Transfer Money will it be spent - Poll

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Will the United spend £36 million?

  • Yes

    Votes: 120 32.9%
  • No

    Votes: 245 67.1%

  • Total voters
    365

In sterling about £36.5m.

In addition, there will be further fees (loan fee, signing in fee, agent fees) for the two 'frees' and I imagine they will push the total so far up to around £40m. Then you can offset that against what we have sold in IN and SB (probably about £30-£35m) so we may have a total spend of £5-£10m as of now).

Might be enough there for one more major spend and a couple of loans thereafter and I think that's our lot for now.
 




And we’re letting our top targets sign for other teams…..or just now not interested due to…… fees

we wanted Akpom, Archer and Doyle, non are going to sign and we’ve only spent £6m that’s just embarrassing, what the hell are we playing at. It’s not often you get a chance at the prem, it feels like we’re completely wasting a massive opportunity.
 
Still believe Utd should start their own brewery and sell loads of beer like Tottenham do. Could be worth millions over the season.
With the Compass staff and their pouring ability it would be the quickest bankruptcy filing in history.
 
Assuming we sign Archer, how much munneh we actually spent? Away from the players sales, the 20m budget seems about right. (If one last perm)
 
Assuming we sign Archer, how much munneh we actually spent? Away from the players sales, the 20m budget seems about right. (If one last perm)
Good question. It's hard to keep up to date as the ins and outs monetary wise are all over the place.
Does anyone have an insight to what we have spent/raised through player sales overall so far.
 
So with the incomings and outgoings we roughly spent about 20m on transfer fees?
Correct.

You can ignore wages, agents fees and instalments etc because they also applies to our sales. Looks a decent spend and a stronger younger side.

Hecky said without the sales it would have been unlikely we would have been in for Hamer and Archer.


Gustavo Hamer -£15 million
Vini Souza - £10 million
Auston Trusty - £5 million
Benie Traore - £4 million
Anis Slimane - £2 million
Tom Davies - Free
Yasser Larouci - Loan Transfer
Cameron Archer - £18.5 Million

Means a total spend £54.5 million
 
We are guaranteed the Archer money back, via the buy-back clause or by earning another 100m odd by staying up. So the net spend is around 5m.
 
We are guaranteed the Archer money back, via the buy-back clause or by earning another 100m odd by staying up. So the net spend is around 5m.

I like how 3 different posts in the space of 10 minutes have 3 totally different net spends. I think anywhere from £2-7m is likely about right
 
I like how 3 different posts in the space of 10 minutes have 3 totally different net spends. I think anywhere from £2-7m is likely about right
Which isn't very good if you believe El accounto saying the 18m for Archer is out of next seasons budget as it stands.
 
Which isn't very good if you believe El accounto saying the 18m for Archer is out of next seasons budget as it stands.

So is he saying we don’t pay Villa anything this year? If so, and they take him back it’s a zero transfer cost?
 
Correct.

You can ignore wages, agents fees and instalments etc because they also applies to our sales. Looks a decent spend and a stronger younger side.

Hecky said without the sales it would have been unlikely we would have been in for Hamer and Archer.


Gustavo Hamer -£15 million
Vini Souza - £10 million
Auston Trusty - £5 million
Benie Traore - £4 million
Anis Slimane - £2 million
Tom Davies - Free
Yasser Larouci - Loan Transfer
Cameron Archer - £18.5 Million

Means a total spend £54.5 million
I don't think we will have paid all those fees straight up. They will be split over a period of time, like most transfers are.
The initial outlay of these upfront fees would be intresting to see how deep or shallow our pockets are.
 
I don't think we will have paid all those fees straight up. They will be split over a period of time, like most transfers are.
The initial outlay of these upfront fees would be intresting to see how deep or shallow our pockets are.
Same with the money coming in. Cash flow will be tight again no doubt.
 



I don't think we will have paid all those fees straight up. They will be split over a period of time, like most transfers are.
The initial outlay of these upfront fees would be intresting to see how deep or shallow our pockets are.





For what it's worth
 
I reckon our wage bill isn't too much higher than last season either. Billy, Enda, JOC and Sander would have been four of the highest earners at the club, plus Fleck would have taken a cut to stay on. Can't imagine many of our new lads would be on the same wages as those 5 last season.
 
So with the incomings and outgoings we roughly spent about 20m on transfer fees?
Give or take, allegedly. But if the Archer deal is what it’s rumoured to be, it’s a loan if we don’t stay up so wouldn’t even count it. If that’s the case then upon relegation we’ll have roughly broke even if not spent a little bit. If we stay up it comes into play and we’ll be at net £20m spent. Allegedly.
 
Give or take, allegedly. But if the Archer deal is what it’s rumoured to be, it’s a loan if we don’t stay up so wouldn’t even count it. If that’s the case then upon relegation we’ll have roughly broke even if not spent a little bit. If we stay up it comes into play and we’ll be at net £20m spent. Allegedly.

The rumour was we paid half now (£9 Million) and the other £9 million if way stay up. If we go down Villa buy back for £9 + £1 million. Again not worth quibbling about figures as its just very similar to an incremental payment transfer.
 

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom