Moan? Nope-I saw Longhorn
A Chippy Northern Ape
AyeA big fan of Alan Wright - one for the older generation
“big” & Alan Wright in the same sentence must be a first?!?!!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
AyeA big fan of Alan Wright - one for the older generation
I'll take any player with Wright's attributes, some player was Alan.Aye
“big” & Alan Wright in the same sentence must be a first?!?!!
AbsolutelyI'll take any player with Wright's attributes, some player was Alan.
And yet still better than Grbic!!!Eeerrrmmmmm, anybody mentioned to new owners and chatGBT it’s a boys only club?
View attachment 213944
great info fantastico news hes quality ,,utb..Spurs kid at CB. Heard from a good source.
We don't need a replacement, we need a massive upgrade on himCashin would be the perfect Robinson replacement
Wouldn't be hardWe don't need a replacement, we need a massive upgrade on him
Or alternatively…it might increase our chances of getting him if Spurs look to upgrade their CBs in preparation for the Champions LeagueNo doubt we won’t get him - if at all - until right at the end of the window. Spurs also now need a big enough squad for Champions League - so this may reduce the chances of us getting him.
Manager says he wants to keep him in an attempt at to drive up the cost of any deal.This is just typical summer journalism.
Week 1 - team x interested in player y
Week 2 - Manager or team z who owns player y has decided to keep him.
Voila. Two stories with a net result of fuck all, but still managed to get in two lots of ‘bit in paper’ to fill column inches.
Standard Stir story.This is just typical summer journalism.
Week 1 - team x interested in player y
Week 2 - Manager or team z who owns player y has decided to keep him.
Voila. Two stories with a net result of fuck all, but still managed to get in two lots of ‘bit in paper’ to fill column inches.
He isn’t getting into the Spurs side any time soon but at 20 they’re not going to cut him loose.Spurs will have seen enough of him at Stoke to know whether hes good enough for the top end of the PL and Champions League. On the face of it he looks like the kind of player we need, hopefully one thst we might be able to buy leather than loan and develop for Spurs
If we're going to build a team capable of taking us up and staying up then we need to shift the focus onto permanent signings instead of relying on loan signings. If you have 3 season long loan players regularly in your starting line up then you're already at -3 as soon as you go up. You now have to find the money to adequately upgrade and replace them before you even start looking at other positions. Loan players can be good, but when they become key and irreplaceable then your strategy is wrong. Also, when they go back to their parent clubs and get sold for significant values we don't benefit from them. For example, we paid Man City a fee to borrow Doyle. We helped develop him and they then sold him to Wolves. They benefitted from both sides of the deal and we didn't. If the new owners are serious about scouting and recruiting young players to develop and sell on for profit then we need to cut back on the use of loans.He isn’t getting into the Spurs side any time soon but at 20 they’re not going to cut him loose.
Depends how deep our pockets are but you would think a loan with an obligation to buy it x, y or z are met would put us ahead of any other championship bid. But we have no idea what money we have. We could have the money to just do the deal now but with 5 loans available you think we’d not be looking at perm this season.
I’m assuming you missed or ignored the part of my post that suggested a loan with an obligation to buy. That normally ensures a lower purchase price than trying to negotiate after another good season and when the selling club know you’ll pay more for a settled player.If we're going to build a team capable of taking us up and staying up then we need to shift the focus onto permanent signings instead of relying on loan signings. If you have 3 season long loan players regularly in your starting line up then you're already at -3 as soon as you go up. You now have to find the money to adequately upgrade and replace them before you even start looking at other positions. Loan players can be good, but when they become key and irreplaceable then your strategy is wrong. Also, when they go back to their parent clubs and get sold for significant values we don't benefit from them. For example, we paid Man City a fee to borrow Doyle. We helped develop him and they then sold him to Wolves. They benefitted from both sides of the deal and we didn't.
I get that but we've had lots of these deals where we then never bought them. I can't think of many in the past where we have.I’m assuming you missed or ignored the part of my post that suggested a loan with an obligation to buy.
But we can only realistically afford him if we go up given we’re in the last year of parachute payments too?I get that but we've had lots of these deals where we then never bought them. I can't think of many in the past where we have.
We may be in the last year of parachute payments but we don't yet know how willing the owners are when it comes to subsidising the club financially. They may have some lucrative US based sponsorship deals lined up to increase revenue. I'm personally not too worried about the parachute payments decreasing as the long term strategy of the owners will have planned for this, and the data driven recruitment to find young up and coming players to develop over a couple of seasons is clearly part of that contingency as well as a longer term team build.But we can only realistically afford him if we go up given we’re in the last year of parachute payments too?
It isn’t going to balance out the loss of those payments though is it? Being realistic?We may be in the last year of parachute payments but we don't yet know how willing the owners are when it comes to subsidising the club financially. They may have some lucrative US based sponsorship deals lined up to increase revenue.
There will always be a long term and medium strategy in place, just like there were two plans in place this summer. One for if we got promoted, the other for if we didn't.It isn’t going to balance out the loss of those payments though is it? Being realistic?
If we don’t go up then there’s a new medium/long term strategy needed.
We have the funding this year to get up and I’d be shocked if we don’t look to leverage that comparative advantage to its max.
I’m not factoring in what the owners may or may not have the ability to do as it’s largely irrelevant. I’m saying that the rules of the league limit us next season if we don’t go up because we can’t duplicate that type of revenue stream legitimately. There no speculation in that, it’s just facts.There will always be a long term and medium strategy in place, just like there were two plans in place this summer. One for if we got promoted, the other for if we didn't.
We can't assume what we'll do based on the past as we have total different owners. We haven't seen enough from them yet to make safe assumptions. At the end of this summer we'll know more. At the end of this coming season we'll know what to expect.
The unknown is both scary and exciting but we shouldn't fear it due to what has happened in the past under other owners. The Prince couldn't support us as he had no money. Our new owners are a group of several multi-millionaires.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?