SwissBlade
Well-Known Member
Shall we just play a 3 thenAgreed. We don't have a left centre back that suits a back four either.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
Shall we just play a 3 thenAgreed. We don't have a left centre back that suits a back four either.
Shall we just play a 3 then
Transfer window opens new years dayA lot will rest on Brewster, One, Marsh and Campbell. Far too much. The Christmas and new year period looks particularly treacherous.
Sai Sachdev and Ryan One, come on down!... and lost 20.
So if Moore and Gilchrist are injured for any length of time, what are we doing then?
It just makes me laugh whenever I see people say we need more players because we let 20 go, even after bringing 10 new players in.I'm with you, Silent Blade - the majority of players that have left contributed next to nothing last season. Our starting 11 is up there with the best in the league, and we have one of the best youth academies, which has produced a number of players who are on the fringes and who will be fine if/when introduced to a team of first teamers. Some people think running a club is like Football Manager and get totally carried away with this deadline day nonsense that Sky invented.
Rb,s Gilchrist, Shackleton, seriki
Cb,s anel, Souttar, RND,robbo (Gilchrist if needed)
Lb,s burrows, McCallum
Cm,s souza, blaster, peck (hamer/Shackleton when needed)
Wingers, attacking midfielder, O'Hare,hamer,rak, burrows, Campbell brooks
Cf, Moore, Brewster,one
No doubt I've missed someone
On paper not a bad squad but short at centre half and centre forward
It all depends wether CW can get a tune out of them
I think we've missed a opportunity with mepham and billing
It’s not 20.... and lost 20.
So if Moore and Gilchrist are injured for any length of time, what are we doing then?
It just makes me laugh whenever I see people say we need more players because we let 20 go, even after bringing 10 new players in.
We didn't need to replace all 20 of those players.
We have a plethora of L2 ready players to go in the U21's though! That'll doNot to be a Debbie downer....
RB 1 available, Shackleton is another sick note by all counts, Seriki injured and couldn't get in rotherham side.
LB fine
CB RND showed he isn't league one CB standard so we have 3 options there
CM I like Peck but not ready to be a starter if souza or blaster go down only 2 viable options
CAM 2 good options
RW 2 options who look very raw
LW 0.5 options Campbell might be alright, Hamer shouldn't play left wing.
Striker 2 options Moore and Brewster (one of which can't stay healthy, rubbish lone striker)
I'd call that paper thin.
There weren’t 20, but I agree, most of them we were glad to see the back of, and the squad was bloated with a lot of dead wood.It just makes me laugh whenever I see people say we need more players because we let 20 go, even after bringing 10 new players in.
We didn't need to replace all 20 of those players.
The problem with spreading the rebuild over 2 years is if we don't gain promotion this season Hamer, Souza and Anel will all more than likely be sold, so the rebuild will pretty much have to start againWhen you lose 20 players over one summer it's not realistic to think you'll sign 20 replacements. Rome wasn't built in a day. Next summer is more important than January. I'd rather not go up this season and rebuild adequately over two seasons.
There weren’t 20, but I agree, most of them we were glad to see the back of, and the squad was bloated with a lot of dead wood.
True, but we'll hopefully still get decent fees as they're all tied down to contracts. The money can be reinvested so long as we make profit on them.The problem with spreading the rebuild over 2 years is if we don't gain promotion this season Hamer, Souza and Anel will all more than likely be sold, so the rebuild will pretty much have to start again
Probably isn't 20, I just mentioned 20 because that's what everyone else was saying.There weren’t 20, but I agree, most of them we were glad to see the back of, and the squad was bloated with a lot of dead wood.
He’ll persist for a couple more games, the problem is that we’ve got too many midfielders to fit in so playing an extra defender really screws us.Shall we just play a 3 then
Spot onI can't fault the departures, but i do worry still, to commit to them we need to make sure we have quality players, but also the right quantity of players coming in, 2 players for each position. I like the signings we have made and on a 1-11 we are very good, but we are threadbare when you write it down. We have changed systems and have a lack of players and depth to fit this system. We have injury struggled Brewster and Campbell as cover for a 32 year old Kieffer Moore, Hamer as a left winger who is our best midfielder but he's never been a winger. A couple of injuries to the back line and we are chucking kids in - it can be great for a one-off cup game but can also hinder us massively. We are reliant on them who let's be honest for their own progression, need to be moving down the ladder a couple of leagues to get that regular experience, playing at this level routinely will never help them.
One, Marsh, Peck, Seriki, Hampson are all a couple of levels above what they should be right now. I think they all have real promise too, I just hope we utilise it right.
Edit - Peck could be a good League 1 option I would say!!
I think its 17. 18 if you count Curtis going out on loan and soon to be 19 if Trusty leaves.There weren’t 20, but I agree, most of them we were glad to see the back of, and the squad was bloated with a lot of dead wood.
10 signing we had to make and is expected to make ! We lost 16 players about why all the excuses for sufc short sightednessIt’s generally been inflated by adding in the likes of Larouci, who was a) a loan and b) shite.
Spot
Burnley, Leeds and Luton (our biggest rivals on paper) have all had to sell their best players, the Blades have managed a significant rebuild without losing our biggest saleable assets in Hamer, Anel, Souza (yet…..)
This is what some of our fans fail to grasp.The problem with spreading the rebuild over 2 years is if we don't gain promotion this season Hamer, Souza and Anel will all more than likely be sold, so the rebuild will pretty much have to start again
RND was playing right back - still very rusty and got beat a few times. But we all know he is a very capable right back just needs a few games.Not to be a Debbie downer....
RB 1 available, Shackleton is another sick note by all counts, Seriki injured and couldn't get in rotherham side.
LB fine
CB RND showed he isn't league one CB standard so we have 3 options there
CM I like Peck but not ready to be a starter if souza or blaster go down only 2 viable options
CAM 2 good options
RW 2 options who look very raw
LW 0.5 options Campbell might be alright, Hamer shouldn't play left wing.
Striker 2 options Moore and Brewster (one of which can't stay healthy, rubbish lone striker)
I'd call that paper thin.
I think that it has been done to death on this site, so yes we’re all awareare you aware of his track record of availability over the last 4 years?
I'm sure he's a left back, didn't he line up at CB against Barnsley?RND was playing right back - still very rusty and got beat a few times. But we all know he is a very capable right back just needs a few games.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?