Perhaps so but he couldn't do much about it with the size of our squad plus no one wanting our players.
- How long did he take to assess the squad? Was this an incredibly unreasonable length of time?
- Could he have gone on the trusted advice of the staff in situ for player assessments, thereby saving time and increasing the chance of capturing targets?
- Would it have been better if he had prioritised the positions most in need of signings?
- Would it have been better to have plan B options in those positions had he not got his first choice?
- Would it have been better to not make the most underperforming player the captain? Thereby increasing the pressure on himself to play someone that is going to make the team worse.
A big and indisputable yes to all of the above.
- Is it wise to chase young and athletic players on their way up as opposed to old, slow journeymen on their way down?
How can he capture targets if the squad is too big and he's unable to bring players in because of this? He's hardly going to trust people who he hasn't worked with.
Yes it would, but again, did he have enough money to make the signings he wanted?
I think he may have signed plan B options in a couple of positions already, although that's only my incline and i could be way off mark.
Mceveley shouldn't have been made captain, this has been overwhelmingly discussed and i think most were in agreement.
No it's not wise. I agree, you have to have a good balance though of youth and experience, hopefully he will achieve this if given enough time.
Hope this helps.