Roygbiv
Well-Known Member
The problem is, we need him to last 46 games.
He will likely miss 5-6 games due to the Asian Cup. We definitely need another centre half just to cover us for that
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
The problem is, we need him to last 46 games.
He will likely miss 5-6 games due to the Asian Cup. We definitely need another centre half just to cover us for that
It's not a case of "can we afford it". It's more "we're desperately short in 3 positions and shouldn't be spaffing all our budget on a single player".Maybe the people financing the club (the detested COH) have decided that Souttar is worth it and are prepared to pay the required fee.
Presumably they have a better take on their investments than any of us fans - no matter how much we want to slag them off?
The problem is, we need him to last 46 games.
Leicester paid 15m for him.We bought young players based on a poker players recommendation, who happened to have investments in the clubs tje players played for
I like souttar but 10m for a player thats barely played a season in 6 is just madness.
He’s not played over 30 league matches in a season since 20-21, it doesn’t seem likely he’ll play a full season any time soon
Part of the reason for that is Leicester didnt pick him not that he was injured
Ok, £8m and McGuinness for Souttar and Hamzah. That's my final offer. I can't say fairer than that. I can type it, but I can't say it.Chuck Hamzah in and call it a deal … if not walk away
All of them. Don't think they are confirmed until Thursday.What squad number is available for H.
Will definitely be 6.What squad number is available for H.
It is when you have such a disorganised recruitment processBit late for that![]()
I think you misunderstand people's concerns; it isn't the fee per se, and it isn't people saying Harry Souttar ain't any good, but it's spending £10m+ on a Harry Souttar that hasn't completed a full season for over half a decade. It's also the fact that we have seemingly backed ourselves into a corner, where we have given ourselves essentially no other option than paying the full whack that Leicester are after. No one else is (apparently) in for him and we don't appear to have a fall back option to give us a stronger bargaining position. It's a really poor recruitment method and shows no signs of changing.I do have some sympathy with the owners when I read some of the comments because there is always an element of wanting your cake and eating it.
You want Souttar as first choice. He comes with it at a price. You don’t get to have what you want, when you want it at a price you want it. You get two out of those three at best.
On one hand folk will be saying we shouldn’t pay x for Souttar, I’d only pay x - 2m (for example). Well, you wouldn’t get him then.
Roll on two months and the more inferior defender comes in and folk are saying “he’s not as good as Souttar. We should have paid the extra.”
It’s not long back folk we’re bemoaning the club not being held for more money from QPR on their right back, Dunne.
It’s very difficult to please a football fanbase.
Agree, and Wilder sees him as the major signing that will appease the fans and get them back on his side, instead of looking at other positions that need improving, yes, he's good , if fit, but if we can't land him at this late stage then who do we turn tooI think you misunderstand people's concerns; it isn't the fee per se, and it isn't people saying Harry Souttar ain't any good, but it's spending £10m+ on a Harry Souttar that hasn't completed a full season for over half a decade. It's also the fact that we have seemingly backed ourselves into a corner, where we have given ourselves essentially no other option than paying the full whack that Leicester are after. No one else is (apparently) in for him and we don't appear to have a fall back option to give us a stronger bargaining position. It's a really poor recruitment method and shows no signs of changing.
Didn’t work you’re right. Perhaps we should be looking at the guy insisting on the signings then as he may be the real problem?Weve tried the long term thinking with Brewster, McBurnie and to a lesser extent Mousett it failed miserably
The above players had no resale value after us spunking over £40m
We dont know that
You have to get there first hopefully the new owners have a better plan and more momey than the Prince
We paid £15m for Hamer and got less than half back.Leicester paid 15m for him.
You can understand why they want around 10m.
We paid £15m for Hamer and got less than half back.
We paid £23m for Brewster and got nowt.
We paid £17m for McBurnie and got nowt.
We paid £8m for Mousset and got nowt.
We paid £ms for Cannon and he's worth nowt to anyone but Preston ...
And we refuse to sell him.
If dem Blades were market traders they'd be Barings Bank and Wilder would be our Nick Leeson.
No wonder we're in the shit.
And our owners are stupid.
They say their business plan is based on successful player-trading.
And they have the Bettis/Wilder axis in charge.
Watching it unfold is almost unbearable.
If we sell Oné and keep Cannon , I might need medical help to keep using my ST.
Believe from the recent evidence, that the majority of supporters on here do not see Souttar as value for money at £10m especially when we lose him for six matches and have other positions to fill.
Or avoiding relegation?If true (big if), then 10m feels like too much for Souttar.
In a world of SCR we should absolutely be concerned about the club over-paying for players, especially for a depreciating asset like Souttar. This is a big commitment of the playing resources for both this and future seasons. It impacts our ability to build a competitive team for both this and future seasons. Its a big punt from the owners that will only pay off with a promotion.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?