BrisBlade
Stop... Hamer time!
- Joined
- Aug 9, 2019
- Messages
- 971
- Reaction score
- 1,974
Or the next TC or Ili. Hope so.Could be the next Brewster. Hope not.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
Or the next TC or Ili. Hope so.Could be the next Brewster. Hope not.
That would be nice.Or the next TC or Ili. Hope so.
Me too.I could get run over by a bus tomorrow, hope not.
Foxy sitting in the thread, ready to change the title. I know his gameIt's almost like theres a whole host of utter bollocks and speculation spoken and perpetuated![]()
Hey. You're the master facilitatorIt's almost like theres a whole host of utter bollocks and speculation spoken and perpetuated![]()
Hey. You're the master facilitator![]()
Think again...
I could get run over by a bus tomorrow, hope not.
You are right but end of day as long as we don't lie about anything the mud sticks with the EPL sign offContractual situation sounds very iffy if Archer is having to sign two contracts with two clubs.
Hope United have looked very closely at the rules as we are one club who should be very aware of the problems these sort of things bring.
Feels like the sort of thing that's got potential to bring a lot of trouble to our door.You are right but end of day as long as we don't lie about anything the mud sticks with the EPL sign off
No he wouldn'tFeels like the sort of thing that's got potential to bring a lot of trouble to our door.
He would essentially be contracted to two clubs at the same time, both playing in the same division.
McB got somebody in a headlock.
I'd be a liar if I said I'm not a little uneasy about this type of deal but a loan deal isn't that different in terms of having a foot in both camps.Feels like the sort of thing that's got potential to bring a lot of trouble to our door.
He would essentially be contracted to two clubs at the same time, both playing in the same division.
Exactly. You can't see a problem with that?No he wouldn't
The villa contract only becomes active if a certain criteria is met. He is only under contract with one club.
People getting impatient. Usual panic. Over analysis.I keep going away from the forum for a few hours hoping that when I return it’s all done….. done this 6 times now… what the hell is going on
A loan is just that though, not the same as what seems to be being proposed here.I'd be a liar if I said I'm not a little uneasy about this type of deal but a loan deal isn't that different in terms of having a foot in both camps.
I'm just hoping the PL are ultimately responsible by signing it off rather than us/Villa.
There is no problem with it. All he has to sign is conformation of the terms he'd be agreeing to if the buy back was needed.Exactly. You can't see a problem with that?
It's two clubs in the same division and he would have actually signed contracts with both of them.
I agree it seems unorthodox but the concern for some appears to be around Archer having a conflict of interest.A loan is just that though, not the same as what seems to be being proposed here.
EL ACCOUNTO LIED! I AM SHOCKEDThe deadline was midday TODAY!!!![]()
NoWhat if we get relegated because Archer is properly rubbish? Why would Villa be obligated to buy him then?
Yes they would
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?