If we are going to change the manager it needs to be done now.

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Leonardo Green

Active Member
Joined
May 28, 2015
Messages
1,594
Reaction score
1,426
I think it would be a mistake to change the manager again. But if the board want to do this then an even bigger mistake would be allowing a manager that's not going to be here plan next season, AGAIN.

A new manager should get some games this season to see what is needed and the full summer to plan.

So either change the manager now, or come out and say there will be no change, so we can stop the speculation.
 



I think it would be a mistake to change the manager again. But if the board want to do this then an even bigger mistake would be allowing a manager that's not going to be here plan next season, AGAIN.

A new manager should get some games this season to see what is needed and the full summer to plan.

So either change the manager now, or come out and say there will be no change, so we can stop the speculation.
I know what you're saying but that means planning ahead and we don't seem to do that all that well.
 
I am getting more tired of Mr Adkins as every game passes but I don't believe he should be sacked.....yet.
I would give him the opportunity to rebuild in the summer and assess the situation around Christmas. I am worried though that McCabe will not back him sufficiently to make the impact that is required.
 
Would make sense getting rid now after this clusterfuck of a season to allow whoever takes over a full pre-season, but just not gonna happen.
 
fmqt88.gif


Bloody hell - that could set off an epileptic fit Alf!
 
Adkins has all the hallmarks of another Haslam. Forget his CV and how many managers we have sacked recently and base any judgement on his future here on what he's done since arriving at the Lane imo get shut and get shut now.
But he has been in charge of this summer's recruitment since January
 
I think it would be a mistake to change the manager again. But if the board want to do this then an even bigger mistake would be allowing a manager that's not going to be here plan next season, AGAIN.

A new manager should get some games this season to see what is needed and the full summer to plan.

So either change the manager now, or come out and say there will be no change, so we can stop the speculation.

Adkins sounds like he has already been making plans for pre season and lining up signings for the summer. That's if his interview pre-match is anything to go on.
 



We shouldn't sack him. I could see some potential v Oldham & id give him next season as long as we are around top 6
 
We shouldn't sack him. I could see some potential v Oldham & id give him next season as long as we are around top 6
Sixth season in L1 and happy to be around top 6? Ffs - can our expectations get any lower?

As for Oldham - a pub team could show some potential against them.
 
Adkins has all the hallmarks of another Haslam. Forget his CV and how many managers we have sacked recently and base any judgement on his future here on what he's done since arriving at the Lane imo get shut and get shut now.
This hits the nail pretty firmly on the head. You need to base judgements on managers on they're performance alone, absolutely nothing else. To use what has happened in the past to form opinions on whether to sack managers is an amateur way to run a football club, because if they do as I predict and don't sack him because we've sacked too many managers in the past then what will happen is they will be taking those (right or wrong) decisions to sack previous managers to invariably force them into making a wrong decision in not sacking him without realising. To use an analogy, mobile phones works pretty well where the phone is the manager and the owner is the board.

Wilson - You choose a decent phone and it's performing pretty well. For some reason you decide to replace it. This is not the fault of the phone but the fault of the phone owner for replacing a phone that didn't need replacing.

Weir - You choose a cheap phone that hasn't really been proven to work before. It transpires to be extremely faulty so you get it replaced. This is the fault of the phone for being faulty but more so the fault of the phone owner for choosing a phone they knew might be faulty.

Clough - You choose another phone, a big improvement on the previous phone but in the following year starts to really underperform, so you get it replaced. This is the fault of the phone for being faulty but more so the fault of the phone owner for choosing the wrong phone.

Napkins - You're fed up choosing shit phones from the previous 2 so you go all out and blow it all for the latest new iPhone. Very surprisingly and against the odds, it starts performing remarkably badly, even worse than the previous one. This is purely the fault of the phone for being shit and not the fault of the phone owner.

Now, you don't just not replace it and put up with a terrible phone because you've been a shit phone owner in the past and chosen phones that don't work. Even though you did everything you could this time to choose a phone that would work by going for the most expensive, you accept you have been unlucky for once in choosing yet another faulty one and get it replaced.
 
Sixth season in L1 and happy to be around top 6? Ffs - can our expectations get any lower?

As for Oldham - a pub team could show some potential against them.

Obviously I didn't mean in may but I was thinking we need to be in the promotion race whixh would include top 6 by next January February
 
I still think they haven't made up their minds yet, a disastrous run in and no great take up on the season tickets and they may still pull the trigger.

Yes, no immediate success in terms of points or pounds, so let's fuck him off and get the next one in, slightly lower down the list, see if that works.
 
This hits the nail pretty firmly on the head. You need to base judgements on managers on they're performance alone, absolutely nothing else. To use what has happened in the past to form opinions on whether to sack managers is an amateur way to run a football club, because if they do as I predict and don't sack him because we've sacked too many managers in the past then what will happen is they will be taking those (right or wrong) decisions to sack previous managers to invariably force them into making a wrong decision in not sacking him without realising. To use an analogy, mobile phones works pretty well where the phone is the manager and the owner is the board.

Wilson - You choose a decent phone and it's performing pretty well. For some reason you decide to replace it. This is not the fault of the phone but the fault of the phone owner for replacing a phone that didn't need replacing.

Weir - You choose a cheap phone that hasn't really been proven to work before. It transpires to be extremely faulty so you get it replaced. This is the fault of the phone for being faulty but more so the fault of the phone owner for choosing a phone they knew might be faulty.

Clough - You choose another phone, a big improvement on the previous phone but in the following year starts to really underperform, so you get it replaced. This is the fault of the phone for being faulty but more so the fault of the phone owner for choosing the wrong phone.

Napkins - You're fed up choosing shit phones from the previous 2 so you go all out and blow it all for the latest new iPhone. Very surprisingly and against the odds, it starts performing remarkably badly, even worse than the previous one. This is purely the fault of the phone for being shit and not the fault of the phone owner.

Now, you don't just not replace it and put up with a terrible phone because you've been a shit phone owner in the past and chosen phones that don't work. Even though you did everything you could this time to choose a phone that would work by going for the most expensive, you accept you have been unlucky for once in choosing yet another faulty one and get it replaced.

Ergo...if it's true for electrical devices then it must be true for football managers.
 
I still think they haven't made up their minds yet, a disastrous run in and no great take up on the season tickets and they may still pull the trigger.

No, he will deffo be here next season now, there is no money so they may as well let the incumbent who knows the issues try again and hope he can wheel and deal in the correct areas.

...if he signs Hammond though....
 



We shouldn't sack him. I could see some potential v Oldham & id give him next season as long as we are around top 6

I'm sure United fans saw some potential when Haslam's Blades knocked European Champions Liverpool out of the League Cup in 1978 ... nine months later we were relegated to the 3rd division for the first time in our history.

We've only played well twice this season against Bradford and Oldham (even Haslam's lot had the odd good game, 5-1 v Notts Co, 3-0 v Spammers, 3-1 at St James Park), which for me isn't good enough, especially when we have been dreadful in a lot of games.

For whatever reason it aint working under Adkins, get shut for me.
 

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom