Nade hat trick for reserves

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?


Good good i think he should start against chelski.
 
Nade is becoming an amazing purchase :) - a hat-trick in the reserves get him started against Chelski - and see if he gets 1 there :D
 
Nade is becoming an amazing purchase :) - a hat-trick in the reserves get him started against Chelski - and see if he gets 1 there :D

Because he scored an hat trick in reserves??

Nade still has a hell of a lot to prove, his touch and shooting need to improve a hell of a lot before he can be given a prolonged run in the first team.

At the moment he is nothing more than a half decent squad player who comes on as sub (barring a few games of course)

He has 2 league and 1 cup goals, cup goal against a very poor bury side (good goal though) and the 2 goals in the prem was not hard goals. Lehmann should not have been so far from his goal for his goal against arsenal, and the one against reading was laughable and he nearly squandered it.
 
It's a bit much, expecting a player to score against Chelski after putting three past Darlington reserves. Hardly Real Madrid are they?
 
yer but any one that scoresfor naything shud surely be allowed a chnace agenst aby team be it chelski or fucking kilnhutrst ship o sunday afternon.

nade scoring and stead not scored for a few games now he loks like he needs a rest anyway so i tink we shud give nade one,

if chelski are missing terry still we shud give nade a chance cos i dont think carvalho cud handle the pyshcial presence of him and hulse up front all match and cud sneak somethink from this math in my opinion

i no some on gunna dis agee with me cos im a little biut drunk and tlkin absolutely bollox but if we get a result ill be a genius.
ino that sharpy gunna disagree cos i no that he gunna sat thatbwarnock is gunna go all defensive like at everton ote week wen he put quinn oonf for margan an attcking midfeiled for a defenced and nade on for another option up front ]

so woteer i put i no im gunnaget some stick cos that wot a froum about a team we all support is gunna hev diff wveiw points in end init lol
 
Skinning Toure one of Arsenals best defenders and then slotting the ball home to win us the match. Means he is a half decent squad player ? Cant see Stead doing the kind of stuff Nade can do to be hounest. Nade every time ive seen him has always caused trouble defenders and has rarely ever put a bad performance in. Which is more than can be said about other members of our team. Also true Bury were pretty poor it was still a cracking goal curling shot from the edge of the box into the top corner. I dont see any reason why he shouldnt start against chelsea.
 
Skinning Toure one of Arsenals best defenders and then slotting the ball home to win us the match. Means he is a half decent squad player ? Cant see Stead doing the kind of stuff Nade can do to be hounest. Nade every time ive seen him has always caused trouble defenders and has rarely ever put a bad performance in. Which is more than can be said about other members of our team. Also true Bury were pretty poor it was still a cracking goal curling shot from the edge of the box into the top corner. I dont see any reason why he shouldnt start against chelsea.

Skinning Toure? Well he got past him so I suppose you could define it as that. But he was very very lucky. But credit to him, he got that goal. But if thats the only thing you can mention then it doesn't look too promising hey? Don't get me wrong, I believe he has potential to be a good player, but as it stands he is mediocre. He may cause defenders problems, but thats only because of his size and pace. There is NO end product. And if there is no end product, what chance does he have against one of the best defences in the world?

As for the bury goal, had that been better opposition then he would not have had the time to get such a shot in.
 
Oh the joys of drinking Jim :D

yes i was drunk when i wrote this so give me stick for enjoying my self and having my opinon why not!


Jim. Two words for you on the subject.
SPELL and CHECK



god sake some people on here cant have a an opion on summat with out having ago about how it has bin written first. like i siad already i as drunk so chill winsont.

and yes im drunk again
 
yes i was drunk when i wrote this so give me stick for enjoying my self and having my opinon why not!
on the contrary, i love drunken posts, the amount that i do is unbelievable.
 
on the contrary, i love drunken posts, the amount that i do is unbelievable.
Drunken posts > *

Ever had drunken msn chat? Quality stuff I shall.


Anyways back on topic and why should Nade have the right to start all of a sudden? I'd rather play Stead next week as him and Hulse have looked like a great partnership. Nade is a good player to throw on if need be as he does create havoc but I just wouldn't start him.
 

druke msn ca lol we now all abut tha dont we uke we have some good chats specially last nite lol
 
Nade's got more talent in his right foot than stead has in his whole body, he is raw and frustrating at times but he is a constant threat when given the chance and service.

If you were a defender who would you prefer to play against? Stead or nade? I seriously doubt stead could have caused the arse half as many problems as nade did.

p.s being pissed online is so 1999.
 
i've been pissed since 1975.

;)

haha quality come back. i quite agree wih shrpy as well as disagreeing with him if tht possible,
i like both players but they bring diffent things to the table, nade will bully them about and cause trouble with his pace which is dont think stead has done so far,stead is a good player i dont doubt that he must be to be playing in the premierlegue in the first place so u cant say he not good,
how about this for an idea since we al agree that were gunna get beat why not give hulse a rest n play stead and nade upfornt see what happens if hulse ever injured becaue i tink nade is he back up striker now
 
Nade's got more talent in his right foot than stead has in his whole body, he is raw and frustrating at times but he is a constant threat when given the chance and service.

If you were a defender who would you prefer to play against? Stead or nade? I seriously doubt stead could have caused the arse half as many problems as nade did.

p.s being pissed online is so 1999.
No one is doubting Nade's talent it's just that Stead is more of a better team player and gives more of an effort which will be playing to our strengths.

p.s. you were getting pished when you were 10? ololz.
 
on the contrary, i love drunken posts, the amount that i do is unbelievable.

having read through the posts gain i belive i read what u put wrongly and would like ot say tat i was rong having ago at you for what u put
 
having read through the posts gain i belive i read what u put wrongly and would like ot say tat i was rong having ago at you for what u put

I shall get drunk sometime soon and join you in the slurring :D
 
I reckon Hulse plays better without Stead, personally. I think Hulse struggles to read Stead's game sometimes, and I find it strange that Warnock is so happy to play them together and in this case disregard his age-old reasoning about them being too similar.

I do love to see Nade play but he is ridiculous. At the moment I'm not sure what our best forward pairing is, tbh.
 

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom