petcharlie
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 11, 2013
- Messages
- 2,671
- Reaction score
- 3,094
i like itIs that you Mrs wilder .
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
i like itIs that you Mrs wilder .
Baresi… Jesus
To be fair it’s reported everywhere that Wilder was one of the main reasons he’s come here.Is that you Mrs wilder .
Thought he was a better wicketkeeperBloody good bowler
And even better with the willow!Thought he was a better wicketkeeper![]()
I'm not convinced that we are going with a back 4 as our default lineup for the season - I think we have been forced into that due to a lack of numbers. The signing of the Peterborough lad and the attempt to sign the household appliance from Wolves makes me think CW still prefers to play with wingbacks. It will be interesting to see if we sign another player for the right side of defence.gilchrist would be more of a defensive right back and that suits our new 4 at the back system still think worrall souttar or mepham will come in as well great signing this
That Gilcrest has signed, which may or may not be true but dot expect any info out of our well run well communicating club!
Being so happy keeps you going. Never a positive response.That Gilcrest has signed, which may or may not be true but dot expect any info out of our well run well communicating club!
What if it’s one massive one? Or three.I hope the nurse feels two bollox and not one tommorow.
That's why I bought a dysonMore a case of hoever falling apart probably
yes interesting point youve brought up there i was slightly blinkered assuming gilchrist would be coming in as right back in a back 4 but you could be right maybe hes coming in as right centre back in a 3 with anel at centre back which i think is his best position anyway and robbo a d trusty vying for left centre backI'm not convinced that we are going with a back 4 as our default lineup for the season - I think we have been forced into that due to a lack of numbers. The signing of the Peterborough lad and the attempt to sign the household appliance from Wolves makes me think CW still prefers to play with wingbacks. It will be interesting to see if we sign another player for the right side of defence.
I'm hoping it'll be a bit of both. We seem to be building a team of players capable of switching formations to change games.yes interesting point youve brought up there i was slightly blinkered assuming gilchrist would be coming in as right back in a back 4 but you could be right maybe hes coming in as right centre back in a 3 with anel at centre back which i think is his best position anyway and robbo a d trusty vying for left centre back
I think we should hold fire on giving any credit until these new players do da bidniz for Dem BladesWell,I will give the club,Wilder and Co credit up to now of the type of quality players that are joining up,I’m in favour no matter how panicky some supporters are. Still need 3 more in my opinion maybe 4 cos Moore cannot do it all on his lonesome.
I guess having insufficient balls really is grounds for failing a medical given the clearout Wilder's been having...I hope the nurse feels two bollox and not one tommorow.
100%Watch us miss the deadline to register him for PNE.
I'm not convinced that we are going with a back 4 as our default lineup for the season - I think we have been forced into that due to a lack of numbers. The signing of the Peterborough lad and the attempt to sign the household appliance from Wolves makes me think CW still prefers to play with wingbacks. It will be interesting to see if we sign another player for the right side of defence.
Seem to recall someone having a username on here along the lines of "Wilder's enormous testicles", sadly autocomplete is throwing nowt up so it might have to go in the "Things you thought happened but might not have" thread!
Well if he cannot make a good competitive team out of the players at his disposal with hopefully a couple more additions,he isn’t the second coming of a successful manager. We will see.I think we should hold fire on giving any credit until these new players do da bidniz for Dem Blades
Or worse noneWhat if it’s one massive one? Or three.
5 signings needed.Well if he cannot make a good competitive team out of the players at his disposal with hopefully a couple more additions,he isn’t the second coming of a successful manager. We will see.
5 signings and 4 weeks to bed them in.5 signings needed.
After that it’s down too him.
I still think it's closer to 7.5 signings needed.
After that it’s down too him.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?