BurrowsMost Harry’s that we get are decent.
Maguire
Soutter
Bassett!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
BurrowsMost Harry’s that we get are decent.
Maguire
Soutter
Bassett!
Love the positivity…..Jesus ChristThe lad who scored an own goal, conceded a pen, and got sent off all in the same game for Ipswich at Brentford earlier this season? I'm not convinced. Especially after I saw this post earlier about the same player:
Seen a couple of Wednesday fans saying Clarke chose United over Wednesday because of money...
Not sure how a player under contract at Ipswich can earn more money at United over Wednesday![]()
I bloody hope not! I waited 4 years to get rid of 352. It would be like bumping in to your ex who was hot in the beginning but aged very quickly.and badly, but you stuck it out because it worked before, even though everyone else could see how badly it had gone despite the odd happy moment along the way. After a particularly tough year together you eventually part ways. You meet someone new and exciting, everything is going rather well for the first 6 months but then one night you have an argument and a few days later bump in to the ex in Derby and have a go for old times sake, but you quickly realise it's a horrible mistake and pretend it never happened.Although I understand he played at Chelsea in a back 5, so maybe Wilder will revert back to 3 centre backs and 2 wingbacks.
It’s most likely true.You really have to admire the mental gymnastics they go through to come up with stuff like that, which will now be a FACT over in NK.
It’s most likely true.
They have just paid a high price fee for Charles thanks to us. They’re no doubt paying 100% of his wages and because of our public interest in Charles, Leicester no doubt shit the bed and we could get Choudhury for less than we’d earlier negotiated
So yes, we probably had more cash in the pot for Clarke
PotterLog any view on Clarke?
Benjamin Bloom shares his view on Ipswich Town's Harry Clarke as he joins United on loan
#failurepaymentsinnitSeen a couple of Wednesday fans saying Clarke chose United over Wednesday because of money...
Not sure how a player under contract at Ipswich can earn more money at United over Wednesday![]()
Exactly. They'll know all about failure#failurepaymentsinnit
They sure do. When was the last they finished above us in the league? 8 years ago? About to make that a 9th year.Exactly. They'll know all about failure
Unsure if posted already but here's the obligatory highlight reel...
...makes him look like prime Ivanovic, and there's a comment that says he used to be a striker!
Is there an FA rule limiting how many Harry's you can have in the match day squad?
"Harry" must be this season's "Oliver"
That’s my concern .. Gilchrist is not a dominant centre back and doesn’t have either the physique nor experience yetWe can’t send Gilchrist back, at the moment he’s our only other option at centre back.
Maybe Wilder is looking to have him compete for a starting spot at centre back?
#failurepaymentsinnit
Playing both. Shaving Cooper, Anel and Burrows' heads too. Going for a proper hard nut back 5.It's obvious what the plan is here.
Clarke and Gilchrist are doppelgangers.
Can bring the other one at half time and not waste a sub.
Could be:Seen a couple of Wednesday fans saying Clarke chose United over Wednesday because of money...
Not sure how a player under contract at Ipswich can earn more money at United over Wednesday![]()
Unsure if posted already but here's the obligatory highlight reel...
...makes him look like prime Ivanovic, and there's a comment that says he used to be a striker!
Is there an FA rule limiting how many Harry's you can have in the match day squad?
"Harry" must be this season's "Oliver"
AyeI bloody hope not! I waited 4 years to get rid of 352. It would be like bumping in to your ex who was hot in the beginning but aged very quickly.and badly, but you stuck it out because it worked before, even though everyone else could see how badly it had gone despite the odd happy moment along the way. After a particularly tough year together you eventually part ways. You meet someone new and exciting, everything is going rather well for the first 6 months but then one night you have an argument and a few days later bump in to the ex in Derby and have a go for old times sake, but you quickly realise it's a horrible mistake and pretend it never happened.
Or something like that.
He just can't defend which is a minor problem.He's quick, phenomenal in the air and decent on the deck
Just a thought could do with a bit more ariel dominance in that back line
Ah sorry, yes the player would get the sameAny additional monies would be for any loan fee. The player wouldn’t benefit from that, he’d just be paid as per his contract surely? The claim appears to be we’d pay HIM more which makes little sense. Failure payments innit……..
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?