Blade56
MUGA
- Joined
- Mar 7, 2014
- Messages
- 27,316
- Reaction score
- 36,847
Fore the more sophisticated members (older)Clever - very clever
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
Fore the more sophisticated members (older)Clever - very clever
The only other offer I've seen was £13m if Mackems got promoted.Ha ha yeh
It means it will potentially could cost us £13 million, which is less than the reported £15 million potential offer from Sunderland.
However ours was more attractive because it’s guaranteed £10 million purchase + £3 million of clauses/ bonuses.
Where as the Sunderland offer was just a loan….and only pay the £15 million if were promoted to the PL this season, otherwise he’s back at Leicester.
What the hell's a "package deal"? We sending him out to Tenerife for the photoshoot?
Isn’t that just a news aggregation attention seeking account?
Yes but they've aggregated it from Alan Nixon who's legitIsn’t that just a news aggregation attention seeking account?
Useful though especially when it picks up stuff from more obscure non local journalists!Isn’t that just a news aggregation attention seeking account?
Stoke City shirt too.Useful though especially when it picks up stuff from more obscure non local journalists!
It will be undisclosed, then a journalist will make something up and it will become gospel, unless he’s shit then we add 20% on for effect.The only other offer I've seen was £13m if Mackems got promoted.
This is completely uncertain and thus not really an offer at all
Not much use to Foxes who need cash for FFP.
So we had no need to go anywhere near Mackems offer , coz ours was an immediate transfer deal , not a loan.
I dunno how Nixon gets his details but to me it was a straight haggle between our cash and Foxes need to sell ,
so I very much doubt we've paid £10m as the basic price , having initially offered £7m.
We had no need to match the size of Mackems figure coz it wasn't a reliable solution for Foxes.
I agree there'll probably be some add-ons , one of which could be us getting to PL.
Anyway , we'll see what the clubs are prepared to announce as the fee - they may even say undisclosed if Foxes want to trump it up for their fans and we want to play it down so we don't look like we're a soft touch.
My only concern about the fee is that I hope we have left ourselves enough to replace the biggest 2 holes in our squad :
Blaster & Souttar.
We are currently on the bones of our arse for CB & MF.
At CB , I discount RND , so there is just Baptiste.
In MF , both Souza & Davies have the sort of injuries which can be frustrating to heal and can recur if they are played before full recovery.
JJK might be nice to have as a 3rd RB after Alfie & Seriki and above Shackleton , but
CB & MF would seem to be a greater need.
Presumably if Cannon & JJK are permanents ,
the CB & MF will be loans , which can be tricky to find.
Nobody is claiming it's the official photoStoke City shirt too.
We pay a lot of money immediately and the add-ons if promotedWhat the hell's a "package deal"? We sending him out to Tenerife for the photoshoot?
I only see it when it’s posted on here, it looks pretty shit to me.Useful though especially when it picks up stuff from more obscure non local journalists!
Isn't it 20% every game they play, I mean Brewsters at £25 million now.It will be undisclosed, then a journalist will make something up and it will become gospel, unless he’s shit then we add 20% on for effect.
I don’t believe it’s the case with Cannon.Said all along this smells of someone holding out for better deal/offer. All announcements have been “Southampton have agreed fee”. My guess is now they know what Southampton will accept he’s touting himself around other clubs. Not getting off to a good start if what looks like a duck, quacks like a duck turns out to be a feckin mongooses.
No, I don’t think that theory is anywhere near the case. Pretty sure they’re all independentI wonder if this one is being held up due to waiting on Shea Charles decision. If Shea is a no go then we turn to HC. Maybe the deal for Tom will be structured differently if we're also getting HC from Leicester too. Just a thought
Again, don’t think that’s the case with this onemight be leaving it until the latest minute for Hull?
Makes sense for the announcement to be tomorrow, assume the players had today off after last nights game and travel, and I don’t think we normally do signing announcements on match days?
Players were in this afternoon.Makes sense for the announcement to be tomorrow, assume the players had today off after last nights game and travel, and I don’t think we normally do signing announcements on match days?
Makes it tricky since we seem to play every other day nowMakes sense for the announcement to be tomorrow, assume the players had today off after last nights game and travel, and I don’t think we normally do signing announcements on match days?
Wilder said in pre match conference that the players wouldn't have today off, they're going over prep and tactics for Friday, they usually would have next day off but as it's quick turn around they would be in.Makes sense for the announcement to be tomorrow, assume the players had today off after last nights game and travel, and I don’t think we normally do signing announcements on match days?
Could you enlighten us as to what the hold up may be?Again, don’t think that’s the case with this one
I'd assume by Nixon saying he's signed he's available for Friday? Just depends if Nixon is rightI hope he's available for Friday night.
The squad is looking quite depleted and I'm sure the players would get a boost from another arrival.
Not position-specific , just to give them encouragement that the cavalry's arriving
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?