"15-20 Players Leaving This Summer"

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?




I realise the AI term stuck but really its data analysis and if anyone thinks we should sign players in future without it then we're in trouble
The key is using both knowledge , gut feel and data to back it up .
Using data on its own is as nonsense as not using it at all.
Perhaps we might get players who are less injury prone , can last 90 mins or have some pace rather than the gaffer likes them and they'll fit in .
 
Just seen this on X. Very funny that fans have voted they’d rather keep Nwachukwu and Ukaki rather than wilder ‘culture carrier’ Shackleton 😂

 
I realise the AI term stuck but really its data analysis and if anyone thinks we should sign players in future without it then we're in trouble
The key is using both knowledge , gut feel and data to back it up .
Using data on its own is as nonsense as not using it at all.
Perhaps we might get players who are less injury prone , can last 90 mins or have some pace rather than the gaffer likes them and they'll fit in .
Tell me how well Wilder scouted Gbric or Cannon ...
Or Tom Davies or Shackleton
Just as examples , like
 
Last edited:
Tell me how well Wilder scouted Gbric or Cannon ...
Or Tom Davies or Shackleton
Just as examples , like
I've no idea, and thats my point .

It has to be a combination of the person, the player and data .

These guys are wired up like F1 cars , sprints ,recoveries, distance etc . It'll all be there along with stats and scouting.
 
I've no idea, and thats my point .

It has to be a combination of the person, the player and data .

These guys are wired up like F1 cars , sprints ,recoveries, distance etc . It'll all be there along with stats and scouting.
Exactly 💯
That's the flaw in Wilder's outright rejection of any method of assessing players ,
apart from his noticeably imperfect judgement (since 2020) ,
Or the fact that they're "in" , coz they :
like a drink and can carry that culture
or
they're riddled with injuries
or
they're a "project".
The biggest problem that the idiot Selles has given the club is not the legacy of his terrible signings
But
the fact that if he is the reference point by which the club judges the managers who follow him ,
We are going nowhere.
What we don't need to hear - ad infinitum - is
"At least he's not as bad as Selles".
That bar is set too low.
 
I realise the AI term stuck but really its data analysis and if anyone thinks we should sign players in future without it then we're in trouble
The key is using both knowledge , gut feel and data to back it up .
Using data on its own is as nonsense as not using it at all.
Perhaps we might get players who are less injury prone , can last 90 mins or have some pace rather than the gaffer likes them and they'll fit in .
As you say if we'd used data on Davies it would have told us he cant string more than 5 games together without having 3 months out and it would have saved us a fortune in wages.
 



As you say if we'd used data on Davies it would have told us he cant string more than 5 games together without having 3 months out and it would have saved us a fortune in wages.

Or, we could just have used common sense...

There was a thread on here about the (potential) signing of TD 3 years ago. Some posters said we really shouldnt be signing him as he is never fit and he will be a very expensive waste of wages... whilst some others, liked to say that the naysayers were just against the lad coming in cos he dressed like a dandy.

Seems like common sense isnt shared by all. The thing is, it gives me sod all pleasure in it turning out as a blind man could see it doing. Its just been a total waste of of a big chunk of money that could have been spent elsewhere. We havent half spunked some money away as our recruitment team(s) seemingly have shit for brains at times.

Nice lad though and he sure looks good in his attire.
 
A fully fit and regularly functioning TD would never have been a signing we could have aspired to or been able to afford. As we sadly only saw in glimpses he would have been one of the best players in the Champ so it was always a risk and unfortunately this one didn’t come off. Whatever we paid him whilst no doubt looks a lot in comparison, it’s peanuts to what he has likely had previously or was hoping to build back up to. Shame for the lad - and unfortunate for the club that this one didn’t work
 
A fully fit and regularly functioning TD would never have been a signing we could have aspired to or been able to afford. As we sadly only saw in glimpses he would have been one of the best players in the Champ so it was always a risk and unfortunately this one didn’t come off. Whatever we paid him whilst no doubt looks a lot in comparison, it’s peanuts to what he has likely had previously or was hoping to build back up to. Shame for the lad - and unfortunate for the club that this one didn’t work
As a one off gamble it would have been fine. But we make far too many of them and the only one I can ever remember paying off is Didzy.
 

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom