Connor sammon

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

S

Sunjihi

Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2015
Messages
132
Reaction score
844
Who looks at Connor sammon and thinks " you know that lad he'd make a cracking left winger " when you bring him on for Done as we did today you need to go 4-4-2 scougs and Adams out wide sammon up front or when you take scougs off to bring JCR on , Adams on one wing JCR on other sammon up front easy !! Why do managers seem to over complicate things ?
 



Sunjihi said:
Who looks at Connor sammon and thinks " you know that lad he'd make a cracking left winger " when you bring him on for Done as we did today you need to go 4-4-2 scougs and Adams out wide sammon up front or when you take scougs off to bring JCR on , Adams on one wing JCR on other sammon up front easy !! Why do managers seem to over complicate things ?
Click to expand...

I thought he changed it to 4-4-2? Someone in another thread said that going from 4-3-3 to 4-4-2 is what halted the momentum.

Are you saying he put Sammon on left? Who went upfront?
 
Sunjihi said:
Who looks at Connor sammon and thinks " you know that lad he'd make a cracking left winger " when you bring him on for Done as we did today you need to go 4-4-2 scougs and Adams out wide sammon up front or when you take scougs off to bring JCR on , Adams on one wing JCR on other sammon up front easy !! Why do managers seem to over complicate things ?
Click to expand...
I think that this was the most bizarre thin today. I would have taken Baxter and Scougall off,put Reed next to Basham and played two wide. He could even have gone to 3 at the back but he seemed clueless want to do when they went to ten men. In fairness the 15 mins up to the sending off we played OK but after that we seemed to go into panic mode which had a clear effect on the away fans watching
 
Against 10 men it's important to have width and it's important to keep the ball. Reed for Scougall and JCR for Adams would've been the right way to go.

I couldn't actually think of anything worse than putting a donkey of a centre forward on the wing in these circumstances.
 
Well we can't take Billy the managers favourite off can we ?
 
Sammon came on today and it wouldn't have mattered where he played, he had a touch like a baby elephant. In his defence he wasn't the only one who was utter crap today. The vast majority were with the exception of young Harrison who had a decent game.
 
mattbianco1 said:
I thought he changed it to 4-4-2? Someone in another thread said that going from 4-3-3 to 4-4-2 is what halted the momentum.

Are you saying he put Sammon on left? Who went upfront?
Click to expand...
Sammon was wide left,JCR wide right and Sharp down the middle. No idea where Adams was supposed to be playing and I don't think he did either
 
bartman said:
Sammon was wide left,JCR wide right and Sharp down the middle. No idea where Adams was supposed to be playing and I don't think he did either
Click to expand...
Adams sort of played behind the front two and Baxter dropped deeper. At this point we surrendered any chance if winning (not that the players particularly wanted all 3 points)
 



If someone can explain to me how Scougall got a starting spot, I would love to hear it. Otis Khan, one of our academy lads, has the same pace, but a solid build and a no-nonsense attitude.

Sorry Scougs, but it's a "no" from me.....
 
I remember Norway playing Justein Flo on the left wing against England. It worked too and Graham Taylor was on his way to the exit via Amsterdam. just saying like
 
spongebobblade said:
Sammon came on today and it wouldn't have mattered where he played, he had a touch like a baby elephant. In his defence he wasn't the only one who was utter crap today. The vast majority were with the exception of young Harrison who had a decent game.
Click to expand...

Spongebob, his touch was no worse than a lot today, but putting him on the wing?

Young Harrison looked promising today, just did the basics but that was all we expected.
 
On a plus note Grappler I posted in a different thread that young Harrison ( cus lets be honest, we can't spell his last name!) had a decent game and looked quite commanding. His passing was of a decent tempo and he used the ball well. Almost got caught out by Poleon first half but grew in confidence as the game went on. As for Sammon, he's offered us so little after a great game at Peterborough but why he isn't central with Billy With Che and JCR wide can only be answered by Nigel
 
spongebobblade said:
On a plus note Grappler I posted in a different thread that young Harrison ( cus lets be honest, we can't spell his last name!) had a decent game and looked quite commanding. His passing was of a decent tempo and he used the ball well. Almost got caught out by Poleon first half but grew in confidence as the game went on. As for Sammon, he's offered us so little after a great game at Peterborough but why he isn't central with Billy With Che and JCR wide can only be answered by Nigel
Click to expand...

er excuse me young man, but I spell his name correctly every time! ;)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harrison_McGahey

Yes Poleon seemed dangerous at times, but the young defender did well, let's not forget he is only 20 years old.
 
super_pig said:
gone in the jtw then.. undisclosed fee??
Click to expand...

Of course......;)

He genuinely played well today pal, I think he is just realising how strong he is, if he did some "Maguire like' runs straight through the middle of the park, he would cause problems
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

The Vicar
Strikers, but goal scorers??
Replies
1
Views
281
bertieblade
bertieblade
Champagneblade
Squad far more suited to 3 at the back
Replies
3
Views
536
Houston_Blade
Houston_Blade
C
The subs today
Replies
9
Views
1K
GymClassHero
GymClassHero
Latters
Players Out of Position
Replies
4
Views
479
joe casey
joe casey
U
4-4-2 for the play-offs?
2
Replies
55
Views
5K
Tony_Kaufman
Tony_Kaufman

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom