Ndiayewillalwaysloveyou
ST holder
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2022
- Messages
- 11,522
- Reaction score
- 17,253
Which players is he meaning then?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
Which players is he meaning then?
Ayew is his new project..he,ll be getting plenty of game time now..he just mentioned all the negativity about his signing..he,ll want to prove people wrong.But then goes on about Ayew who looked knackered after 5 minutes of being on the pitch and miss controlled the ball when clean though one on one with the keeper
Surely there is a youth kid we could play that is better than Ayew
Which players is he meaning then?
There is, Onè.But then goes on about Ayew who looked knackered after 5 minutes of being on the pitch and miss controlled the ball when clean though one on one with the keeper
Surely there is a youth kid we could play that is better than Ayew
I think Rothwell actually sensed the game was stale and tried to inject something, but those around him were far too conservative.Says he has no problems in who to pick and team for saturday...... will still play 442 hoof to bamford/cannon.
But to answer question i would hazard a guess at the following.
Campbell
Riedewald
Rothwell
Well, we weren't behind, so there's that.He thought we were OK first half…
He said that the players did not do what he wanted them to do; yet correct me if I am wrong but they do the same thing every match as he is seemingly incapable of changing tactics to suit situations and his substitutions never alter the way we play.
He cannot even make good excuses
Reiderweld is giving uninterested body language, but then his style is languid, but he looked fed up last night.Contradictory.
He said in his pre match nobody would be giving an half arsed performance as we're not like premier league teams who get beat against lower league opposition. WRONG!
Id suggest Rothwell, Campbell and Riedewald as mentioned above are all in the firing line. Players he brought in recently or gave new contracts to. You can't make this shit up...
I'd go along with that but reverse the order.Says he has no problems in who to pick and team for saturday...... will still play 442 hoof to bamford/cannon.
But to answer question i would hazard a guess at the following.
Campbell
Riedewald
Rothwell
He plays like hes injected something.I think Rothwell actually sensed the game was stale and tried to inject something, but those around him were far too conservative.
It was in no particular order, should have mentioned it. They are all equally as shit and lazy and seemingly just along for the pay cheque and nothing else.I'd go along with that but reverse the order.
Rothwell was especially frustrating with his repetetive sideways passing.
I fear CW's comments could lead to several 'enemies within'
Doherty as well otherwise the Hamza deal makes zero sense but Doherty is basically like the Mee deal. Has an okay first game then basically rings it in.Says he has no problems in who to pick and team for saturday...... will still play 442 hoof to bamford/cannon.
But to answer question i would hazard a guess at the following.
Campbell
Riedewald
Rothwell
I debated adding him to my list, as he was only a handful that looked like he cared and actually tried (1st half) put some effort in. But in saying that he got worse as the game went on like someone spiked his drink, then full on imploded after his own goal and lost his head.I think I'd add RND to that list as well,
One of the reasons I liked COH was that he actually ran around and looked like he gave a shit. Similarly the likes of Ben Osborne or Matty Done. Being physically fit and putting in a shift should be the minimum for any player.He plays like hes injected something.
Slow, lazy disinterested. Funny just like rest of the squad bar 3 or 4 players out of the 25 man squad.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?