Have these clauses actually been confirmed by both clubs?
If so, can someone explain them as simple as possible. (The buy backs)
Common sense really.
Most players with talent are uncomfortable joining us due to us being one of the favourites for relegation.
They want salary protection which we don't offer, so regards wages they are focussed on the terms of the relegation clause.
Also the bottom line is Archer has served his time in the Championship and doesn't want to play there again.
United are trying to learn from mistakes, we don't want another Brewster situation
or a repeat of last season where we're struggling to stay with FFP, risking points deductions.
So we if we're relegated, we lose him, he returns back to Villa, so in effect it was like a loan
but everyone is happy. Villa are pleased to have him back, United have protected ourselves financially and the player remains in the Premier League.
If we stay up....then he stays at United but Villa are worried he might be the next Michael Owen.
So if he ends up being brilliant in the PL (which is unlikely) then Villa have an option to buy his back, rumoured to be for £40 million.
So we lose a top striker but will have stayed up, made a quick decent profit on the Archer deal and have substantial funds to find a replacement striker.