CONFIRMED Cameron Archer signs for the Blades - 4 year contract

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?


Is it just me or is this rule about not liveblogging the press conferences fucking ridiculous in this day and age? Had hoped it was just an EFL thing and we'd be rid of it this season

1692969338565.png
 
My guess is they are taking a long time to look over this bizarre deal before giving approval. However since we had our end done well in time he will be allowed to play against Manchester city.
 
Contractual situation sounds very iffy if Archer is having to sign two contracts with two clubs.
Hope United have looked very closely at the rules as we are one club who should be very aware of the problems these sort of things bring.
 
Contractual situation sounds very iffy if Archer is having to sign two contracts with two clubs.
Hope United have looked very closely at the rules as we are one club who should be very aware of the problems these sort of things bring.
You are right but end of day as long as we don't lie about anything the mud sticks with the EPL sign off
 
You are right but end of day as long as we don't lie about anything the mud sticks with the EPL sign off
Feels like the sort of thing that's got potential to bring a lot of trouble to our door.
He would essentially be contracted to two clubs at the same time, both playing in the same division.
 
Feels like the sort of thing that's got potential to bring a lot of trouble to our door.
He would essentially be contracted to two clubs at the same time, both playing in the same division.
No he wouldn't
The villa contract only becomes active if a certain criteria is met. He is only under contract with one club.
 

Feels like the sort of thing that's got potential to bring a lot of trouble to our door.
He would essentially be contracted to two clubs at the same time, both playing in the same division.
I'd be a liar if I said I'm not a little uneasy about this type of deal but a loan deal isn't that different in terms of having a foot in both camps.

I'm just hoping the PL are ultimately responsible by signing it off rather than us/Villa.
 
No he wouldn't
The villa contract only becomes active if a certain criteria is met. He is only under contract with one club.
Exactly. You can't see a problem with that?
It's two clubs in the same division and he would have actually signed contracts with both of them.
 
I'd be a liar if I said I'm not a little uneasy about this type of deal but a loan deal isn't that different in terms of having a foot in both camps.

I'm just hoping the PL are ultimately responsible by signing it off rather than us/Villa.
A loan is just that though, not the same as what seems to be being proposed here.
 
Exactly. You can't see a problem with that?
It's two clubs in the same division and he would have actually signed contracts with both of them.
There is no problem with it. All he has to sign is conformation of the terms he'd be agreeing to if the buy back was needed.
The contract with Villa is not an active contract.
 
A loan is just that though, not the same as what seems to be being proposed here.
I agree it seems unorthodox but the concern for some appears to be around Archer having a conflict of interest.

The same can be said of loans with options or obligations to buy.
 

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom