Blade56
MUGA
- Joined
- Mar 7, 2014
- Messages
- 27,420
- Reaction score
- 37,110
OyTomorrow
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
OyTomorrow
i would agree with you with cannon and campbell up top but definetly disagree with you about us not needing a striker we needed one in august and didnt get one we have to have competition for places everywhere and thats also why we need 2 centre backs to come inI’d go Campbell personally, his all round game is better than Cannon, we’ve signed Cannon now, so I’d look to go two up top. Campbell and Cannon.
If we’d not gone for Cannon let’s say. We’d have had Two/Three players there competing for one spot. Currently we’ve spent 10M on a striker (massive outlay) and we’re in a position where we need at least one CB, I’d feel comfortable with two.i would agree with you with cannon and campbell up top but definetly disagree with you about us not needing a striker we needed one in august and didnt get one we have to have competition for places everywhere and thats also why we need 2 centre backs to come in
But he's having his minutes managed and can pobably only play a half at best and probably only once a weekI’d go Campbell personally, his all round game is better than Cannon, we’ve signed Cannon now, so I’d look to go two up top. Campbell and Cannon.
I don't think you live in the real worldIf we’d not gone for Cannon let’s say. We’d have had Two/Three players there competing for one spot. Currently we’ve spent 10M on a striker (massive outlay) and we’re in a position where we need at least one CB, I’d feel comfortable with two.
I’d rather we spent half the fee on a striker, to get the lad from millwall and another CB.
im in the minority on here regarding cannon i think hes a good signing and will come good especially when hamer comes back in but imo we definetly need 2 centre backs to come in and i think we will get 2 dunne and holdingIf we’d not gone for Cannon let’s say. We’d have had Two/Three players there competing for one spot. Currently we’ve spent 10M on a striker (massive outlay) and we’re in a position where we need at least one CB, I’d feel comfortable with two.
I’d rather we spent half the fee on a striker, to get the lad from millwall and another CB.
Yeah, I know mate. I was just joshin'.born a Blade .. been watching em 43 years . im just happy we got a stand on all 4 sides of the ground
We wouldn’t get a player with 6 months left on his current deal for 5m?I don't think you live in the real world
We wouldn't get tanganga with the 5mil we had left over
He says he's tried texting you a couple of times but you must have changed your number?Rob Holding was decent for Arsenal but ive lost touch since
Let's look at the other striking options we had pre-Cannon:We’ve pissed away 10M for a striker that we didn’t really need. Yet we can’t stump up a decent amount for a position we’re in critical need of? Crazy.
And which striker would we get for 5 million ?We wouldn’t get a player with 6 months left on his current deal for 5m?
He made the winning goal on Saturday and had no service at all against Hull. He'll be better with Hamer pulling the strings behind him. We 100% needed another striker and I've not written him off after 2 games.Always worth a punt init? Rather punt for one at a lower price (and better return) than the one we’ve gone for (who doesn’t really suit or have attributes needed to play on his own up top)
If we were being quite so loose with the metaphorical pursestrings, we'd have already offered more than what we have for Dunne.In terms of what we're willing to spend we've set a massive precedent with Cannon. Not to mention 2 possible luxury signing wingers. We appear to have dispensed with any strict adherence to value for money, in favour of a pay what it takes approach
I’m not writing him off, I’ve said he’s not the striker we needed imo. And the fee we paid had a massive tax incorporated.He made the winning goal on Saturday and had no service at all against Hull. He'll be better with Hamer pulling the strings behind him. We 100% needed another striker and I've not written him off after 2 games.
One from abroad where we’re not paying the inflated English tax.And which striker would we get for 5 million ?
Like who.?One from abroad where we’re not paying the inflated English tax.
You can cross Oné off straight away no way ready for a Premiership chasing side.Campbell
Moore
Brewster
BBD can play this position
Oné
So yeah. Didn’t really need.
Abroad one.Like who.?
Consistent goal threat? Cannon? A striker he is, a potential long term option he could be. Consistent goal threat? He isn’t that for me I’m afraid, certainly not in this blades team. I campaigned for Kone as he suits the needs of a striker in our team. A striker who fashions his own chances, is able to play up top alone, and has pace/power. Cannon offers none of those outside finishing chances created for him.Let's look at the other striking options we had pre-Cannon:
Campbell: Potentially, but with a record of injuries. Missed multiple games as a result.
Moore: Far from the success many hoped he would be. Has missed several very good chances, including 2 penalties. Has missed multiple games through injury.
Brewster: Missed games through injury. Decided by many as not good enough.
Onè: Unproven at this level. Needs a loan at a L1 or L2 club, but had to stay as we were short of options. Has had to play far more than we would have liked due to others being injured.
None of the above can be relied upon to deliver a consistent stream of goals. Campbell is the most likely guven his form this season, but there's no knowing how long he might go without an injury. That's not really sustainable when the options behind him haven't shown themselves to be as prolific. It was important to get someone in to be a consisten goal threat. In Cannon, we seem to have identified a player who can be a long-term option in that position.
Also, you say we didn't need a striker, yet you've spent most of this window campaigning for us to go after Kone?
sometimes both…of life or just the life of Holding ?
If I knew that I’d be part of the scouting team. But they do exist outside the British isles. And that’ll ultimately be Wilders downfall. We/he doesn’t value any player outside the United Kingdom. There’s superior value abroad.Like who.?
You actually said we didn't need a striker! Make your mind up!I’m not writing him off, I’ve said he’s not the striker we needed imo. And the fee we paid had a massive tax incorporated.
Apparently it’s 12 million for tangaWe wouldn’t get a player with 6 months left on his current deal for 5m?
Sounds crazy, but that's about right to be honest.Apparently it’s 12 million for tanga
dane give the lad a chance please hes only played 2 games for us and its not his fault that apart from hamer weve little creativity in the squad especially in midfield and out wide billy sharp hasnt scored all those goals in his career by creating them himself give him the chances and im confident cannon will score plenty for usConsistent goal threat? Cannon? A striker he is, a potential long term option he could be. Consistent goal threat? He isn’t that for me I’m afraid, certainly not in this blades team. I campaigned for Kone as he suits the needs of a striker in our team. A striker who fashions his own chances, is able to play up top alone, and has pace/power. Cannon offers none of those outside finishing chances created for him.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?