Michael Doyle does not strike me as the type of person who would dish the dirt like this. But then again, why would he make it up?
It's not an either/or: you can say one thing and have it misinterpreted, wilfully or not, that then gets amplified and distorted - and an innocent off-hand remark becomes an earthquake tearing through the middle of the club - and in particular the defence.
To take one example (which might well be
entirely fictional) Maguire could have been looking for advice, he loves the club, but he wants to play at a higher level. He asks an older pro. Collins says to him: it's a short career, you don't want to finish it wondering "What if?", so have a go. Sounds advice any of us might give or take in that position.
A reasonable well-intentioned comment from an experienced pro to a younger pro then becomes:
Collins advised Maguire to leave
which then becomes
Collins advised Maguire to leave. Where's his loyalty?
This then becomes:
Collins advised Maguire to leave. Where's his loyalty, the bastard?
And it just spirals further and further out of control with Collins destabilizing the club and generally setting back our cause 3 or 4 years.
This sort of thing plays out repeatedly. (Incidentally, it's one reason politicians don't say much.)
It's hard enough making people understand when we are actually there in person talking to them, never mind having those conversations reported (often by people with an axe to grind, an ego to massage, or media to sell) at one, two, or three removes in a highly emotive environment.
I judge Doyle on his interviews, what I've heard him say, and the way he played the game. By that measure, for me, he is a very decent bloke.
The rest is nonsense.