuracy should be calculated to a distance. Then that distance is depicted in the thickness of the lines to build a tolerance either side. If the two lines overlap at all then it is within the goldilocks zone and should be deemed level. Thats how VAR should work.

This’ll do for me - get yourself to Stockley Park!

 

[boss hog]

Put the line in the right place and not through the defenders knee and shoulder and you don't need a maths degree.

 

[GRUMPY BLADE]

I posted this in another thread. I think it would solve the problems we are having with VAR.

The camera not being in line creates an inaccuracy. The pixelated image creates an inaccuracy. The 50fps that VAR works at creates an inaccuracy. The timing of the ball leaving the players foot creates an inaccuracy.

The level of inaccuracy should be calculated to a distance. Then that distance is depicted in the thickness of the lines to build a tolerance either side. If the two lines overlap at all then it is within the goldilocks zone and should be deemed level. Thats how VAR should work.

Or we scrap it?

 

[Stevo]

Divok origis cock must be constantly offside

 

[Greasy Chap Butty]

So Usain Bolt can run 100 meters in under 10 seconds - lets assume Lundstrum running down the wing at a tenth that speed - that's 10 meters in 10 seconds or 1 meter per second. TV cameras work on a frame rate of 50 frames per second. So Lundstrum would move 1 meter divided by 50 between each frame, that's 2cm or just under an inch. The VAR camera doesn't have the resolution to differentiate distances less than that at that speed. Therefore the decision was invalid with the technology used.

Add into that the inaccuracy of when the ball was played, it's even more bollocks. Have they got VAR zoomed in to when the passer plays the ball? Is it when his foot hits the ball or when the ball leaves his foot? How can a camera get the right angle for either?

 

[Snake]

Our lass says, 'how come everyone else seems to have an 8" cock, and you're stuck with that fukin monster ?'

8" no chance ..... I'm not folding my in half.

 

[CornwallBlade]

So in conclusion anything less than 8" the length of my cock,should not be tampered with by VAR,this is a good yardstick to use.

Nice idea but it may cause a bit of trouble from the namby pamby pc brigade when they use that as part of the review system

 

[blademark]

8" no chance ..... I'm not folding my in half.

Snake by name......

 

[GRUMPY BLADE]

8" no chance ..... I'm not folding my in half.

We all know why your called snake but rubbing our noses in it?

 

[RMBlade]

View attachment 64267

This also doesn’t take into account the potential for defenders stepping up... highly unlikely that the whole back line are travelling at 34.97kmph but the 20cm figure could be significantly higher taking into account defender movement.

 

[skyjam]

This also doesn’t take into account the potential for defenders stepping up... highly unlikely that the whole back line are travelling at 34.97kmph but the 20cm figure could be significantly higher taking into account defender movement.

just get fuckin rid of it
every year some twat tries to add a rule or take away one
for what? ffs leave it alone ,if the idea is to garner more world customers then any interest shown by them is proof they like it as is

 

[Cerberus Blade]

I posted this in another thread. I think it would solve the problems we are having with VAR.

The camera not being in line creates an inaccuracy. The pixelated image creates an inaccuracy. The 50fps that VAR works at creates an inaccuracy. The timing of the ball leaving the players foot creates an inaccuracy.

The level of inaccuracy should be calculated to a distance. Then that distance is depicted in the thickness of the lines to build a tolerance either side. If the two lines overlap at all then it is within the goldilocks zone and should be deemed level. Thats how VAR should work.

I’ve got an idea....

what if VAR was only used to “assist” the referee when he had doubts about a “match changing” decision that he could not resolve through discussion with his other 3 officials who are seeing it live, like him?

What if the decision to use VAR was his and his alone, rather than a voice in his tab telling him he was going to be checked up on?

What if he had the power (balls) to say “Ta VAR, but I’m sticking with my original decision”?