Tevez Billboard - Wednesday fan by any chance?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?




its a random sky poster its in manchester too
he played for both

I always like to thank him for the 20 m west ham had to give us , eventually after 5 years
softened the blow

but it shows him in west ham kit a team he was never legally registered with so its in error
 
I always like the fact theres a "Bramalls Flooring" shop across from the pig ground, a lot of pigs i know hate that shop cos of its name, sad i know.
 
3504302026.jpg


This should have been on the billboard instead.
 
Tossers.

Any chance that they'll be placing a billboard of Swan, Kay and Layne outside the bookies in Swillsborough?

Welcome Koz, I see you've finally taken the plunge. I transferred here some time ago, probably at the time BM's technical problem's began.

Nice to see you mate, hope you'll enjoy your time here.
 



Tossers.

Any chance that they'll be placing a billboard of Swan, Kay and Layne outside the bookies in Swillsborough?
Whilst we're on the subject, didn't your dad score a perfectly good goal against wet spam that would have been enough for us to stay up had it not been chalked off?
 
Really could not care about Tevez. West Ham I have never been a fan of, even before the relegation stuff. This billboard, I also could not give a stuff about
 
Whilst we're on the subject, didn't your dad score a perfectly good goal against wet spam that would have been enough for us to stay up had it not been chalked off?

Certainly did - West Spam's goalie clattered into his own defender, we slotted in the loose ball, and they got a free kick :confused:
 
Not keen on West Ham (mainly cos of Samuels and a few other dickehead spammers attitude around the whole affair) but don't bear any particular ill will to Tevez personally. If anything, my estimation of him went down due to his antics at City (refusing to play etc) rather than anything surrounding our relegation.
 
It wasn't Tevez, West Ham or the FA that got us relegated; it was managerial and player mistakes and losing Hulse when we did.

We were one goal from staying up and had our fate in our own hands. Let's ignore these non-news stories and concentrate on supporting the Blades out of Div 3!
 
The actual events and the relegation upset me less now it's so long ago, but what still riles me is people denying the truth of what happened. I understand that the PL and WHU board had to lie about it to keep WHU up, but why do fans of every other club and the media deny the truth to this day? If people find it funny that we got relegated, fine. If they find it funny that we got relegated because WHU cheated, fine. If they want to find it funny that the PL effectively chose WHU over us, fine. But people find it funny that Blades fans will state the fact that WHU were not punished for the second breach of the rules and that Tevez was still not legally registered to play in the final 3 matches. No, they say that's not true and at no point did WHU break any rules at all. THAT's what still winds me up.

If any other league club suffers something anywhere remotely like that, their fans will get no sympathy from me.
 
The actual events and the relegation upset me less now it's so long ago, but what still riles me is people denying the truth of what happened. I understand that the PL and WHU board had to lie about it to keep WHU up, but why do fans of every other club and the media deny the truth to this day? If people find it funny that we got relegated, fine. If they find it funny that we got relegated because WHU cheated, fine. If they want to find it funny that the PL effectively chose WHU over us, fine. But people find it funny that Blades fans will state the fact that WHU were not punished for the second breach of the rules and that Tevez was still not legally registered to play in the final 3 matches. No, they say that's not true and at no point did WHU break any rules at all. THAT's what still winds me up.

If any other league club suffers something anywhere remotely like that, their fans will get no sympathy from me.

You could argue it has but on a smaller scale. Sunderland escaped points deduction earlier last year and no one seemed to give a shit as much because the player was a bit of a no mark.

Sunderland set to escape points deduction over fielding ineligible player
• Further punishment over Ji Dong-won unlikely
• Steve Bruce: 'They should be in serious trouble'

Friday 4 April 2014 11.07 BST Last modified on Tuesday 3 June 2014 10.00 BST

Sunderland are unlikely to face any further punishment for the clerical error which led to them fielding an ineligible player in four Premier League games and a Capital One Cup tie earlier this season.

The club have already received a six figure fine from the Premier League for playing Ji Dong-won, mainly as a substitute, in league matches against Fulham, Southampton, Crystal Palace and Manchester United, as well as the League Cup victory against MK Dons when he lacked international clearance. In theory the case could have gone to an independent commission and Sunderland might have been deducted a point – or points – in addition to being thrown out of the Capital One Cup but there were significant mitigating factors.

Foremost among them was that Ji, a South Korea striker, was registered with the Premier League at the time and listed in Sunderland's 25 man squad. The 22-year-old had received international clearance when he joined the club in 2011 but the mistake was made after he returned from a loan spell in the Bundesliga with Augsburg.

A minor error in a form submitted to Fifa on his return from Germany meant that, contrary to Sunderland's understanding, Ji no longer had international clearance after all but the Premier League are confident the slip was unintentional. Moreover, once the problem in the paperwork was spotted last October, Sunderland immediately admitted the mix-up to the Premier League. The ruling body then decided the case would be settled by its board rather than an independent commission and imposed a "significant" fine.

Due to fact that it revolved around a Fifa form which had not been filled in properly, the Premier League also decided that the punishment – news of which emerged only on Thursday night – would be kept discreet. Sunderland's rivals can hardly complain that Ji offered them much advantage; they collected only one point – at Southampton – from the games in which he was involved.

A club spokesperson said on Friday: "The issue of Ji Dong-won was explained in detail to (Friday's) Premier League shareholders meeting and no issues were raised by any club. Sunderland AFC confirmed that they had complied with all the procedures and the Premier League stated that the player was duly registered on the extranet system and in all other Premier League mechanisms.

"The club has never accepted any wrongdoing, but did acknowledge that a technical fault occurred and as such, were fined by the Premier League accordingly in December. The matter is now closed."

There is a reasonable possibility that a relegation rival could appeal against the Premier League's decision not to impose a points penalty. The Hull City manager, Steve Bruce, said on Friday that his former side should be in "serious trouble".

"That's pretty bizarre stuff that it's only surfaced now and he's played in four games. They should be in serious trouble, I would have thought."

Asked if he would expect a club fielding an ineligible player to be handed a points deduction, Bruce said: "It's the first I have heard of it and it will be interesting, I would have thought so though."

Sunderland are 19th in the Premier League table, four points adrift of safety with eight games to play, while Bruce's Hull are eight points clear of them in 14th spot. Cardiff City occupy 18th position and are one point ahead of Sunderland going into Saturday's home match with Crystal Palace.

Ole Gunnar Solskjaer was less concerned than Bruce that Sunderland's transgression should have resulted in a points deduction. "First of all they noticed, held their hands up and you have to admire that," the Cardiff manager said. "The FA have acted and we have to accept that. I did not expect points to be deducted. We accept the outcome. We have to trust them to make the right decision according to the rules. We have to go up there [The Stadium of Light] and take three points off them."

While there is a certain irony that Sunderland reached the Capital One Cup final, losing to Manchester City, Paolo Di Canio's then team were losing to MK Dons in the 49th minute when Ji was withdrawn. Without him Sunderland recorded a 4-2 win over the League One side.

MK Dons said in a statement: "The club sought clarification from the Football League regarding the allegations and the League confirmed that they only became aware of the situation in late November.

"The club acknowledges that the Football League board dealt with the situation as they saw fit and will not be pursuing the matter further."

http://www.theguardian.com/football...i-dong-won-points-deduction-ineligible-player
 



If it is a Wednesday fan then there's an irony that their time in the Premiership passed without anything worthy of featuring in this campaign.

Indeed - I was going to suggest we crowd-source funding for a rival poster outside Hillsborough, but it's been so long since Wednesday were in the Premier League all records of who scored the fatal goal condemning them have been lost...
 

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom